The advantages of incorporating liquid-based cytology (TACAS™) in mass screening for cervical cancer.

We incorporated liquid-based cytology (LBC) in population-based screening for cervical cancer. The usefulness of using LBC in mass screening for cervical cancer was examined. From 2009 to 2014, 157,061 individuals underwent mass screening for cervical cancer in Aomori Prefecture. From 2009 to 2011, cells were collected from 82,218 individuals and the specimens were conventionally prepared (CP). From 2012 to 2014, cells were collected from 74,843 individuals and the specimens were prepared using LBC (TACAS™). Cytology results for the 2 sets of specimens were compared and differences in cytologic features were examined. ASC-US and more severe lesions were detected at a rate of 1.13 % by CP and 1.44 % by LBC, so LBC had a 1.3-fold higher rate of detection. LBC had a 1.6-fold higher rate of LSIL detection and a 1.2-fold higher rate of HSIL detection. CP detected cancer in 20 cases at a rate of 0.024 % while LBC detected cancer in 18 cases at a rate of 0.024 %. Cytodiagnosis of the 18 cases of SCC that LBC identified revealed that 7 were SCC, 8 were HSIL, and 3 were ASC-H. Atypical cells tended to be smaller with TACAS™. LBC reduced the time needed for microscopic examination of a single specimen by 42 % in comparison to CP. LBC using TACAS™ allowed the detection of slight lesions and slight changes in cells. LBC can lessen the burden on medical personnel and may lead to improved accuracy.

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D and its receptor, VEGF receptor 3, as a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D and VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3 in endometrial carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the levels of immunoreactivity for VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in 71 endometrial carcinomas, 14 complex atypical endometrial hyperplasias, and 16 normal endometria by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: VEGF-D was stained in both tumor cells and adjacent stromal cells. VEGFR-3 was stained in both tumor cells and adjacent endothelial cells. Immunoreactivity for VEGF-D in tumor cells and adjacent stromal cells became significantly stronger as lesions progressed from normal endometrium to advanced carcinoma. Similarly, immunoreactivity for VEGFR-3 in tumor cells and adjacent endothelial cells was significantly greater as lesions progressed from normal endometrium to advanced carcinoma. A strong correlation was found between high levels of VEGF-D immunoreactivity in carcinoma cells and VEGFR-3 in both carcinoma cells and adjacent endothelial cells. Similarly, high levels of VEGF-D immunoreactivity in stromal cells were significantly correlated with those of VEGFR-3 in both carcinoma cells and endothelial cells. High levels of VEGF-D in carcinoma cells and stromal cells, as well as those of VEGFR-3 in carcinoma cells and endothelial cells, were significantly related to myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis. A strong correlation was found between poor survival and high levels of VEGF-D in both carcinoma cells and stromal cells and between poor survival and high levels of VEGFR-3 in carcinoma cells. Moreover, the high levels of VEGF-D in stromal cells and VEGFR-3 in carcinoma cells were independent prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in endometrial carcinoma may predict myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis and may prospectively identify patients who are at increased risk for poor outcome. In addition, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 may be promising targets for new therapeutic strategies in endometrial carcinoma.