Social buffering reduces fear expression in Wistar rats when tested in pairs, but not when retested alone.

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which the stress response of an individual can be reduced by the presence of another individual. However, little is known about the effect of social buffering on aversive after memory extinction, especially when animals are tested alone afterwards. The aim of this study was to verify the social buffering effect in rats during the extinction session of the contextual fear conditioning model and the fear response when animals are tested alone in the following day. Animals were divided into subjects and associates, with the subjects undergoing the fear conditioning protocol and the associates paired with the subjects during the fear extinction session. Across five different experiments, we tested moderate and high intensity contextual fear conditioning protocols, as well four variations of pairs: (i) two conditioned subjects, (ii) a conditioned subject and a non-conditioned associate, (iii) a conditioned subject and an associate who observed the conditioning of the partner and (iv) two conditioned subjects, with one treated with diazepam. The social buffering effect was found efficient to reduce the fear memory expression during the fear extinction session. In the moderate intensity protocol, the reduction in freezing time occurred only in subjects accompanied by non-conditioned associates and observer associates. In the high intensity protocol, the social buffering effect occurred in subjects accompanied by either conditioned or non-conditioned associates, although the effect was more evident in the presence of non-conditioned subjects. Treatment of the conditioned associates with diazepam did not improve the social buffering effect. Moreover, social buffering effects were not correlated with self-grooming or prosocial behaviors, which indicates that the presence of another animal might decrease freezing by promotion of exploratory activity. Finally, the social buffering effect was not observed in the extinction test, either because the extinction was too effective in the moderate intensity protocol or because the extinction was equally ineffective in the high intensity protocol. Our results suggest that social buffering does not improve fear extinction consolidation.

Contribution of mesolimbic dopamine and kappa opioid systems to the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Decreased dopaminergic activity and increased kappa opioid activity in the mesolimbic system underlie the negative emotional states related to chronic pain. However, it is not known whether these changes are just consequence of chronic pain or contribute to the sensorial changes associated with chronic pain. In this study, we asked whether the mesolimbic dopamine and kappa opioid systems contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic hyperalgesia, one of the most common sensorial changes related to chronic pain. The lesion of the dopaminergic cells of the ventral tegmental area prevented the transition from acute to chronic hyperalgesia when performed in pain-free rats, but did not affect the maintenance of chronic hyperalgesia, when performed in chronic pain in rats. As hyperalgesia becomes chronic, the dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens decrease. The blockade of the kappa opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens both prevented and reversed the development of chronic hyperalgesia, but did not affect its maintenance. Complementarily, the pharmacological activation of the kappa opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens facilitated the transition from acute to chronic hyperalgesia. None of these interventions affected acute hyperalgesia. These findings suggest that the mesolimbic dopamine and kappa opioid systems specifically drive the pain chronification process, without affecting acute pain or the maintenance of chronic pain.

Nucleus accumbens mediates the pronociceptive effect of sleep deprivation: the role of adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors.

Sleep disorders increase pain sensitivity and the risk of developing painful conditions; however, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. It has been suggested that nucleus accumbens (NAc) influences sleep-wake cycle by means of a balance between adenosine activity at A2A receptors and dopamine activity at D2 receptors. Because the NAc also plays an important role in pain modulation, we hypothesized that the NAc and its A2A and D2 receptors mediate the pronociceptive effect of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep deprivation (SD). We found that 24 hours of REM-SD induced an intense pronociceptive effect in Wistar rats, which decreases progressively over a sleep rebound period. Although the level of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites increased with SD within group, it did not differ between sleep-deprived group and control group, indicating a stress response with similar magnitude between groups. The pronociceptive effect of REM-SD was prevented by excitotoxic lesion (N-Methyl-D-aspartate, 5.5 µg) of NAc and reverted by its acute blockade (Qx-314, 2%). The administration of an A2A receptor antagonist (SCH-58261, 7 ng) or a D2 receptor agonist (piribedil, 6 µg) into the NAc increased home cage activity and blocked the pronociceptive effect of REM-SD. Complementarily, an A2A receptor agonist (CGS-21680, 24 ng) impaired the reversal of the pronociceptive effect and decreased home cage activity, as it did a D2 receptor antagonist (raclopride, 5 µg). Rapid eye movement SD did not affect the expression of c-Fos protein in NAc. These data suggest that SD increases pain by increasing NAc adenosinergic A2A activity and by decreasing NAc dopaminergic D2 activity.

TRPA1, substance P, histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine interact in an interdependent way to induce nociception.

BACKGROUND: Although TRPA1, SP, histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) have recognized contribution to nociceptive mechanisms, little is known about how they interact with each other to mediate inflammatory pain in vivo. In this study we evaluated whether TRPA1, SP, histamine and 5-HT interact, in an interdependent way, to induce nociception in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: The subcutaneous injection of the TRPA1 agonist allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) into the rat's hind paw induced a dose-dependent and short lasting behavioral nociceptive response that was blocked by the co-administration of the TRPA1 antagonist, HC030031, or by the pretreatment with antisense ODN against TRPA1. AITC-induced nociception was significantly decreased by the co-administration of selective antagonists for the NK1 receptor for substance P, the H1 receptor for histamine and the 5-HT1A or 3 receptors for 5-HT. Histamine- or 5-HT-induced nociception was decreased by the pretreatment with antisense ODN against TRPA1. These findings suggest that AITC-induced nociception depends on substance P, histamine and 5-HT, while histamine- or 5-HT-induced nociception depends on TRPA1. Most important, AITC interact in a synergistic way with histamine, 5-HT or substance P, since their combination at non-nociceptive doses induced a nociceptive response much higher than that expected by the sum of the effect of each one alone. This synergistic effect is dependent on the H1, 5-HT1A or 3 receptors. CONCLUSION: Together, these findings suggest a self-sustainable cycle around TRPA1, no matter where the cycle is initiated each step is achieved and even subeffective activation of more than one step results in a synergistic activation of the overall cycle.