RESUMO
1.BackgroundTo promote the vaccination against COVID-19, person-to-person communication from vaccinated people will play an important role. The objectives of this study are to identify what messages were shared by vaccinated people, and the relationship between these messages and their background. MethodsThis study was an exploratory and prospective basis with individual interviews. The participants were healthcare providers and healthy adults who were recruited at a vaccination site in Chuo-City, Tokyo. The online interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview. Based on the Health Belief Model (HBM), the participants were asked about their perspectives on vaccines and what they talked about after their vaccination. The interviews were categorized into each item of the HBM and analyzed using NVivo software. ResultsDuring August to October 2021, five healthcare providers and seven healthy adults were enrolled in the study. One healthy adult could not be contacted resulting in a total of 11 participants interviewed. Both the healthcare providers and the healthy adults mainly talked about side effects after their vaccination, and to ease the other persons concerns based on their experience. Meanwhile, there were differences in the recommendations for vaccination between the two groups. The healthcare providers were strongly aware of the severity of COVID-19 infection and recommended vaccination to others as a useful measure to suppress becoming severely ill. On the other hand, the healthy adults recommended the vaccine with varying degree depending on their expectations and concerns about the vaccine and external factors such as living with a family member. ConclusionBoth the healthcare providers and healthy adults shared similar messages to ease the vaccination concerns of others. However, their vaccine recommendation level was varied, which may be influenced not only by expectations and concerns toward the vaccine, but also by external factors such as family members living together.
RESUMO
This study is designed to clarify the effects of increases in a rehabilitation session on the functional outcome of hip fractures in the subacute phase. Of 95 patients with hip fractures admitted to our subacute care ward between November 2010 and March 2012, five patients transferred to another ward due to complications were excluded, and 90 patients were taken up. The 90 patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients who underwent rehabilitation before an increase in the frequency of rehabilitation sessions (early-phase group) and 68 who underwent rehabilitation after an increase in the frequency (later-phase group). Outcomes, such as the number of rehabilitation sessions, length of hospital stay, FIM at the time of discharge, FIM efficiency and destination after hospital discharge, were compared between the two groups. In a comparison of all patients, the number of rehabilitation sessions significantly increased (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in FIM at the time of discharge from hospital, FIM efficiency and post-discharge destination. Group “Rank A” stood out in a comparison of the degree of independence enjoyed by the disabled elderly in their daily life before they suffered injuries (p<0.05). Group “Rank I” stood out in a comparison of the degree of independence in the daily life by the elderly with dementia, while they were in hospital (p0.05). The FIM efficiency of the later-phase group was significantly higher than that of the early-phase group. It is presumably effective to begin intensive rehabilitation for patients whose ADL ability is somewhat reduced and those who have cognitive impairments. It has been thought that cognitive impairment was one of the factors that inhibit rehabilitation for hip fractures. However, it has been suggested that improvements in ADL are possible with increases in rehabilitation sessions for cases with mild cognitive impairment.
