Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Healthy Elderly Participants.

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, safety, and tolerability of the antiseizure medication brivaracetam (BRV) were characterized in 16 healthy elderly participants (8 men/8 women) aged 65-78 years who received a single 200-mg oral dose of BRV on day 1, followed by 200 mg twice daily from day 3 until day 12. BRV and three metabolites were determined in plasma and urine. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, general and neurological examinations, and psychometric rating scales were recorded at regular intervals. No clinically relevant changes or abnormalities were detected. The adverse events were similar to those observed in pivotal trials. Rating scales indicated transiently increased sedation and decreased alertness. BRV pharmacokinetics and metabolism were unchanged relative to younger populations. Based on our observations in this healthy elderly population receiving oral BRV 200 mg twice daily (twice the maximum recommended dose), dose reductions are not warranted relative to other, younger populations. Further investigations may be necessary in frail elderly populations aged >80 years.

Mechanistic incorporation of FcRn binding in plasma and endosomes in a whole body PBPK model for large molecules.

Monoclonal antibodies, endogenous IgG, and serum albumin bind to FcRn in the endosome for salvaging and recycling after pinocytotic uptake, which prolongs their half-life. This mechanism has been broadly recognized and is incorporated in currently available PBPK models. Newer types of large molecules have been designed and developed, which also bind to FcRn in the plasma space for various mechanistic reasons. To incorporate FcRn binding affinity in PBPK models, binding in the plasma space and subsequent internalisation into the endosome needs to be explicitly represented. This study investigates the large molecules model in PK-Sim® and its applicability to molecules with FcRn binding affinity in plasma. With this purpose, simulations of biologicals with and without plasma binding to FcRn were performed with the large molecule model in PK-Sim®. Subsequently, this model was extended to ensure a more mechanistic description of the internalisation of FcRn and the FcRn-drug complexes. Finally, the newly developed model was used in simulations to explore the sensitivity for FcRn binding in the plasma space, and it was fitted to an in vivo dataset of wild-type IgG and FcRn inhibitor plasma concentrations in Tg32 mice. The extended model demonstrated a strongly increased sensitivity of the terminal half-life towards the plasma FcRn binding affinity and could successfully fit the in vivo dataset in Tg32 mice with meaningful parameter estimates.

Caplacizumab Model-Based Dosing Recommendations in Pediatric Patients With Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) is a rare and life-threatening autoimmune thrombotic microangiopathy. Caplacizumab, evaluated in phase II and III studies in adults, shortens the time to platelet count response and reduces aTTP exacerbations, has a favorable safety profile, and can potentially reduce refractoriness and mortality associated with aTTP. Since no children with aTTP were enrolled in these clinical trials, caplacizumab has been initially approved for use only in adult patients with aTTP (10 mg). Pediatric dosing recommendations were developed using model-based simulations. A semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic population model has been developed describing the interaction between caplacizumab and von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) following intravenous and subcutaneous administration of caplacizumab in different adult populations, at various dose levels, using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Based on the allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, different dosing regimens were simulated in 8000 children (aged 2-18 years). Simulated caplacizumab exposures and vWF:Ag levels across different age categories were compared to an adult reference group. A simulated daily dose of 5 mg in children weighing <40 kg and of 10 mg in children weighing ≥40 kg resulted in similar exposures and vWF:Ag suppression across age and weight groups. Despite the lack of pediatric clinical data, the results of this modeling and simulation analysis constituted the basis for the European extension of indication for caplacizumab (10 mg) to adolescents aged >12 years and with a body weight ≥40 kg. This represents a rare case in which regulatory authorities have deemed a modeling and simulation study robust enough to approve a variation of indication.

