[Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy in multiple centers for identical human subjects].

The fractional anisotropy (FA) is calculated by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with multiple motion probing gradients (MPG). While FA has become a widely used tool to detect moderate changes in water diffusion in brain tissue, the measured value is sensitive to scan parameters (e.g. MPG-direction, signal to noise ratio, etc.). Therefore, it is paramount to address the reproducibility of DTI measurements among multiple centers. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-center variability of FA. We studied five healthy volunteers who underwent DTI brain scanning three times at three different centers (I-III), each with a 1.5 T scanner having a different MPG-schema. Then, we compared the FA and eigenvalue from the three centers measured in seven brain regions: splenium of corpus callosum (CCs), genu of corpus callosum (CCg), putamen, posterior limb of internal capsule, cerebral peduncle, optic radiation, and middle cerebellar peduncle. At the CCs and CCg, there was a statistical difference (p<0.05) between center Iand center IIfor the same MPG-directions. Furthermore, at CCs and CCg, there was a statistical difference (p<0.05) between center II and center III for different MPG-directions. Conversely, no statistical differences were found between center I and center III for the different MPG-directions for all regions. These results indicate that the FA value was affected by the MPG-schema as well as by the MPG-directions.

[Usefulness of lower extremity 2D TOF MR venography with respiratory compensation technique, and effect of patient positioning on the visualization of deep veins in the leg].

We evaluated the usefulness of two-dimensional time-of-flight (2D TOF) MR venography (MRV) of the lower extremity using the respiratory compensation (RC) technique. In addition, six variations in patient positioning of the leg and knee were investigated to determine the best method of visualizing the deep popliteal veins and lower leg. All data sets were reviewed and graded for visualization of the deep veins at the pelvis, thigh, and leg portion (4-point scale) by two radiologists and three radiological technologists. The same veins demonstrated with various positions of the patient were also evaluated in the same manner. In conclusion, 2D TOF MRV with RC resulted in increased uniformity of vein signal in the pelvic area. Furthermore, we should position the patient's leg so as not to compress the vein at the posterior portion of the leg, and not to over-extend the knee joint. This enabled the best results to be obtained in MRV of the lower extremity.