Semi-occlusive dressing versus surgery in fingertip injuries: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: No gold-standard treatment has been established for the management of distal digital amputation in Ishikawa zones II and III. The objective of this study was to compare the results of management of fingertip amputation by semi-occlusive dressing versus surgery. The principal hypothesis was that a semi-occlusive dressing results in better recovery of sensory function than a digital flap. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 44 patients: 23 managed conservatively with semi-occlusive dressing, and 21 surgically with digital flap. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 12 months. Mean healing time was 4.9 weeks in the semi-occlusive dressing group and 3.6 weeks in the surgery group. There was no significant difference between groups for sensory recovery of fine touch (p = 0.198) or 2-point discrimination (p = 0.961). No infections were reported in either group. Hook-nail deformity was more frequent in the semi-occlusive dressing group, particularly in case of amputation in zone III. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-occlusive dressing enabled satisfactory healing and sensitivity recovery without increasing the risk of infection. However, in zone III amputation, we advocate surgical treatment with a digital flap, due to poor trophicity and the frequency of hook-nail deformity seen with conservative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Influence of surgical performance on clinical outcome after osteosynthesis of distal radius fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical outcome after surgery depends on the surgeon's level of expertise or performance. The present study of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with anterior plate for distal radius fracture assessed whether clinical outcome correlated with surgeon performance. METHODS: The series included 30 distal radius fractures: 15 operated on by 4 level III surgeons (Group 1) and 15 by 4 level V surgeons (Group 2), utilizing the MIPO technique. The surgical performance of all 8 surgeons was assessed using the OSATS global rating scale. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 3 months' follow-up using the modified Mayo score (MMS), in 4 grades: 0-64 (poor), 65-79 (moderate), 80-89 (good), and 90-100 (excellent). The QuickDASH score (QDASH) was also calculated, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Median MMS was better for level V (75 = fair result) than level III surgeons (62 = poor result). Median QDASH score likewise was better in group 2 (9.1) than group 1 (22.7). In group 1, there were 2 paresthesias in the median nerve territory, 1 type-1 complex regional pain syndrome, and 1 hypoesthesia in the scar area. Mean correlation between the 2 scores was -0.68. Group 1 patients were on average 7 years older. The number of patients, number of surgeons and distribution of OA A and C fractures were almost identical in the two groups. On MMS, the overall result of the two groups was moderate (70.5), which can be explained by short mean follow-up. DISCUSSION: Quality of the clinical outcome on MMS and QDASH increased with surgical performance, with fewer complications. In the patients' interest, protocols for improving surgical performance should be implemented, for example, through deliberate practice.

Preliminary stage in the development of an artificial intelligence algorithm: Variations between 100 surgeons in phase annotation in a video of internal fixation of distal radius fracture.

INTRODUCTION: In order to be used naturally and widely, an artificial intelligence algorithm of phase detection in surgical videos presupposes an expert consensus defining phases. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to seek consensus in defining the various phases of a surgical technique in wrist traumatology. METHODS: Three thousand two hundred and twenty-nine surgeons were sent a video showing anterior plate fixation of the distal radius and a questionnaire on the number of phases they distinguished and the visual cues signaling the beginning of each phase. Three experimenters predefined the number of phases (5: installation, approach, fixation, verification, closure) and sub-phases (3a: introduction of plate; 3b: positioning distal screws; 3c: positioning proximal screws) and the cues signaling the beginning of each. The numbers of the responses per item were collected. RESULTS: Only 216 (6.7%) surgeons opened the questionnaire, and 100 answered all questions (3.1%). Most respondents claimed 5/5 expertise. Number of phases identified ranged between 3 and 10. More than two-thirds of respondents identified the same phase cue as defined by the 3 experimenters in most cases, except for "verification" and "positioning proximal screws". DISCUSSION: Surgical procedures comprise a succession of phases, the beginning or end of which can be defined by a precise visual cue on video, either beginning with the appearance of the cue or the disappearance of the cue defining the preceding phase. CONCLUSION: These cues need to be defined very precisely before attempting manual annotation of surgical videos in order to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Technique, Indications and Limitations of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Distal Radius Fractures and Malunions.