Clinical pharmacology of caplacizumab for the treatment of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Introduction: Caplacizumab is a humanized anti-von Willebrand Factor (vWF) Nanobody® for the treatment of acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (aTTP). Caplacizumab targets the A1-domain of vWF, inhibiting the interaction between vWF and platelets. Clinical studies conducted in aTTP patients confirmed the rapid and sustained complete suppression of the vWF activity using an initial intravenous dose of 10 mg, and a maintenance subcutaneous 10 mg daily dosing regimen, with corresponding favorable efficacy and safety profiles. Areas covered: The pharmacokinetics of caplacizumab are non-linear, characterized by a target-mediated disposition and the exposure is dependent upon drug and target concentration over time. The pharmacokinetics of caplacizumab are predictable when considering the turn-over of the circulating vWF and its modulation by the drug over time. Renal and hepatic impairment are not expected to influence the exposure to the drug, and no direct or indirect drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions are anticipated based on the mechanism of action and the specificity of the pharmacodynamic effect of caplacizumab. Expert opinion: Caplacizumab prevents the interaction between vWF and platelets, offering a direct and rapid therapeutic intervention to stop microthrombosis. The combination of caplacizumab with plasma exchange and immunosuppression represents an important, potentially life-saving advance in the treatment of aTTP patients.

Brivaracetam disposition in mild to severe hepatic impairment.

Brivaracetam is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand in clinical development for epilepsy. This open-label, single-dose study evaluated brivaracetam disposition in participants with different degrees of hepatic impairment versus matched healthy controls. Twenty-six participants (38-72 years; 19 males and 7 females) with hepatic impairment classified by Child-Pugh score (mild, n = 6; moderate, n = 7; severe, n = 7) or normal hepatic function (n = 6) received a single oral dose of 100 mg brivaracetam. The pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam and its three main metabolites (acid, hydroxy, hydroxyacid) were determined and correlated with impairment severity. Dynamic liver function tests correlated with hepatic impairment severity. The plasma half-life of brivaracetam was 9.8, 14.2, 16.4, and 17.4 hours and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 29.7, 44.6, 46.7, and 47.1 µg h/mL in healthy controls and participants with mild, moderate, and severe liver impairment, respectively. Production of the acid metabolite was increased and the hydroxylated metabolites were decreased in participants with hepatic impairment versus healthy controls. Exposure to brivaracetam increased by 50-60% in patients with hepatic impairment, irrespective of severity. The relative importance of biotransformation pathways was altered; cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent hydroxylation decreased; CYP-independent acid metabolite formation increased concomitantly.

Brivaracetam disposition in renal impairment.

Brivaracetam is a novel high-affinity SV2A ligand currently in clinical development for epilepsy. The objective was to characterize its disposition in patients with renal impairment. A single oral dose of 200 mg brivaracetam was administered to 9 patients with severe renal impairment not requiring dialysis (creatinine clearance <15 mL/min, n = 6; 15-29 mL/min, n = 3) and 9 matched healthy controls. Plasma and urinary concentrations of brivaracetam and 3 pharmacologically inactive metabolites (acid, hydroxy, and hydroxyacid) were determined up to 72 hours postdose, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. The C(max) of brivaracetam was unchanged relative to healthy controls, whereas AUC was slightly increased (mean ratio, 1.21; 90% confidence interval, 1.01-1.45). Nonrenal and renal clearances of brivaracetam decreased from 47 and 4.5 to 41 and 1.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Exposure to the acid, hydroxy, and hydroxyacid metabolites was markedly increased: C(max) by 2.4-, 2.0-, and 11.7-fold and AUC by 3.2-, 4.1-, and 21.5-fold. Renal clearance of these rapidly cleared metabolites was decreased 10-fold in patients with severe renal impairment. Nonclinical toxicology studies concluded to the absence of safety issues related to the increased levels of metabolites. These observations suggest that dose adjustment of brivaracetam should not be required at any stage of renal dysfunction.

