Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(6): 1402-1411.e3, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been practiced as an alternative for both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting, specifically in high-risk patients. More recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expanded coverage for TCAR in standard surgical risk patients if done within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative TCAR surveillance project. A few registry studies (primarily from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative) compared the early and up to 1-year outcomes of TCAR vs CEA or transfemoral carotid artery stenting. There is no large single-center study that reported late clinical outcomes. The present study compares intermediate clinical outcomes of TCAR vs CEA. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed collected data from TCAR surveillance project patients enrolled in our institution and compare it with CEA patients done by the same providers at the same time period. The primary outcome was combined perioperative stroke/death and late stroke/death. Secondary outcomes included combined stroke, death, and myocardial infarction, cranial nerve injury (CNI), and bleeding. Propensity matching was done to analyze outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate freedom from stroke, stroke/death, and ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis. RESULTS: We analyzed 646 procedures (637 patients) (404 CEA, 242 TCAR). There was no significant difference in the indications for carotid intervention. However, TCAR patients had more high-risk criteria, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and renal failure. There was no significant differences between CEA vs TCAR in 30-day perioperative stroke (1% vs 2%), stroke/death rate (1% vs 3%; P = .0849), or major hematomas (2% vs 2%). The rate of CNI was significantly different (5% for CEA vs 1% for TCAR; P = .0138). At late follow-up (2 years), the rate of stroke was 1% vs 4% (P = .0273), stroke/death 8% vs 15% (P = .008), ≥80 % restenosis 0.5% vs 3% (P = .0139) for CEA patients vs TCAR patients, respectively. After matching 242 CEAs and 242 TCARs, the perioperative stroke rate was 1% for CEA vs 2% for TCAR (P = .5037), the stroke/death rate was 2% vs 3% (P = .2423), and the CNI rate was 3% vs 1% (P = .127). At late follow-up, rates of stroke were 1% for CEA vs 4% for TCAR (P = .0615) and stroke/death were 8% vs 15% (P = .0345). The rate of ≥80% restenosis was 0.9% for CEA vs 3% for TCAR (P = .099). The rates of freedom from stroke at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for CEA vs TCAR were 99%, 99%, 99%, and 99% vs 97%, 95%, 93% and 93%, respectively (P = .0806); stroke/death were 94%, 90%, 87%, and 86% vs 93%, 87%, 76%, and 75%, respectively (P = .0529); and ≥80% restenosis were 100%, 99%, 98%, and 98% vs 97%, 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively (P = .1132). CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity-matched analysis, both CEA and TCAR have similar perioperative clinical outcomes. However, CEA was superior to TCAR for the rates of late stroke/death and had a somewhat lower rate of ≥80% restenosis at 2 years, but this difference was not statistically significant.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Estenose das Carótidas/mortalidade , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Recidiva , Traumatismos dos Nervos Cranianos/etiologia
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 203: 157-160, 2023 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37494865

RESUMO

We present a case of a 72-year-old-male with an ascending aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following Dacron graft repair of an iatrogenic ascending aortic dissection that occurred during an open mitral valve repair, which was successfully treated with endovascular graft placement. In conclusion, this uncommon finding demonstrates a complex pathology and additional clinical examples of the versatility of endovascular stent grafts within the ascending aorta.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Aorta Torácica , Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 236(4): 668-674, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728406