The minimally invasive flexor carpi radialis approach can be used for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. It offers the advantage of preserving ligamentotaxis, which facilitates the reduction and the small size of the scar improves the esthetic result of the procedure. It is indicated for extra-articular fractures of the distal radius. In the case of an intra-articular fracture, an arthroscopy may be associated. In the case of a proximal diaphyseal extension of the fracture, a second proximal approach can be added in order to use a longer plate. Relative contraindications are comminuted articular fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. Functional and radiological results are comparable to those obtained with the extented flexor carpi radialis approach. A conversion of the procedure for a larger incision is always possible in the case of a difficult reduction.

Methods of assessment of the level of surgeons for minimally invasive fixation of distal radius fractures: "expertise" versus "performance".

INTRODUCTION: The results of surgical techniques vary depending on the level of the surgeon's experience. The level of expertise can be evaluated quantitatively or qualitatively. In this study, we evaluated the duration of the procedure and the size of the incision of minimally invasive fixation of distal radius fractures as a means of grading expertise and surgical performance. The null hypothesis of our study was that the level of expertise did not match the level of performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 52 surgeons split in five levels of expertise who had performed 467 minimally invasive fixations of distal radius fractures. The performance of the surgeons in terms of duration of the procedure and size of the incision were scored according to the five levels of surgical experience using four different methodologies: clinical (setting limits compared to data found in literature), statistical (setting statistical limits of comparison in percentiles (20th, 40th, 60th, 80th) for each of the two parameters measured), arithmetical (setting limits compared to equal intervals for each of the 2 variables), and success rate (setting a threshold for each of the 2 variables). RESULTS: Our results showed a great disparity between levels of experience depending on the method used. The scores for levels 1 and 2 were 72% for expertise, 13% for performance according to the clinical method, 75% for the statistical method, 0% for the arithmetical method, and 57% according the success rate. The rate of level 3 was 23% for expertise, 41% for performance by the clinical method, 17% by the statistical method, 17% by the arithmetical method, and 15% by the success rate. The rates of levels 4 and 5 were 5% for expertise, 46% for performance clinical method, 8% by the statistical method, 83% by the arithmetical method, and 28% by the success rate. DISCUSSION: The null hypothesis of our study was confirmed by the results which show that there was no correlation between levels of expertise and performance. The clinical method of assessment appears to reflect best the true level of performance of the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Publications reporting the results of a surgical technique for a given pathology should always mention the level of performance as measured on a clinical scale.

Pullout strength of connected pins in hand surgery: Effect of pin diameter and insertion angle.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of insertion angles on the pullout strength of connected pins using a synthetic model simulating a hand bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The material consisted of Sawbones® (20 mm×20 mm × 60 mm), fixation pins secured to a connecting rod much like an external fixator, an electric drill (speed 1,290 rpm) and a tensile testing machine. The Sawbones® were drilled with different pin diameters (1.2 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.8 mm) and insertion angles (100°, 110° and 120°). A vertical displacement of 1 mm/min was applied until the pins were extracted (maximum force). RESULTS: The pullout strength increased with the insertion angle of the connected pins. It also increased with their diameter. Regardless of the pin diameter, the load-displacement curve during the pullout test had 4 sections (peak 1, ascending slope, peak 2, descending slope) that corresponded to the combined frictional force and contact force between the pins and Sawbones®. DISCUSSION: Our study findings showed that, theoretically, for wrist or hand fractures treated with connected pins, the larger the diameter and insertion angle, the better the mechanical holding power of the pins. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, experimental study.

Anterior plating technique for distal radius: comparing performance after learning through naive versus deliberate practice.