Assessment of levetiracetam bioavailability from targeted sites in the human intestine using remotely activated capsules and gamma scintigraphy: Open-label, single-dose, randomized, four-way crossover study in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug that binds to synaptic vesicle protein SV2A. Levetiracetam is indicated in the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures, myoclonic seizures, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. It is also approved in Europe as monotherapy for newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures. A Phase I clinical pharmacology trial was conducted during preregistration clinical development to better understand the regional gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of levetiracetam. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of levetiracetam in various regions of the GI tract using a noninvasive, remote-controlled capsule device providing targeted drug delivery, relative to that after oral administration, and explored the drug's absorption characteristics in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from healthy men aged 18 to 65 years in an open-label, single-dose, randomized, 4-way crossover study. Treatments included levetiracetam 250 mg administered as an immediate-release tablet and capsule delivery of 250 mg drug substance (levetiracetam powder without excipients) to the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and ascending colon. The location of the capsule in the GI tract was monitored using γ-scintigraphic imaging. Blood samples for plasma levetiracetam concentration were collected before dosing; at 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes; and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after tablet intake or after capsule activation. Pharmacokinetic parameters C(max), T(max), AUC0₋(last), AUC0₋(∞) and t(½) were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Tolerability was determined using clinical assessment, monitoring of vital signs, laboratory analysis, and interviews with the volunteers regarding adverse events. RESULTS: Nine healthy men, 7 whites and 2 Asians, were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 31 [14] years; weight, 77 [5] kg; height, 176 [6] cm). Six volunteers completed all 4 treatments. Seven adverse events (headache [3], lethargy [2], tachycardia [1], and contusion [1]) were reported in 5 volunteers, but only 2 (headache and lethargy) were judged by the investigator to be possibly drug related. The geometric mean (%CV) AUC(0-last) values of levetiracetam delivered in the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, ascending colon, and stomach (oral tablet) were 58.2 (9.3%), 59.6 (8.9%), 51.5 (12.0%), and 59.0 (7.4%) µg · h/mL, respectively. Values for bioavailability in the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and ascending colon relative to the tablet were 98.5% (95% CI, 89.7%-108.2%), 100.8% (95% CI, 91.4%-111.1%), and 87.1% (95% CI, 77.9%-97.5%). CONCLUSION: After delivery in the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, or ascending colon, the systemic bioavailability of levetiracetam (AUC), but not C(max) and T(max), appeared comparable to that after oral administration and thus appeared site independent in this small group of healthy fasting men.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK).

Allometric scaling is widely used to predict human pharmacokinetic parameters from preclinical species, and many different approaches have been proposed over the years to improve its predictive performance. Nevertheless, prediction errors are commonly observed in the practical application of simple allometry, for example, in cases where the hepatic metabolic clearance is mainly determined by enzyme activities, which do not scale allometrically across species. Therefore, if good correlation was noted for some drugs, poor correlation was observed for others, highlighting the need for other conceptual approaches. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are now a well-established approach to conduct extrapolations across species and to generate simulations of pharmacokinetic profiles under various physiological conditions. While conventional pharmacokinetic models are defined by drug-related data themselves, PBPK models have richer information content and integrate information from various sources, including drug-dependent, physiological, and biological parameters as they vary in between species, subjects, or with age and disease state. Therefore, the biological and mechanistic bases of PBPK models allow the extrapolation of the kinetic behavior of drugs with regard to dose, route, and species. In addition, by providing a link between tissue concentrations and toxicological or pharmacological effects, PBPK modeling represents a framework for mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

From pharmacokinetics to therapeutics.

Whilst pharmacokinetics describe the relationship between dose levels and concentration-time profiles of a drug in the body and pharmacodynamics describe the concentration-response relationships, pharmacokinectics-pharmacodynamics(PK-PD) models link these two items providing a framework for modelling the time course of drug response. In this chapter, PK-PD models, describing the therapeutic effects of drugs used for the therapy of allergic diseases have been reviewed. Emphasis was given also to the description of the receptor occupancy, which is tightly related to the downstream clinical response. PK - PD models describing unwanted effects were also commented. An integrated use of these models allows choosing appropriate dosing regimens and providing an objective evaluation of the benefit/risk balance.

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis in allergic diseases.

