Publication analysis of the contact lens field: What are the current topics of interest? / Análisis de publicaciones en el campo de las lentes de contacto: ¿cuáles son las cuestiones de interés actuales?

Purpose: To determine the main current research interests of scientists working in the contact lens field. Methods: All articles published in the 2011 issues of all journals included in the Journal Citation Reports subject category Ophthalmology were inspected to expose those papers related to the contact lens field. Information regarding source journal was obtained and authorship details were recorded to determine the top most prolific authors, institutions and countries. A comprehensive list of key words was compiled to generate a two-dimensional term map in which the frequency of occurrence of a particular term is defined by label size and the distance between two terms is an indication of the relatedness of these terms, based on their co-occurrences within groups of key words. Clusters of related terms were also identified. Results: Visual examination of all articles uncovered a total of 156 papers, published in 28 different journals. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Eye & Contact Lens and Optometry and Vision Science had 27 articles each. The most prolific authors and institutions revealed the predominance of countries with long research tradition in the contact lens field. Ten different word clusters or areas of interest were identified, including both traditional, yet unresolved issues (e.g., comfort or dry eye), and the latest research efforts (e.g., myopia control). Conclusions: These findings, which revealed contact lenses to be a fertile area of research, may be of relevance to new researchers as well as to those interested in exploring the latest research trends in this scientific discipline (AU)

Objetivo: Determinar los principales intereses actuales de los científicos que trabajan en el campo de las lentes de contacto. Métodos: Se revisaron todos los artículos publicados en 2011 en las ediciones de todas las publicaciones incluidas en Journal Citation Reports, en la categoría de Oftalmología, en relación a las lentes de contacto. Se obtuvo información relativa a la fuente de la publicación, y se registraron datos sobre la autoría, para determinar los principales autores, instituciones y países más prolíficos. Se compiló una amplia lista de palabras clave para generar un mapa terminológico bidimensional en el que la frecuencia de ocurrencia de un término particular se definía mediante el tamaño de la etiqueta, siendo la distancia entre dos términos un indicador del parentesco de dichos términos, basado en las co-ocurrencias entre grupos de palabras clave. También se identificaron grupos de términos relacionados. Resultados: El examen visual de todos los artículos descubrió un total de 156 documentos, publicados en 28 publicaciones diferentes. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Eye & Contact Lens y Optometry and Vision Science incluyeron 27 artículos cada una. Los autores e instituciones más prolíficos revelaron la predominancia de países con amplia tradición investigadora en el campo de las lentes de contacto. Se identificaron diez diferentes grupos o áreas de interés mundiales, incluyendo cuestiones tanto tradicionales, aunque aún sin resolver (por ejemplo, confort u ojo seco), como los últimos esfuerzos investigadores (por ejemplo, control de la miopía). Conclusiones: Estos hallazgos, que revelaron que las lentes de contacto eran un área fértil de investigación, pueden resultar pertinentes para los nuevos investigadores, así como para aquellas personas interesadas en explorar las últimas tendencias investigadoras en esta disciplina científica (AU)

Publication analysis of the contact lens field: what are the current topics of interest?

PURPOSE: To determine the main current research interests of scientists working in the contact lens field. METHODS: All articles published in the 2011 issues of all journals included in the Journal Citation Reports subject category Ophthalmology were inspected to expose those papers related to the contact lens field. Information regarding source journal was obtained and authorship details were recorded to determine the top most prolific authors, institutions and countries. A comprehensive list of key words was compiled to generate a two-dimensional term map in which the frequency of occurrence of a particular term is defined by label size and the distance between two terms is an indication of the relatedness of these terms, based on their co-occurrences within groups of key words. Clusters of related terms were also identified. RESULTS: Visual examination of all articles uncovered a total of 156 papers, published in 28 different journals. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Eye & Contact Lens and Optometry and Vision Science had 27 articles each. The most prolific authors and institutions revealed the predominance of countries with long research tradition in the contact lens field. Ten different word clusters or areas of interest were identified, including both traditional, yet unresolved issues (e.g., comfort or dry eye), and the latest research efforts (e.g., myopia control). CONCLUSIONS: These findings, which revealed contact lenses to be a fertile area of research, may be of relevance to new researchers as well as to those interested in exploring the latest research trends in this scientific discipline.

Citation parameters of contact lens-related articles published in the ophthalmic literature.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at exploring the citation parameters of contact lenses articles published in the Ophthalmology thematic category of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). METHODS: The Thompson Reuters Web of Science database was accessed to record bibliometric information and citation parameters of all journals listed under the Ophthalmology area of the 2011 JCR edition, including the journals with main publication interests in the contact lens field. In addition, the same database was used to unveil all contact lens-related articles published in 2011 in the same thematic area, whereupon differences in citation parameters between those articles published in contact lens and non-contact lens-related journals were explored. RESULTS: Significant differences in some bibliometric indicators such as half-life and overall citation count were found between contact lens-related journals (shorter half-life and fewer citations) and the median values for the Ophthalmology thematic area of the JCR. Visual examination of all Ophthalmology journals uncovered a total of 156 contact lens-related articles, published in 28 different journals, with 27 articles each for Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Eye & Contact Lens, and Optometry and Vision Science. Significant differences in citation parameters were encountered between those articles published in contact lens and non-contact lens source journals. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, which disclosed contact lenses to be a fertile area of research, may be of interest to researchers and institutions. Differences in bibliometric indicators are of relevance to avoid unwanted bias when conducting between- and within-discipline comparisons of articles, journals, and researchers.