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been proposed as a alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. Recently Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expanded coverage for TCAR to include standard surgical risk patients within the Society of Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative TCAR Surveillance Project. Few single centers compared the clinical outcome of TCAR with CEA. This study compares 30-day perioperative clinical outcomes between TCAR and CEA. STUDY DESIGN: This is retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the TCAR Surveillance Project of TCAR patients enrolled in our institution and compared with CEAs done in the same time/with the same providers. The primary outcome was stroke and/or death. Secondary outcomes included stroke, death, MI, cranial nerve injury, bleeding, and others. Propensity matching was done to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: The study analyzed 501 patients (347 CEA, 154 TCAR). There were no significant differences in symptomatic status (43% for CEA vs 38% for TCAR, p = 0.303). TCAR had more patients with hypertension (p = 0.04), coronary artery disease (p = 0.028), and congestive heart failure (p = 0.039). The 30-day perioperative complication rates for CEA vs TCAR were as follows: stroke 1% vs 3% (p = 0.142), stroke/death 1% vs 3% (p = 0.185), MI 0.6% vs 0.7% (p = 1), death 0.6% vs 0% (p = 1), stroke/death/MI 2% vs 4% (p = 0.233), cranial nerve injury 4% vs 2% (p = 0.412), and major hematoma (requiring reintervention) 2% vs 3% (p = 1). After matching 154 CEA patients and 154 TCAR, 30-day perioperative complication rates were as follows: stroke 2% vs 3% (p = 0.723), stroke/death 3% vs 3% (p = 1), death 1.3% vs 0% (p = 0.498), MI 0.7% vs 0.7% (p = 1), and stroke/death/MI 3% vs 4% (p = 0.759). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that using propensity match analysis, both CEA and TCAR have similar 30-day perioperative outcomes. Further long-term data are needed.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Infarto do Miocárdio , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents/efeitos adversos , Medicare , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Artérias
4.
Vascular ; 31(6): 1161-1172, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35634873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the ENROUTE system (Silk Road) has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative to both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Two large registries (ROADSTER 1 and ROADSTER 2) have shown that TCAR has acceptable/low rates of perioperative stroke/death. This study will analyze the 30-day perioperative and 1-year clinical outcomes from a single-center. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from SVS/VQI TCAR surveillance project (TSP) of 100 consecutive patients (102 TCAR procedures) done in our institution. These procedures were done for high-risk patients for CEA, which included anatomical (previous CEA, high cervical lesion, neck radiation, stoma, arch type, etc.), physiological (CHF, severe coronary artery disease, COPD on O2 therapy, etc.) and combined anatomical/physiological reasons. These procedures were done by vascular surgeons after receiving the appropriate training. The perioperative stroke, death, and MI rates were analyzed. Kaplan Meyer analysis was used to estimate rate of freedom from stroke/death and the incidence of ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis at 1 year. RESULTS: 100 consecutive high-risk patients for CEA included: 38% anatomical, 44% physiological, and 18% combined anatomical and physiological reasons. The mean age was 72.5 years (range 52-90 years). Indications for TCAR were 34% for symptomatic lesions (TIA/stroke) and 66% for asymptomatic lesions. Mean ipsilateral treated stenosis was 80.4%. Contralateral ≥50% stenosis/occlusion was present in 31% of patients. Technical success rate was 100%. 92% had pre-stenting PTA and 26% had post-stenting PTA. The mean flow reversal time was 8.5 min (range 3-26 min). The 30-day perioperative stroke rate was 2.9% (1/67, 1.5% for asymptomatic patients), the stroke/death rate was 2.9%, and stroke/death and MI rate was 3.9% (4/102). Other perioperative complications included cranial nerve injury 3/102 (2.9%), carotid artery dissection (2%), and major hematoma (necessitated operation evacuation) (5.9%). Freedom from stroke rates and stroke/death rates at 1 year were: 90% and 89%. Freedom from ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis rates at 1 year were 82% and 90%, respectively. None of these restenosis were symptomatic except two (2/13). Freedom from reintervention rate at 1 year was 98%. CONCLUSION: Although the perioperative events were somewhat higher than what has been reported in previous registries, TCAR for patients who are high-risk for CEA has a low perioperative stroke and stroke/death rates with satisfactory outcome at 1 year. Further long-term data is probably needed to verify long-term outcome.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Reestenose Coronária , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Infarto do Miocárdio , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reestenose Coronária/complicações , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Artérias
5.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(4): 694-697, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36325310

RESUMO

The incidence of traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injury is infrequent but is associated with high mortality. No clear and current society-based guidelines are available to dictate the role of endovascular therapy. In the present case report, we have described a unique clinical presentation of a patient in extremis after emergent exploratory laparotomy who had experienced an IVC injury that could not be controlled with open surgery. The IVC injury was treated with an endovascular approach with a Gore TAG endograft (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). We have reported a technique for successful treatment of a complex IVC injury, with the aim of adding to the current body of literature supporting the use of endovascular approaches.