In this chapter, we introduce the concepts and methodologies of population analysis as applied to analyzing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. One of the key determining characteristics of the population approach is that through it, one seeks not only to characterize deterministic trends in the data, but also to identify and estimate the magnitudes of the important sources of variability within the data. The first section of this chapter provides an introduction to the primary concepts of, and motivation for, population modeling by way of a hypothetical case study. Then, the various methodologies that have been employed throughout the history of population analysis are described in further detail. Of these, the most commonly employed today is nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling. Finally, notable examples of the application of population PK and PK/PD modeling to treatments for allergies and asthma are discussed. Population PK models have frequently been used to extrapolate exposures to special populations, such as pediatrics, as well as to optimize treatment regimens and trial designs for these populations. Population PK/PD models have most frequently been applied to analyzing and interpreting data from wheal and flare trials, but are also becoming increasingly important in the analysis of PD data from monoclonal antibodies.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam XR 500mg tablets.

PURPOSE: To compare the relative bioavailability of levetiracetam extended-release tablets (XR) with immediate release tablets (IR) following single and multiple dosing; to assess the food effect and the dose-proportionality of XR from 1000 to 3000mg. METHODS: Two panels of 24 healthy subjects were enrolled. Study N01160 was a three-way crossover between IR fasted (single and repeated 500mg b.i.d.), XR fasted (single and repeated 1000mg o.d.) and XR with food (1000mg single dose). Study N01260 was a three-way crossover single dose-proportionality between XR 1000, 2000 and 3000mg. RESULTS: After single dose, levetiracetam XR and IR were bioequivalent with respect to AUC((0-t)), AUC(infinity) and C(max). The median t(max) was delayed from 0.9 to 4h. For the fed/fasted comparison, the confidence intervals around the C(max) and AUC ratios were within the 80-125% limits. At steady-state, the AUC(24h) were also bioequivalent. In the dose-proportionality trial, the AUC and C(max) increased linearly with the dose. Levetiracetam XR was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam XR 1000mg o.d. is bioequivalent to levetiracetam IR 500mg b.i.d. There is no food effect, and the absorption of XR is dose-proportional from 1000 to 3000mg.

Retrospective population pharmacokinetic analysis of levetiracetam in children and adolescents with epilepsy: dosing recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize levetiracetam pharmacokinetics, identify significant covariate relationships and identify doses in children that achieve blood concentrations similar to those observed in adults. METHODS: Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse pooled data collected from 228 children with epilepsy aged 3 months to 18 years in five trials of adjunctive levetiracetam therapy. Simulations were used to identify dosing regimens achieving levetiracetam steady-state peak and trough plasma concentrations similar to those attained in adults receiving the recommended starting dose for adjunctive therapy (500 mg twice daily). The covariates considered for inclusion in the base model were age, bodyweight, gender, race, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), levetiracetam dose, concomitant antiepileptic drug (AED) by category (neutral, enzyme inducer, inhibitor, combination of inducer and inhibitor), and benzodiazepines. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best characterized the data. The following significant covariates were identified: (i) age on the absorption rate constant (k(a)); (ii) bodyweight, dose, CL(CR) and concomitant enzyme-inducing AED on plasma oral clearance (CL/F); and (iii) bodyweight on the apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (V(d)/F). The main explanatory covariates were age on k(a), bodyweight on CL/F and V(d)/F, and enzyme-inducing AED on CL/F, of which bodyweight was the most influential covariate. Dosing can be carried out with either 10 mg/kg of oral solution twice daily in children weighing <50 kg and a 500-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing >50 kg or, when patients favour a solid formulation, 10 mg/kg of oral solution twice daily in children weighing <20 kg, a 250-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing 20-40 kg, and a 500-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing >40 kg. All of these doses achieved steady-state peak and trough plasma concentrations similar to those observed in adults following the recommended starting dose for adjunctive therapy (500 mg twice daily). CONCLUSIONS: The most influential covariate of levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in children is bodyweight. A starting dose of levetiracetam 10 mg/kg twice daily ensures the same exposure in children as does 500 mg twice daily in adults.

