Upgrades from Previous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Compared to De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantations: Results from CRT Survey-II in the Turkish Population.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the guideline-directed treatment option in selected heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction patients. Data regarding the contemporary clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey have been published recently. This sub-study aims to compare clinical and periprocedural characteristics between cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade and de novo implantations. METHODS: Turkish arm of the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II was conducted between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, at 16 centers. All consecutive patients who underwent an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy system (n=60) or de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (n=335) were eligible. RESULTS: Distribution of age, gender, and heart failure etiology were similar in the 2 groups. Atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, and chronic kidney disease were more common in cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade patients. Narrow intrinsic QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction being 75% in both groups, and only beta-blockers were prescribed at rates of >90% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades are performed with high procedural success rates and without excess periprocedural complication risk. Feared complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades due to the pre-existing device should not delay the procedure if indicated.

Current clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey: Reflections from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality in selected patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). CRT Survey-II was a snapshot survey to assess current clinical practice with regard to CRT. Herein, we aimed to compare Turkish data with other countries of European Society of Cardiology (ESC). METHODS: The survey was conducted between October 2015 and December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. All consecutive patients who underwent a de novo CRT implantation or a CRT upgrade were eligible. RESULTS: A total of 288 centers included 11,088 patients. From Turkey, 16 centers recruited 424 patients representing 12.9% of all implantations. Compared to the entire cohort, Turkish patients were younger with a lower proportion of men and a higher proportion with ischemic etiology. Electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus rhythm in 81.5%, a QRS duration of <130 ms in 10.1%, and ≥150 ms in 63.8% of patients. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was more common. Median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 25%, lower than in the overall ESC cohort, but NYHA class was more often II. Most common indication for CRT implantation was HF with a wide QRS (70.8%). Almost 98.3% of devices implanted were CRT-D, in contrast to the overall cohort. Fluoroscopy time was longer, but duration of overall procedure was shorter. LV lead implantation was unsuccessful in 2.6% patients. Periprocedural complication rate was 6.3%. The most common complication was bleeding. Remote monitoring was less utilized. CONCLUSION: These are the first observational data reflecting the current CRT practice in Turkey and comparing it with other countries of Europe. Findings of this study may help detect gaps and provide insights for improvement.

Adherence to ESC cardiac resynchronization therapy guidelines: findings from the ESC CRT Survey II.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and electrical dyssynchrony. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations indicating optimal patient selection for CRT implantation in both the 2013 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the 2016 Heart Failure Association (HFA) Guidelines. We assessed the adherence to guidelines and identified factors associated with guideline adherence. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 2016, the HFA and EHRA conducted the CRT Survey II in 42 ESC countries. The data collected were sufficient to evaluate adherence to guidelines in 8021 patients. Of these, 67% had a Class I guideline indication for CRT implantation, which was significantly correlated with female gender (1.70, P < 0.0001), age <75 years (1.55, P < 0.0001), non-ischaemic HF aetiology (1.22, P < 0.0001), and elective admission (1.87, P < 0.0001). A further 26% of implants had a Class IIa indication, 5% IIb and only 2% a contraindication to CRT-a Class III indication. Patients implanted under Level IIa indications were much more likely to have more comorbidities than patients implanted under Level I indications. However, there were large variations in guideline adherence between ESC countries. CONCLUSION: Implanters in ESC member states demonstrate a high degree of adherence to ESC guidelines with 98% of implants having a documented Class I, IIa or IIb indication. Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation without a Class I indication was more likely in men, patients age ≥75 years, with HF of ischaemic origin and in patients admitted to hospital acutely.

Safety of radial coronary angiography with uninterrupted direct-acting oral anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVE: It is not known whether direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban increase the risk of bleeding complications during or after coronary catheterization. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of uninterrupted DOAC treatment during diagnostic radial coronary angiography (CAG). METHODS: This study included 160 patients who underwent diagnostic radial cardiac catheterization. The 60 patients in the group who were using a DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran) were enrolled in a Group A. Post-procedure results from patients in Group A were compared with those of an age- and sex-matched control group (Group B) that included 100 patients who underwent radial CAG who did not use a DOAC. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the procedure and compression times, creatinine level, or presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol use, vascular disease, or congestive heart failure between the 2 groups. During the 1 -month follow-up period, only 1 radial occlusion was registered in the control group (Group B). There was no case of a large hematoma (>5 cm or extending to the forearm), dissection, fistula, perforation, or compartment syndrome. Hematomas smaller than 5 cm were seen in 2 patients (1 in each group). No thrombotic events were observed during follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION: Performing radial CAG with uninterrupted DOAC treatment appears to carry no risk of increased early or short-term complications. The simple, uninterrupted DOAC strategy is comfortable, easy, and safe.

CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure and is strongly recommended for such patients by guidelines. A European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CRT survey conducted in 2008-2009 showed considerable variation in guideline adherence and large individual, national and regional differences in patient selection, implantation practice and follow-up. Accordingly, two ESC associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, designed a second prospective survey to describe contemporary clinical practice regarding CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey of the clinical practice of CRT-P and CRT-D implantation was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. Implanting centres provided information about their hospital and CRT service and were asked to complete a web-based case report form collecting information on patient characteristics, investigations, implantation procedures and complications during the index hospitalisation. The 11 088 patients enrolled represented 11% of the total number of expected implantations in participating countries during the survey period; 32% of patients were aged ≥75 years, 28% of procedures were upgrades from a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 30% were CRT-P rather than CRT-D. Most patients (88%) had a QRS duration ≥130 ms, 73% had left bundle branch block and 26% were in atrial fibrillation at the time of implantation. Large geographical variations in clinical practice were observed. CONCLUSION: CRT Survey II provides a valuable source of information on contemporary clinical practice with respect to CRT implantation in a large sample of ESC member states. The survey permits assessment of guideline adherence and demonstrates variations in patient selection, management, implantation procedure and follow-up strategy.