Effect of salinity on embryo-larval development of yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides (Reeve, 1854) in laboratory.

Abstract: This study assessed the effect of salinity on embryonic development, larval growth and survival of the yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides in laboratory. Embryos and larvae of M. mactroides were submitted and maintained at four different salinities: 20, 25, 30 and 35 ppt, to determine optimal conditions for the species. Through descriptive analysis, the results showed that the embryos tolerate salinities between 25 - 35 ppt, presenting fast metamorphoses at salinities 30 and 35 ppt, during experimental period of 27 hours. The same tolerance pattern was observed in larval stage (25 - 35 ppt), showing a better development in salinity of 35 ppt. This result is verified in biometric analyzes of height and length of the shells and survival rate, with higher averages in treatments with salinity 35 ppt. The experimental period of this stage lasted 27 days, when the larvae were able to settle. These results indicate that embryos and larvae of M. mactroides tolerate salinities between (25-35 ppt), with the best growth and survival on high salinities being recommended to better yields in laboratory.

Embryo and larval development of the yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides (Reeve, 1854) (Mesodesmatidae) in laboratory.

The yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides (Reeve, 1854) is a sand mollusc with historical and socioeconomic importance in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina. A guaranteed form to access a successful reestablishment of the species in their natural environment is directly linked to their reproduction biology. Then, our report introduces the embryonic and larval development of the yellow clam reared in laboratory for such purposes. M. mactroides broodstock were selected as specimens who possess a mean total shell length and weight of 66 ± 3.82 mm and 27.15 ± 4.07 g for an afterwards spawn induction through stripping technique. Regarding the embryonic development, newly fertilized oocytes exhibited a mean diameter of 51.20 ± 6.64 µm. The first polar corpuscle, trochophores and D-veliger appeared at 20 min, 18 and 24 h after fertilization, respectively. Umbonate and pediveliger larvae were noticed on the 8th and 25th day, respectively, with complete metamorphosis occurring only at the 27th day, when all larvae were retained in a 200 µm nylon mesh. Therefore, with that basic understanding of the embryonic and larval development of M. mactroides in the laboratory, forwards studies will focus in establish a technological package for this species.

Valor del «test de bipedestación» en el diagnóstico y la evaluación de la respuesta al tratamiento con bloqueadores beta en el síndrome de QT largo / Value of the 'standing test' in the diagnosis and evaluation of beta-blocker therapy response in long QT syndrome

