EGF receptor function is required in late G(1) for cell cycle progression induced by bombesin and bradykinin.

We examined the role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase activation in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonist-induced mitogenesis in Swiss 3T3 and Rat-1 cells. Addition of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., tyrphostin AG-1478) abrogated bombesin-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation in Rat-1 cells but not in Swiss 3T3 cells, indicating the importance of cell context in determining the role of EGFR in ERK activation. In striking contrast, treatment with tyrphostin AG-1478 markedly (~70%) inhibited DNA synthesis induced by bombesin in both Swiss 3T3 and Rat-1 cells. Similar inhibition of bombesin-induced DNA synthesis in Swiss 3T3 cells was obtained using four structurally different inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase. Furthermore, kinetic analysis indicates that EGFR function is necessary for bombesin-induced mitogenesis in mid-late G(1) in both Swiss 3T3 and Rat-1 cells. Our results indicate that EGFR kinase activity is necessary in mid-late G(1) for promoting the accumulation of cyclins D1 and E and implicate EGFR function in the coupling of GPCR signaling to the activation of the cell cycle.

[D-Arg(1),D-Trp(5,7,9),Leu(11)]Substance P inhibits bombesin-induced mitogenic signal transduction mediated by both G(q) and G(12) in Swiss 3T3cells.

Substance P (SP) analogues including [d-Arg(1),d-Trp(5,7,9), Leu(11)]SP are broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists and potential anticancer agents, but their mechanism of action is not fully understood. Here, we examined the mechanism of action of [d-Arg(1), d-Trp(5,7,9),Leu(11)]SP as an inhibitor of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal transduction and cellular DNA synthesis in Swiss 3T3 cells. Addition of [d-Arg(1),d-Trp(5,7,9), Leu(11)]SP, at 10 micrometer, caused a striking rightward shift in the dose-response curves of DNA synthesis induced by bombesin, bradykinin, or vasopressin and markedly inhibited the activation of p42(mapk) (ERK-2) and p44(mapk) (ERK-1) induced by these GPCR agonists. In addition, this SP analogue also prevented the protein kinase C-dependent activation of protein kinase D induced by these agonists. [d-Arg(1),d-Trp(5,7,9),Leu(11)]SP, at a concentration (10 micrometer) that inhibited these G(q)-mediated events, also prevented GPCR agonist-induced responses mediated through the G proteins of the G(12) subfamily. These include bombesin-induced assembly of focal adhesions, formation of parallel arrays of actin stress fibers, increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), p130(Cas), and paxillin, and formation of a complex between FAK and Src. We conclude that [d-Arg(1),d-Trp(5,7,9),Leu(11)]SP acts as a mitogenic antagonist of neuropeptide GPCRs blocking signal transduction via both G(q) and G(12).