Preliminary Clinical Experience with a High-Definition Three Dimensional Exoscope for Spinal Surgery.

We retrospectively evaluated spinal surgeries performed using the high-definition three-dimensional exoscopic system, which became available at our institution in August 2020. Eleven patients (4 with cervical disease and 7 with lumbar disease) underwent surgery with the system. There were no surgical complications related to the system, and the results were satisfactory. The small, flexible camera of the exoscope allows the surgeon to view the surgical field from various angles, facilitating both the approach and technique. In addition, it allows the surgeon to operate in an upright position without strain on the head and neck. Although further surgical experience is needed, this system has the potential to improve the visualization of the surgical field in spinal surgery.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Spinal Surgery and Interventions: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection following spinal surgery causes prolonged delay in recovery after surgery, increases cost, and sometimes leads to additional surgical procedures. We investigated risk factors for the occurrence of surgical site infection events in terms of patient-related, surgery-related, and postoperative factors. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1000 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our hospital between April 2016 and March 2019. RESULTS: Patient-related factors were dementia, length of preoperative hospital stay (≥ 14 days), and diagnosis at the time of surgery (traumatic injury or deformity). The one surgery-related factor was multilevel surgery (≥ 9 intervertebral levels), and the one postoperative factor was time to ambulation (≥ 7 days) were statistically significant risk factors for spinal surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: One risk factor identified in this study that is amenable to intervention is time to ambulation. As delayed ambulation is a risk factor for postoperative surgical site infection, how medical staff can intervene in postoperative ambulation to further reduce the incidence of surgical site infection is a topic for future research.

Intradural extramedullary tumor location in the axial view affects the alert timing of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) reportedly helps prevent postoperative neurological complications following high-risk spinal cord surgeries. There are negative and positive reports about using IONM for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors. We investigated factors affecting alerts of IONM in IDEM tumor surgery. METHODS: We analyzed 39 patients with IDEM tumors who underwent surgery using IONM at our hospital between January 2014 and March 2021. Neurological symptoms were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the manual muscle test (MMT). All patients were evaluated to ascertain the tumor level and location in the axial view, the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and histological type. Additionally, the intraoperative procedure associated with significant IONM changes in transcranial electrical stimulation muscle-evoked potential was investigated. RESULTS: There were 11 false-positive and 16 true-negative cases. There was one true-positive case and one false-negative case; the monitoring accuracy achieved a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 59%, a positive predictive value of 8%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. In the 22 alert cases, if the tumor was located anterolateral in the axial view, alerts were triggered with a significant difference (p = 0.02) during tumor resection. Alerts were generated for fifteen patients during tumor resection; nine (60%) showed waveform improvement by intervention and were classified as rescue cases. CONCLUSION: Alert is probably triggered during tumor resection for anterolaterally located tumors. Alerts during tumor resection procedures were more likely to be rescued than other procedures in IDEM tumor surgery.