BACKGROUND: Surgical teaching is most often carried out in the operating theatre through mentorship, and the performance of surgical procedures is rarely measured. The objective of this article is to compare the progression in learning curves of junior surgeons trained in the anterior plating technique for the distal radius on a nonbiological model according to three different methods. METHODS: The materials comprised 12 junior surgeons of level 1 or 2 (as per Tang and Giddins) divided into three groups: control (G1), naive practice (G2), and deliberate practice (G3). The three groups watched a demonstration video of a level 5 expert. The four G1 surgeons (two level 1 and two level 2) saw the video only once, and each inserted five plates. The four G2 surgeons (two level 1 and two level 2) inserted five plates and watched the video before each time. The four G3 surgeons (two level 1 and two level 2) saw the video before the first plate insertion. Before posing the subsequent four plates, the four G3 surgeons watched their own video, and the expert indicated their errors and how to avoid them next time. A 12-criteria OSATS defined on the basis of the 60 videos, each graded from one (min.) to five (max.), was used to measure the objective surgical performance per plating (min. 12; max. 60) and per series of five plate fixations (min. 60, max. 300). RESULTS: The total average objective performance of G1 was 44.73, of G2 was 50.57 and of G3 was 54.35. Change in objective performance was better for G3 (13.25) than G2 (5) or G1 (3.75). For all groups, the progression in objective performance was better amongst level 1 surgeons (9) than level 2 surgeons (5.6). CONCLUSION: Surgical teaching is based on mentorship and experience. However, since "see one, practice many, do one" has started to replace "see one, do one, teach one", learning techniques have increasingly relied on procedure simulators. Against this background, few studies have looked at measuring the performance of surgical procedures and improved learning curves. Our results appear to suggest that deliberate practice, when used in addition to mentorship, is the best option for shortening the growth phase of the learning curve and improving performance. Deliberate practice is a learning technique for surgical procedures that is complementary to mentorship and experience, which allows the growth phase of the learning curve to be shortened and the objective performance of junior surgeons to be improved.

K-wire pullout strength in hand surgery: Impact of diameter, threading length and drilling speed.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the impact, combined and in interaction, of diameter, threading length and drilling speed on K-wire pullout strength in a synthetic model of a hand bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The material comprised Sawbones® (20 ×20×50mm), K-wires (diameter 1.2mm, 1.5mm, 1.8mm; threading 0mm, 5mm, 10mm, 15mm), a universal chuck with T handle and a drill (speed 0, 320, 500, 830, 1,290rpm), and tensile testing machine and a digital decision aid. The Sawbones® were drilled, varying diameter, threading and speed. The Statistical Design of Experiments (SDOE) methodology enabled the number of trials to be reduced from 300 to 70. Tensile tests at 1mm/s was imposed on the K-wire up to pullout (pullout strength). RESULTS: There was no interaction between threading length and diameter effects or between drilling speed and diameter effects, but a strong interaction between drilling speed and threading length effects. CONCLUSION: Before using K-wires for internal fixation in wrist or hand fracture, the surgeon has to select their characteristics, optimal holding power being theoretically ensured by large diameter wires with long threading inserted by a high-speed drill. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, experimental study.

Relationship between surgeons' position and the duration of the procedure during minimally invasive osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures.

This study aimed to assess the influence of the surgeon's position on procedure time in MIPO (Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis) for distal radius fracture. The hypothesis was that there was a correlation between procedure time and the surgeon's position in relation to the operated side. Thirteen surgeons (12 right-handed, 1 left-handed) operated on 421 distal radius fractures: 208 right-sided (R) and 213 left-sided (L). Surgeons stood either at the patient's head (H) or the feet (F). Procedure time and scar size were measured. Regardless of operated side (right or left), mean surgery time was 35.5 min (range, 14-71) with the surgeon at the head and 40.5 min (range, 11-119) with the surgeon at the feet. The difference (5 min) was statistically significant. When the right side was operated on, surgery time was 34.2 min (range, 14-66) with surgeon at the head and 41.1 min (range, 11-86) at the feet. The difference (6 min) was statistically significant. No other comparisons were significant. There was no correlation with surgeon's experience. Given that 1 min of operating room time costs between €10.80 and €29, savings of €54 to €145 per procedure can be achieved. The study hypothesis was confirmed, with a correlation between the surgeon's position in relation to the operated side and the duration of the operation. In conclusion, we recommend that surgeons position themselves at the patient's head for of distal radius fracture MIPO.