6.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(6): 1634-1641, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35835320

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of subclavian steal (defined as retrograde/bidirectional vertebral artery flow) in the general population and in patients undergoing cerebrovascular duplex ultrasound (CDUS) examinations is variable. This is the largest study to date to analyze the incidence of duplex-suggested subclavian steal in 5615 CDUS examinations over a 1-year period and to examine its clinical implications. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: All consecutive CDUS examinations performed over a 1-year period were analyzed for the presence of subclavian steal. Indications of testing, presence of posterior cerebral circulation/subclavian steal symptoms, and any interventions for subclavian steal were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 171 of 5615 (3.1%) CDUS examinations were found to have subclavian steal (duplex-suggested). One hundred seventeen (2.1%) had retrograde flow and 54 (1%) had bidirectional flow. Of 171, 104 (60.8%) were left sided. Indications for CDUS were post-carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting surveillance in 39 patients (22.8%), surveillance for progression of carotid stenosis in 76 patients (44.4%), transient ischemic attack/stroke in 26 patients (15%), asymptomatic screening/carotid bruit in 18 patients (10.5%), and isolated posterior cerebral circulation symptoms in 12 patients (7%). A total of 63% patients had associated >50% carotid stenosis. The mean arm Doppler pressure gradient was 32.2 mm Hg for asymptomatic patients vs 37 mm Hg for patients with posterior circulation symptoms (P = .3254). There were significant differences between the mean systolic arm pressure for patients with retrograde vs antegrade vs bidirectional flow (105 mm Hg vs 146 mm Hg vs 134 mm Hg, respectively, P < .0001). All patients with retrograde flow had >50% subclavian stenosis or occlusion (100 of 117 had subtotal/total occlusion) except for one patient. Meanwhile, 52 of 54 patients with bidirectional flow had >50% subclavian stenosis (6 of 54 with subtotal/total occlusion), whereas two patients were normal/<50% stenosis (P < .0001). Overall, 26 of 171 patients (15.2%) had interventions for disabling symptoms. Eleven of 26 of all interventions were for disabling arm claudication, and only 10 of 171 patients (5.8%) were intervened for disabling posterior circulation symptoms with complete resolution of symptoms in all except one. At a late follow-up with a mean of 18 months (range: 1-37 months), there was no late major stroke with only two lacunar infarcts (not subclavian steal related). There were also seven late deaths, none stroke related. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of subclavian steal in patients who undergo CDUS is relatively rare. Most of these patients are asymptomatic and can be treated conservatively, and only a few may need intervention for disabling symptoms with good symptom resolution.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Síndrome do Roubo Subclávio , Humanos , Artéria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Stents/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Roubo Subclávio/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Roubo Subclávio/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(6): 1596-1602.e1, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35835321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the incidence of ≥50% and ≥80% carotid in-stent stenosis. In the present study, we analyzed the rate of progression of in-stent stenosis and clinical outcomes with longer follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 450 patients who had undergone transfemoral carotid artery stenting with longer follow-up (mean, 70 months). The progression of in-stent stenosis was defined as stenosis advancing to a higher severity of disease (ie, from <50% to ≥50% and from ≥50% to ≥80%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of progression from <50% to ≥50% and ≥50% to ≥80%, the overall rates of ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent stenosis, and survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 70.3 months (range, 1-222 months), 121 of 446 patients (27%) had had progression to ≥50% and 39 (8.7%) to ≥80% in-stent stenosis. Of the 406 patients whose first duplex ultrasound findings were normal or showed in-stent stenosis of <50%, 82 had had progression from normal or <50% to ≥50% in-stent stenosis at a mean of 51.7 months (range, 1-213 months). Of the 121 patients with ≥50% stenosis, 14 (11.6%) had experienced progression to ≥80% at a mean of 33.6 months (range, 6-89 months). Of the 82 patients with progression from <50 to ≥50%, 10 (12%) had experienced a neurologic event (eight transient ischemic attacks [TIAs] and two strokes). Of the 14 with progression from ≥50% to ≥80%, 2 (14.3%) had experienced a TIA, and the remaining patients were asymptomatic. Of the 39 patients with ≥80% in-stent stenosis, 9 (23%) had experienced a neurologic event (eight TIAs and one contralateral stroke). Overall, 13 of the 121 patients with late ≥50% restenosis (10.7%) had experienced a neurologic event (10 ipsilateral TIA, 2 ipsilateral stroke, and 1 contralateral stroke. Thus, 12 of 446 patients (2.7%) had experienced an ipsilateral TIA or stroke at a mean follow-up of 70 months. The rates of freedom from <50% to ≥50% in-stent stenosis progression were 93%, 85%, 78%, and 66% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. The rates of freedom from progression from ≥50% to ≥80% in-stent stenosis were 89%, 81%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The overall rates of freedom from ≥50% in-stent stenosis and ≥80% in-stent stenosis were 86%, 77%, 71%, and 59% and 96%, 93%, 91%, and 84% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Finally, the stroke survival rates were 95%, 80%, 63%, and 31% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of progression of carotid in-stent stenosis was modest, with a low incidence of stroke events. Therefore, the use of duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid artery stenting should be selective and its benefits and utility perhaps reevaluated.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco
8.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(2): 261-264, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35586676