Introducción y objetivos: Los pacientes con síndrome de QT largo (SQTL) tienen una adaptación anormal del QT a los cambios bruscos de la frecuencia cardiaca producidos con la bipedestación. Este trabajo estudia la utilidad del test de bipedestación en una cohorte de pacientes con SQTL y evalúa si el fenómeno de «mala adaptación» del QT se normaliza con el tratamiento con bloqueadores beta. Métodos: Se realizó un electrocardiograma basal y otro inmediatamente tras la bipedestación a 36 pacientes con SQTL (6 [17%] con QTL1, 20 [56%] con QTL2, 3 [8%] con QTL7 y 7 [19%] con genotipo no identificado) y 41 controles. Se midió el intervalo QT corregido (QTc) basal (QTcdecúbito) y tras la bipedestación (QTcbipedestación) y el incremento del QTc (ΔQTc = QTcbipedestación - QTcdecúbito). Se repitió el test en 26 de los pacientes bajo tratamiento con bloqueadores beta. Resultados: El QTcbipedestación y el ΔQTc fueron mayores en el grupo de SQTL que en el grupo control (QTcbipedestación, 528 ± 46 frente a 420 ± 15 ms; p < 0,0001; ΔQTc, 78 ± 40 frente a 8 ± 13 ms; p < 0,0001). No hubo diferencias significativas entre los pacientes con QTL1 y QTL2. Los pacientes con SQTL presentaron patrones típicos del segmento ST-onda T tras la bipedestación. Las curvas receiver operating characteristic del QTcbipedestación y ΔQTc mostraron un incremento significativo del valor diagnóstico comparadas con la del QTcdecúbito(área bajo la curva de ambos, 0,99 frente a 0,85; p < 0,001). El tratamiento con bloqueadores beta atenuó la respuesta a la bipedestación de los pacientes con SQTL (en tratamiento, QTcbipedestación, 440 ± 32 ms [p < 0,0001] y ΔQTc, 14 ± 16 ms [p < 0,0001]). Conclusiones: La evaluación del intervalo QTc tras la bipedestación proporciona un alto rendimiento diagnóstico y podría ser de gran utilidad en la monitorización del tratamiento con bloqueadores beta en los pacientes con SQTL (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Patients with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) have an abnormal QT adaptation to sudden changes in heart rate provoked by standing. The present study sought to evaluate the standing test in a cohort of LQTS patients and to assess if this QT maladaptation phenomenon is ameliorated by beta-blocker therapy. Methods: Electrographic assessments were performed at baseline and immediately after standing in 36 LQTS patients (6 LQT1 [17%], 20 LQT2 [56%], 3 LQT7 [8%], 7 unidentified-genotype patients [19%]) and 41 controls. The corrected QT interval (QTc) was measured at baseline (QTcsupine) and immediately after standing (QTcstanding); the QTc change from baseline (ΔQTc) was calculated as QTcstanding - QTcsupine. The test was repeated in 26 patients receiving beta-blocker therapy. Results: Both QTcstanding and ΔQTc were significantly higher in the LQTS group than in controls (QTcstanding, 528 ± 46 ms vs 420 ± 15 ms, P < .0001; ΔQTc, 78 ± 40 ms vs 8 ± 13 ms, P < .0001). No significant differences were noted between LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Typical ST-T wave patterns appeared after standing in LQTS patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves of QTcstanding and ΔQTc showed a significant increase in diagnostic value compared with the QTcsupine (area under the curve for both, 0.99 vs 0.85; P < .001). Beta-blockers attenuated the response to standing in LQTS patients (QTcstanding, 440 ± 32 ms, P < .0001; ΔQTc, 14 ± 16 ms, P < .0001). Conclusions: Evaluation of the QTc after the simple maneuver of standing shows a high diagnostic performance and could be important for monitoring the effects of beta-blocker therapy in LQTS patients (AU)

Value of the "Standing Test" in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Beta-blocker Therapy Response in Long QT Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) have an abnormal QT adaptation to sudden changes in heart rate provoked by standing. The present study sought to evaluate the standing test in a cohort of LQTS patients and to assess if this QT maladaptation phenomenon is ameliorated by beta-blocker therapy. METHODS: Electrographic assessments were performed at baseline and immediately after standing in 36 LQTS patients (6 LQT1 [17%], 20 LQT2 [56%], 3 LQT7 [8%], 7 unidentified-genotype patients [19%]) and 41 controls. The corrected QT interval (QTc) was measured at baseline (QTcsupine) and immediately after standing (QTcstanding); the QTc change from baseline (ΔQTc) was calculated as QTcstanding - QTcsupine. The test was repeated in 26 patients receiving beta-blocker therapy. RESULTS: Both QTcstanding and ΔQTc were significantly higher in the LQTS group than in controls (QTcstanding, 528 ± 46ms vs 420 ± 15ms, P < .0001; ΔQTc, 78 ± 40ms vs 8 ± 13ms, P < .0001). No significant differences were noted between LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Typical ST-T wave patterns appeared after standing in LQTS patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves of QTcstanding and ΔQTc showed a significant increase in diagnostic value compared with the QTcsupine (area under the curve for both, 0.99 vs 0.85; P < .001). Beta-blockers attenuated the response to standing in LQTS patients (QTcstanding, 440 ± 32ms, P < .0001; ΔQTc, 14 ± 16ms, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the QTc after the simple maneuver of standing shows a high diagnostic performance and could be important for monitoring the effects of beta-blocker therapy in LQTS patients.