p53 SUMOylation promotes its nuclear export by facilitating its release from the nuclear export receptor CRM1.

Chromosomal region maintenance 1 (CRM1) mediates p53 nuclear export. Although p53 SUMOylation promotes its nuclear export, the underlying mechanism is unclear. Here we show that tethering of a small, ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) moiety to p53 markedly increases its cytoplasmic localization. SUMO attachment to p53 does not affect its oligomerization, suggesting that subunit dissociation required for exposing p53's nuclear export signal (NES) is unnecessary for p53 nuclear export. Surprisingly, SUMO-mediated p53 nuclear export depends on the SUMO-interacting motif (SIM)-binding pocket of SUMO-1. The CRM1 C-terminal domain lacking the NES-binding groove interacts with tetrameric p53, and the proper folding of the p53 core domain, rather than the presence of the N- or C-terminal tails, appears to be important for p53-CRM1 interaction. The CRM1 Huntington, EF3, a subunit of PP2A, and TOR1 9 (HEAT9) loop, which regulates GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran binding and cargo release, contains a prototypical SIM. Remarkably, disruption of this SIM in conjunction with a mutated SIM-binding groove of SUMO-1 markedly enhances the binding of CRM1 to p53-SUMO-1 and their accumulation in the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), as well as their persistent association in the cytoplasm. We propose that SUMOylation of a CRM1 cargo such as p53 at the NPCs unlocks the HEAT9 loop of CRM1 to facilitate the disassembly of the transporting complex and cargo release to the cytoplasm.

Inhibition of p53 by adenovirus type 12 E1B-55K deregulates cell cycle control and sensitizes tumor cells to genotoxic agents.

Adenovirus E1B-55K represses p53-mediated transcription. However, the phenotypic consequence of p53 inhibition by E1B-55K for cell cycle regulation and drug sensitivity in tumor cells has not been examined. In HCT116 cells with constitutive E1B-55K expression, the activation of p53 target genes such as the p21, Mdm2, and Puma genes was attenuated, despite markedly elevated p53 protein levels. HCT116 cells with E1B-55K expression displayed a cell cycle profile similar to that of the isogenic HCT116p53(-/-) cells, including unhindered S-phase entry despite DNA damage. Surprisingly, E1B-55K-expressing cells were more sensitive to drug treatment than parental cells. Compared to HCT116 cells, HCT116p53(-/-) cells were more susceptible to both doxorubicin and etoposide, and E1B-55K expression had no effects on drug treatment. E1B-55K expression increased the rate of cell proliferation in HCT116 but not in HCT116p53(-/-) cells. Thus, deregulation of p53-mediated cell cycle control by E1B-55K probably underlies sensitization of HCT116 cells to anticancer drugs. Consistently, E1B-55K expression in A549, A172, and HepG2 cells, all containing wild-type (wt) p53, also enhanced etoposide-induced cytotoxicity, whereas in p53-null H1299 cells, E1B-55K had no effects. We generated several E1B-55K mutants with mutations at positions occupied by the conserved Phe/Trp/His residues. Most of these mutants showed no or reduced binding to p53, although some of them could still stabilize p53, suggesting that binding might not be essential for E1B-55K-induced p53 stabilization. Despite heightened p53 protein levels in cells expressing certain E1B-55K mutants, p53 activity was largely suppressed. Furthermore, most of these E1B-55K mutants could sensitize HCT116 cells to etoposide and doxorubicin. These results indicate that E1B-55K might have utility for enhancing chemotherapy.

Characterization of the proteases involved in the N-terminal clipping of glucagon-like-peptide-1-antibody fusion proteins.

In an attempt to develop high producing mammalian cell lines expressing glucagon-like-peptide-1-antibody fusion proteins (GLP-1), we have noted that the N-terminal GLP-1 portion of the fusion protein was susceptible to proteolytic degradation during cell culture, which resulted in an inactive product. The majority of the N-terminal clipped product appeared to be due to the removal of the entire biologically active peptide (30 amino acids) from the intact molecule. A number of parameters that influenced the degradative process were investigated. Additionally, protease inhibitors specific for each class of protease were tested. Results suggested that one or more serine-threonine class of protease(s) were involved in this process and inhibitors that are specific for this class of protease, including benzamidine hydrochloride could significantly inhibit the proteolytic degradation of the fusion proteins. Identification of the specific proteases involved in this process by shotgun proteomics methodology will pave the way for engineering the CHOK1SV cell line which will serve as a superior host for the production of future fusion protein products.