RESUMO

We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (TASC-D) and an incidental finding of a left sided inferior vena cava, discovered on the preoperative computed tomography scan. This uncommon congenital finding can create intraoperative challenges to the vascular surgeon. In this case report, we have described this anatomic variant and elaborated on our surgical technique to suggest a few tips and tricks for addressing these cases.

9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 80: 392.e1-392.e4, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644629

RESUMO

This is a report of a 45-year-old female with thoracic central venous obstruction (TCVO) and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency requiring an implanted port for infusions. The azygos vein was used for catheter access in the setting of an occluded right internal jugular vein, bilateral innominate, and superior vena cava. A literature review examines the etiology of TCVO and superior vena cava syndrome (SVC), as well as the potential benefits and complications for using the azygos vein in patients with TCVO requiring port or catheter venous access.


Assuntos
Veia Ázigos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Deficiência de alfa 1-Antitripsina/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/etiologia , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Deficiência de alfa 1-Antitripsina/terapia
10.
J Surg Educ ; 76(3): 694-699, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30318298

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify program-specific critical factors in a student's path to general surgery and how different factors contribute to our high rate of matriculation. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted focusing on critical factors in student's decision processes to pursue general surgery. Three investigators independently evaluated the transcripts and identified recurring themes based on phenomenological qualitative methods until saturation was achieved. Inter-rater reliability was determined. SETTING: The study took place at Tulane University School of Medicine, an academic medical center in New Orleans, Louisiana. PARTICIPANTS: Current fourth-year students from our medical school, applying into general surgery, were interviewed for the study. RESULTS: Twelve of 21 students were interviewed. The most common factor cited was the positive effect of clinically based anatomy and of having surgeons in anatomy (81%). Other factors mentioned included interest before medical school, clerkship experience, and mentor interactions; Kappa was 0.76 or higher for each theme. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically focused anatomy course led by surgeons at our institution has a significant impact on a general surgery career choice. With the constant evolution of the medical field, understanding what guides students toward a career in general surgery will better assist medical education planners in providing resources that will positively impact future classes.


Assuntos
Anatomia/educação , Escolha da Profissão , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Cirurgiões , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Louisiana , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...