The pharmacokinetics, CNS pharmacodynamics and adverse event profile of brivaracetam after multiple increasing oral doses in healthy men.

AIMS: Brivaracetam is a novel synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand that has shown potent activity in animal models of epilepsy. This study examined the pharmacokinetics, central nervous system pharmacodynamics and adverse event profile of multiple oral doses of brivaracetam in healthy male subjects. METHODS: Three successive panels of 12 healthy male subjects received double-blind brivaracetam 200, 400 or 800 mg day(-1) (all doses well above the expected therapeutic range) or placebo (9 : 3), in two divided doses, for 14 days. RESULTS: Brivaracetam was rapidly absorbed (t(max) approximately 2 h) and eliminated (t(1/2) 7-8 h). Volume of distribution was slightly lower than total body water. A small fraction of the dose (5-8%) was excreted unchanged in urine together with significant levels of metabolites, suggesting predominantly metabolic clearance. Based on 6-beta-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratios in urine, there was no evidence of induction of CYP3A4 activity. Saliva and plasma brivaracetam levels were highly correlated. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, central nervous system-related and resolved within the first day of treatment. No clinically relevant changes were observed in laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations or ECGs. Pharmacodynamic tests showed dose-related sedation and decreased alertness that only persisted at 800 mg daily. CONCLUSIONS: Brivaracetam was well tolerated by healthy male volunteers at doses of 200-800 mg daily for 2 weeks, well above the expected clinically effective dose range. Brivaracetam had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in this population, characterized by rapid absorption, volume of distribution limited to total body water, apparent single-compartment elimination and dose proportionality.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 14C-brivaracetam, a novel SV2A ligand, in healthy subjects.

This study was designed to investigate the human absorption, disposition, and mass balance of (14)C-brivaracetam, a novel high affinity SV2A ligand with potent anticonvulsant activity. Six healthy male subjects received a single p.o. dose of (14)C-brivaracetam (150 mg, 82 microCi, or 3.03 MBq). Serial blood and complete urine and feces were collected until 144 h postdose. Expired air samples were obtained until 24 h. Brivaracetam was rapidly absorbed, with C(max) of 4 mug/ml occurring within 1.5 h of dosing. Unchanged brivaracetam amounted to 90% of the total plasma radioactivity, suggesting a modest first-pass effect. Plasma protein binding of radioactivity was low (17.5%). Urinary excretion exceeded 90% after 2 days, and the final mass balance reached 96.8% of the radioactivity in urine and 0.7% in feces. Only 8.6% of the radioactive dose was recovered in urine as unchanged brivaracetam, the remainder being identified as non-cytochrome P450 (P450)- and P450-dependent biotransformation products resulting from hydrolysis of the amide moiety (M9, 34.2%), hydroxylation of the n-propyl side chain (M1b, 15.9%), and a combination of these two pathways leading to the hydroxy acid (M4b, 15.2%). Minor amounts of taurine and glucuronic acid conjugates and other oxidized derivatives were also identified. Brivaracetam is completely absorbed, is weakly bound to plasma proteins, extensively biotransformed through several metabolic pathways, and eliminated renally.

Modeling and simulation of intravenous levetiracetam pharmacokinetic profiles in children to evaluate dose adaptation rules.

