Acute Surgical Management of the Burn Patient.

Burn management has developed over time to encompass care that includes more than just survival but also quality of life and successful reintegration into society. Identification of burns that require timely operative intervention supports the goals of excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes in burn survivors. Appropriate patient optimization, detailed preoperative planning, and intraoperative communication are keys to success.

A pilot study examining experiential learning vs didactic education of abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Current surgical education relies on simulated educational experiences or didactic sessions to teach low-frequency clinical events such as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate if simulation would improve performance and knowledge retention of ACS better than a didactic lecture. METHODS: Nineteen general surgery residents were block randomized by postgraduate year level to a didactic or a simulation session. After 3 months, all residents completed a knowledge assessment before participating in an additional simulation. Two independent reviewers assessed resident performance via audio-video recordings. RESULTS: No baseline differences in ACS experience were noted between groups. The observational evaluation demonstrated a significant difference in performance between the didactic and simulation groups: 9.9 vs 12.5, P = .037 (effect size = 1.15). Knowledge retention was equivalent between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that simulation-based education may be more effective for teaching the basic concepts of ACS.

Bupivacaine Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control after Augmentation Mammaplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

BACKGROUND: The long-acting preparation of bupivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine (EXPAREL, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in October 2011 and has been shown to be safe in breast augmentation. It remains to be established if liposomal bupivacaine provides superior pain control in this setting. OBJECTIVES: This study compares liposomal bupivacaine and standard bupivacaine for postoperative pain control. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing cosmetic primary subpectoral breast augmentation were recruited. Each patient was treated with bupivacaine in one implant pocket and liposomal bupivacaine in the other prior to closure in a randomized fashion. Both patient and surgeon were blinded. A brief pain inventory was administered by telephone every 12 h up to 72 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Liposomal bupivacaine demonstrated a statistically significantly lower pain score at the 12, 36, and 48 h time points in the worst pain category, at the 24, 36, 48, and 60 h time points in the least pain category, at the 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h time points in the average pain category, and at the 24, 48, and 72 h time points in the pain rated at the time of the survey. These differences, however, were small, ranging from 0.08 to 0.98 using a 10-point pain scale. When asked if the additional charge for the liposomal bupivacaine would have been worth the benefit, 70% of the patients surveyed said "no." CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a statistically significant decrease in postoperative pain with the use of liposomal bupivacaine, this may not translate to an appreciable clinical benefit that justifies the additional cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Therapeutic.