The relative analgesic value of a femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple comparative studies report that adductor canal blocks provide similar pain relief to femoral nerve blocks following total knee arthroplasty. However, adductor canal blockade fails to anesthetize several important femoral nerve branches that contribute to knee innervation. We sought to clarify this anatomic discrepancy by performing both blocks in sequence, using patients as their own controls. We hypothesized that patients would experience additional pain relief following a superimposed femoral nerve block, demonstrating that these techniques are not equivalent. METHODS: Sixteen patients received continuous adductor canal block before undergoing knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia. In the recovery room, patients reported their pain score on a numeric scale of 0-10. Once a patient reached a score of five or greater, he/she was randomized to receive an additional femoral nerve block using 2% chloroprocaine or saline sham, and pain scores recorded every 5 min for 30 min. Patients received opioid rescue as needed. Anesthesiologists performing and assessing block efficacy were blinded to group allocation. RESULTS: Patients randomized to chloroprocaine versus saline reported significantly improved median pain scores 30 min after the femoral block (2.0 vs. 5.5, P = 0.0001). Patients receiving chloroprocaine also required significantly fewer morphine equivalents during the 30 min post-femoral block (1.0 vs. 4.5 mg, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Adductor canal block is a useful technique for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty, but it does not provide equivalent analgesic efficacy to femoral nerve block. Future studies comparing efficacy between various block sites along the thigh are warranted.

Development and Implementation of a Perioperative Blood Glucose Monitoring Protocol for Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery.

PURPOSE: Stress-induced hyperglycemia during the perioperative period is associated with adverse outcomes after spinal surgery, which increases both patient-related burden and hospital costs. This quality improvement project describes the development and implementation of a perioperative blood glucose monitoring protocol for patients undergoing spinal surgery. DESIGN: An evidence-based perioperative blood glucose monitoring protocol was developed by a multidisciplinary committee of specialists in endocrinology and anesthesiology with utilization of the American Diabetes Association diabetes screening criteria. METHODS: The protocol was implemented in the perioperative areas of a regional hospital in the Southeastern United States. The project sample included patients with and without a prior diagnosis of diabetes who met protocol inclusion criteria during a 3-month implementation period. FINDINGS: Preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing identified more than 54% of previously undiagnosed patients with levels consistent with either prediabetes or diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association criteria for diagnosis. Patients with diabetes and those without diabetes experienced a perioperative increase in blood glucose with levels remaining elevated above preoperative baseline through postoperative day 1. CONCLUSIONS: A perioperative blood glucose monitoring protocol enables preoperative identification of patients with undiagnosed prediabetes and diabetes, allowing for optimization before elective surgery and establishment of appropriate postoperative follow-up care. In addition, a blood glucose monitoring protocol increases the detection of perioperative hyperglycemia and may lead to a reduction in postoperative complications after spinal surgery.