PURPOSE: To develop a pharmacokinetic model for intravenous levetiracetam in children, based on adult intravenous data and pediatric oral data. METHODS: Data from two adult Phase-I studies in which levetiracetam was given intravenously were utilized to develop the adult population pharmacokinetic two-compartment intravenous model. After model qualification, combination with an existing pediatric one-compartment oral population pharmacokinetic model enabled simulation of twice-daily intravenous infusions of levetiracetam in children. Median and 90% confidence intervals for C(trough), C(max) (end of infusion) and AUC(tau) were simulated for 2000 children and compared to the values observed in adults. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic two-compartment model successfully described intravenous levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in healthy adults. After combination with the oral pediatric population model, steady-state concentrations at the end of 15-, 30- and 60 min b.i.d. levetiracetam intravenous infusions in children were predicted to be 29-41, 17-24 and 6-13% higher than those observed after oral dosing of 30 mg/kg b.i.d. Concentrations returned to the range of oral exposures within 1h after the infusion peak. The combined model predicted that steady-state peak plasma concentrations and AUC(tau) in children receiving 30 mg/kg twice daily as 15 min intravenous infusions were within the range of predicted and observed C(max,ss) and AUC(tau )values of adults receiving 15 min intravenous infusions of 1500 mg levetiracetam. CONCLUSIONS: The simulations suggest that levetiracetam may be administered intravenously in children as 15 min infusions.

Population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in Japanese and Western adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam, a second-generation antiepileptic drug, in adult Japanese and Western populations. METHODS: Data were pooled from ten matched clinical trials conducted in Japan and in Europe and the USA, in which levetiracetam was administered orally to healthy subjects and subjects with epilepsy. Overall, 5408 plasma concentrations were available from 524 subjects in six clinical pharmacology studies and two confirmatory and two long-term safety studies of add-on treatment for partial epilepsy. A one-compartment open model with first-order absorption and elimination was fitted to the plasma concentrations using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling with first-order estimation. RESULTS: Ethnicity had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in the presence of the other covariates. Bodyweight, sex, creatinine clearance and concomitant intake of enzyme inducers or valproic acid had a statistically significant effect on apparent plasma clearance of levetiracetam. Bodyweight, disease and valproic acid had a statistically significant effect on the volume of distribution. Levetiracetam exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 12-hour dosing interval at steady state) was 12% higher in females than in males. Decreasing bodyweight from 70 kg to 40 kg was predicted to increase exposure by 16%, while halving creatinine clearance was predicted to increase exposure by 10%. Enzyme inducers reduced exposure by 8%, while valproic acid resulted in a 23% increase in exposure. The latter effect was assumed to arise from the known association between valproic acid and increased body fat, since levetiracetam is negligibly metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis points to the absence of ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam between Japanese and Western populations, other than those arising from bodyweight differences. Small, clinically non-relevant differences between individual demographic characteristics suggest that dose adjustment is usually not necessary.

The pharmacokinetics, CNS pharmacodynamics and adverse event profile of brivaracetam after single increasing oral doses in healthy males.

AIMS: The objective of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (and how they are affected by food), CNS pharmacodynamics and the adverse event profile of brivaracetam after single increasing doses. METHODS: Healthy males (n = 27, divided into three alternating panels of nine subjects) received two different single oral doses of brivaracetam (10-1400 mg) and one dose of placebo during three periods of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The effect of food on its pharmacokinetics was assessed using a standard two-way crossover design in a further eight subjects who received two single oral doses of brivaracetam (150 mg) in the fasting state and after a high fat meal. RESULTS: Adverse events, none of which were serious, were mostly CNS-related and included somnolence, dizziness, and decreased attention, alertness, and motor control. Their incidence, severity and duration were dose-related. The maximum tolerated dose was established to be 1000 mg. Severe somnolence lasting 1 day occurred in one subject following 1400 mg. Brivaracetam was rapidly absorbed under fasting conditions, with a median t(max) of approximately 1 h. C(max) was dose-proportional from 10 to 1400 mg, whereas AUC deviated from dose linearity above 600 mg. A high-fat meal had no effect on AUC (point estimate 0.99, 90%CI: 0.92-1.07) but delayed t(max) (3 h) and decreased C(max) (point estimate 0.72, 90%CI: 0.66-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Brivaracetam was well tolerated after increasing single doses that represent up to several times the expected therapeutic dose. Brivaracetam was found to have desirable pharmacokinetic properties. The most common adverse events were somnolence and dizziness.