Perforación traqueal diferida tras cirugía tiroidea en un paciente con radioterapia cervical.

Tracheal perforation is a rare complication of thyroid surgery. A 36-year-old man with previous neck radiotherapy due to a nasopharyngeal cancer. After right hemithyoidectomy and isthmusectomy, the patient presented a tracheal perforation. The diagnosis was confirmed with computed tomography and bronchoscopy. A conservative management was performed with drainage and antibiotic therapy, and the evolution was satisfactory. If recognized at the time of the surgery, perforations should be closed primarily. Delayed perforations will be treated with an emergency surgery or conservatively depending on the clinical situation of the patient.

La perforación traqueal es una rara complicación de la cirugía tiroidea. Varón de 36 años con antecedente de radioterapia cervical por una neoplasia de cavum sometido a hemitiroidectomía derecha e istmectomía que durante el posoperatorio presentó una perforación traqueal confirmada por tomografía computarizada y broncoscopia. Se realizó manejo conservador con drenaje y antibioticoterapia, evolucionando de forma favorable. Las perforaciones identificadas durante la cirugía deben ser reparadas intraoperatoriamente, mientras que las diferidas se tratarán de forma quirúrgica urgente o de manera conservadora en función de la situación clínica del paciente.

Risk Factors for Severe Anaphylaxis in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with severe anaphylaxis in children. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out a multicenter prospective observational study including children less than 18 years old diagnosed with anaphylaxis in 7 Spanish pediatric emergency departments (EDs) between May 2016 and April 2018. Children were considered to have severe anaphylaxis if they met one or more of the following criteria: requirement for 2 or more doses of epinephrine, clinically important biphasic reaction, endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit admission, and/or death. RESULTS: We included 453 episodes of anaphylaxis. Of these, 61 were classified as severe anaphylaxis (13.5%, 95% CI [10.6-16.9]): 53 (11.7%) required more than 1 dose of epinephrine, and there were 14 (3.1%) cases of clinically important biphasic reactions, 2 (0.4%) intubations in the ED, and 6 (1.3%) admissions to the intensive care unit. No patients died. In the multivariable regression, we identified 5 independent risk factors for severe anaphylaxis: history of asthma (P = .002; OR 2.705, 95% CI [1.431-5.113]), onset of the symptoms less than 5 minutes after the allergen exposure (P = .002; OR 2.619, 95% CI [1.410-4.866]), non-well appearance (P = .005; OR 2.973, 95% CI [1.380-6.405]), tachycardia (P = .014; OR 2.339, 95% CI [1.191-4.959]), and hypotension (P = .036; OR 3.725, 95% CI [1.087-12.762]). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood anaphylaxis is usually well controlled in the ED. Children with a history of asthma, rapid onset of the symptoms, who are non-well appearing, or have tachycardia or hypotension upon arrival to the ED are more likely to have severe episodes.

[Pneumoperitoneum due to splenic abscess: a diagnostic challenge. Case Report]. / Neumoperitoneo por absceso esplénico: un reto diagnóstico. Reporte de un caso.

BACKGROUND: Splenic abscess is a rare clinic entity, its incidence has increased due to the rising number of clinical conditions involving immunosuppression. Endocarditis is the most frequent cause, and gram-positive aerobes are the main causal agents. Its clinical presentation is non-specific and delays diagnosis. Computed tomography scan is the method of choice, and the treatment is based on antibiotics and drainage, radiological or surgical, involving splenectomy in special cases that require it. CLINICAL CASE: A 55-year-old man with abdominal pain and fever. The analysis revealed leukocytosis 14,000/mm3, prothrombin activity 53%, and metabolic acidosis. Computed tomography scan showed a peri-hepatic pneumoperitoneum, liquid fluid, and peri-splenic bubbles, and slight trabeculation of fat around the duodenal bulb with pneumoperitoneum in this area. Patient underwent a median laparotomy, finding a purulent peritonitis due to a ruptured abscess in the spleen, splenectomy was performed. Fluid culture showed polymorphonuclears, with no microorganisms identified. The patient progressed and was discharged on the 5th post-operative day. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic abscess is an uncommon condition, in which the diagnosis is delayed and mortality, in untreated patients, is high. Its association with pneumoperitoneum may confuse the diagnosis towards viscera perforation. Thus it must be suspected in the finding of unknown cause of pneumoperitoneum by complementary examinations. The treatment of choice is splenectomy, because the capsular rupture is the norm in all of them.