Treatment patterns and glycated haemoglobin levels over 36 months in individuals with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy: The global DISCOVER study.

AIMS: To describe glucose-lowering treatment regimens and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) trajectories in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over 36 months of follow-up from the start of second-line therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This data analysis from the 3-year, observational DISCOVER study programme included 14 687 participants from 37 countries with T2D initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy. Treatment and HbA1c data were collected at baseline (start of second-line therapy) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Treatment regimen changes over follow-up were analysed using the McNemar test, with carry-forward imputation for intermediate missing values. RESULTS: A total of 11 592 participants had treatment data at baseline and 36 months, and 11 882 had HbA1c data at baseline. At baseline and 36 months, respectively, rates of oral monotherapy use were 12.1% and 12.4% (P = 0.22), rates of dual oral therapy use were 63.4% and 47.6% (P < 0.0001), rates of ≥ triple oral therapy use were 17.5% and 25.4% (P < 0.0001), and rates of injectable treatment use were 7.0% and 13.7% (P < 0.0001). Use of injectable drugs was most common among participants with an HbA1c level ≥64 mmol/mol (≥8.0%). Overall, 42.9% of participants changed treatment during follow-up. Mean HbA1c levels at baseline and 6 months were 67 mmol/mol (8.3%) and 55 mmol/mol (7.2%), respectively, remaining stable thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Dual oral therapy was the most common treatment regimen at the start of second-line treatment, and over half of the participants remained on the same treatment during follow-up.

Safety and efficacy of a 1-year treatment with zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Pamidronate (PAM) infusion is the standard treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Zoledronic acid (ZOL) is a bisphosphonate with higher potency and faster intravenous infusion, but its efficacy and safety has not been established for OI patients. We report an open-label, prospective, and randomized clinical analysis to study the safety and efficacy of ZOL compared with PAM in 23 children with OI. They were selected to receive PAM (PAM group), 1 mg/kg/day, over 2 days or ZOL (ZOL group), 0.025-0.05 mg/kg/day, over 2 days every 3-4 months according to their ages, during a 1-year follow-up. They were observed for clinical and biochemical parameters, side effects, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture rate. After treatment, the PAM and ZOL groups average lumbar spine (LS) BMD increased by 51.8% (p = 0.053) and 67.6% (p = 0.003), respectively. Parallel improvement was seen in LS Z-score in the PAM and ZOL groups, with scores of -5.3 to -3.8 (p = 0.032) and -4.8 to -2.3 (p = 0.007), respectively. LS Z-score for the ZOL group at the end of treatment was higher compared with the PAM group but only a borderline significance (p = 0.053). The total alkaline phosphatase (AP) in the ZOL group significantly decreased from baseline at third and fourth infusion (p = 0.032). Mild side effects were similar in both groups, but no severe clinical symptoms were reported. In conclusion, the present study shows that the use of ZOL in the dosage and period studied was safe and efficient to promote a clinical and densitometric improvement, similarly to PAM. Further studies are needed to establish optimal dosing and long-term safety.