Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods.

This topical review focuses on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT requires stricter accuracy than standard radiation therapy due to the high dose per fraction and the limited number of fractions. The review considered various PSQA methods reported in 36 articles between 01/2010 and 07/2022 for SBRT treatment. In particular comparison among devices and devices designed for SBRT, sensitivity and resolution, verification methodology, gamma analysis were specifically considered. The review identified a list of essential data needed to reproduce the results in other clinics, highlighted the partial miss of data reported in scientific papers, and formulated recommendations for successful implementation of a PSQA protocol.

Helical tomotherapy and two types of volumetric modulated arc therapy: dosimetric and clinical comparison for several cancer sites.

Radiotherapy accelerators have undergone continuous technological developments. We investigated the differences between Radixact™ and VMAT treatment plans. Sixty patients were included in this study. Dosimetric comparison between the Radixact™ and VMAT plans was performed for six cancer sites: whole-brain, head and neck, lymphoma, lung, prostate, and rectum. The VMAT plans were generated with two Elekta linear accelerators (Synergy® and Versa HD™). The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organs-at-risk dose constraints, and four dosimetric indexes were considered. The deliverability of the plans was assessed using quality assurance (gamma index evaluation) measurements; clinical judgment was included in the assessment. The mean AAPM TG218 (3%-2 mm, global normalization) gamma index values were 99.4%, 97.8%, and 96.6% for Radixact™, Versa HD™, and Synergy®, respectively. Radixact™ performed better than Versa HD™ in terms of dosimetric indexes, hippocampi D100%, spinal cord Dmax, rectum V38.4  Gy, bladder V30 Gy, and V40 Gy. Versa HD™ saved more of the (lungs-PTV) V5 Gy and (lungs-PTV) Dmean, heart Dmean, breasts V4 Gy, and bowel V45 Gy. Regarding Synergy®, the head and neck Radixact™ plan saved more of the parotid gland, oral cavity, and supraglottic larynx. From a clinical point of view, for the head and neck, prostate, and rectal sites, the Radixact™ and Versa HD™ plans were similar; Radixact™ plans were preferable for the head and neck and rectum to Synergy® plans. The quality of linac plans has improved, and differences with tomotherapy have decreased. However, tomotherapy continues to be an essential add-on in multi-machine departments.

Adoption of Expansion Margins to Reduce the Dose Received by the Coronary Arteries and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Lymphoma Patients.

PURPOSE: Mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lymphoma implies involuntary coronary artery (CA) exposure, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate delineation of CAs may spare them from higher RT doses. However, heart motion affects the estimation of the dose received by CAs. An expansion margin (planning organ at risk volume [PRV]), encompassing the nearby area where CAs displace, may compensate for these uncertainties, reducing CA dose and CAD risk. Our study aimed to evaluate if a planning process optimized on CA-specific PRVs, rather than just on CAs, could provide any dosimetric or clinical benefit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients receiving RT for mediastinal lymphomas were included. We contoured left main trunk, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. An isotropic PRV was then applied to all CAs, in accordance with literature data. A comparison was then performed by optimizing treatment plans either on CAs or on PRVs, to detect any difference in CA sparing in terms of maximum (Dmax), median (Dmed), and mean (Dmean) dose. We then investigated, through risk modeling, if any dosimetric benefit obtained with the PRV-related optimization process could translate to a lower risk of ischemic complications. RESULTS: Plan optimization on PRVs demonstrated a significant dose reduction (range, 7%-9%) in Dmax, Dmed, and Dmean for the whole coronary tree, and even higher dose reductions when vessels were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV (range, 13%-15%), especially for left main trunk and left circumflex (range, 16%-21%). This translated to a mean risk reduction of developing CAD of 12% (P < .01), which increased to 17% when CAs were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of CA-related PRVs in the optimization process reduces the dose received by CAs and translates to a meaningful prevention of CAD risk in patients with lymphoma treated with mediastinal RT.

Automatic genetic planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy: A large multi-centre validation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The first clinical genetic autoplanning algorithm (Genetic Planning Solution, GPS) was validated in ten radiotherapy centres for prostate cancer VMAT by comparison with manual planning (Manual). METHODS: Although there were large differences among centres in planning protocol, GPS was tuned with the data of a single centre and then applied everywhere without any centre-specific fine-tuning. For each centre, ten Manual plans were compared with autoGPS plans, considering dosimetric plan parameters and the Clinical Blind Score (CBS) resulting from blind clinician plan comparisons. AutoGPS plans were used as is, i.e. there was no patient-specific fine-tuning. RESULTS: For nine centres, all ten plans were clinically acceptable. In the remaining centre, only one plan was acceptable. For the 91% acceptable plans, differences between Manual and AutoGPS in target coverage were negligible. OAR doses were significantly lower in AutoGPS plans (p < 0.05); rectum D15% and Dmean were reduced by 8.1% and 17.9%, bladder D25% and Dmean by 5.9% and 10.3%. According to clinicians, 69% of the acceptable AutoGPS plans were superior to the corresponding Manual plan. In case of preferred Manual plans (31%), perceived advantages compared to autoGPS were minor. QA measurements demonstrated that autoGPS plans were deliverable. A quick configuration adjustment in the centre with unacceptable plans rendered 100% of plans acceptable. CONCLUSION: A novel, clinically applied genetic autoplanning algorithm was validated in 10 centres for in total 100 prostate cancer patients. High quality plans could be generated at different centres without centre-specific algorithm tuning.