Identification of two independent SUMO-interacting motifs in Daxx: evolutionary conservation from Drosophila to humans and their biochemical functions.

Daxx is essential for embryonic development and implicated in apoptosis and transcriptional regulation. It is found only in the animal kingdom and appears to arise first in insects. In the Drosophila genus, the Daxx orthologs are much larger than those in other species. Here we show that in addition to a conserved core of approximately 200 residues, Daxx possesses several conserved domains and two essentially invariable short SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs), each located at one or the other terminus of the protein. Both can independently interact with SUMO. The Daxx I7/733K double mutant with one mutation in each of the two SIMs no longer interacts with SUMO. Daxx interacts with Ubc9 and this interaction strictly requires at least one SIM. Interestingly, the Ubc9 H20D mutation that abolishes non-covalent Ubc9-SUMO interaction also interrupts Daxx-Ubc9 interaction. Thus, SUMO serves as the intermediate for Daxx-Ubc9 interaction. Surprisingly, Daxx I7/733K double mutant could still colocalize with PML. Furthermore, wt Daxx also strongly colocalizes with PMLDeltaS mutant, in which all three sumoylation sites are mutated, whereas PMLDeltaS only weakly colocalizes with Daxx I7/733K mutant, suggesting that SIM-SUMO interaction is not essential for but enhances PML-Daxx interaction. Remarkably, Daxx strongly stimulates c-Jun-mediated transcription and both SIMs are required for this stimulation. PML also activates c-Jun, which requires all three sumoylation sites. Coexpression of Daxx and PML revealed that they independently regulate c-Jun, with Daxx exerting a dominant role. These results suggest that the conserved SIMs are involved in mediating protein-protein interactions that underlie Daxx's diverse cellular functions.

Repression of p53-mediated transcription by adenovirus E1B 55-kDa does not require corepressor mSin3A and histone deacetylases.

The Ad E1B 55-kDa protein (E1B) is a potent transcriptional repressor. In vitro biochemical studies revealed that direct p53-E1B interaction is essential for E1B to block p53-activated transcription and a corepressor may be involved. To understand how E1B represses p53-mediated transcription in vivo, we expressed E1B in several tumor cell lines that express wild type p53. Here we show that E1B strongly suppresses the expression of p53 target genes such as p21 and Puma-alpha in normal growth conditions or after cells were treated with p53-activating chemotherapeutic agents, suggesting that E1B-mediated gene repression is dominant and cannot be reversed via p53 activation. Interestingly, we found that E1B binds to corepressor mSin3A. Mutagenesis analysis indicated that the sequence motif "LHLLA" near the NH(2) terminus of E1B is responsible for mSin3A binding, and this motif is conserved among E1B proteins from different Ad serotypes. The conserved paired amphipathic helix domain 1 of mSin3A is critical for mSin3A-E1B interaction. Surprisingly, E1B mutants that cannot bind to mSin3A can still repress p53 target genes, indicating that it is not the corepressor required for E1B-mediated gene repression. In support of this notion, repression of p53 target genes by E1B is insensitive to HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A. We further show that both the NH(2)- and COOH-terminal domains of E1B are required for the repression function. Therefore, E1B employs a unique repression mechanism to block p53-mediated transcription.

An EBF3-mediated transcriptional program that induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

In a genome-wide screen for putative tumor suppressor genes, the EBF3 locus on the human chromosome 10q26.3 was found to be deleted or methylated in 73% of the examined cases of brain tumors. EBF3 is expressed in normal brain but is silenced in brain tumors. Therefore, it is suggested that EBF3 is a tumor suppressor. However, it remains unknown whether inactivation of EBF3 locus also occurs in other types of tumors and what functions of EBF3 underlie EBF3-mediated tumor suppression. We show here that expression of EBF3 resulted in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors was profoundly affected with early activation and then repression of p21(cip1/waf1) and persistent activation of both p27(kip1) and p57(kip2), whereas genes involved in cell survival and proliferation were suppressed. EBF3 bound directly to p21(cip1/waf1) promoter and regulated transcription from both p21(cip1/waf1) and p27(kip1) promoters in reporter assays. Apoptosis occurred 48 hours after EBF3 expression with caspase-3 activation. Silencing of the EBF3 locus was observed in brain, colorectal, breast, liver, and bone tumor cell lines and its reactivation was achieved on treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A in a significant portion of these tumor cells. Therefore, EBF3 regulates a transcriptional program underlying a putative tumor suppression pathway.