RESUMO
The only hope of cure in carcinoma stomach is gastrectomy; it can be total or partial depending upon the location of the tumor. While there is no controversy in the extent of resection, the choice of anastomosis after partial gastrectomy is a matter of debate. For pyloric lesions, we felt that in spite of the ease of performing surgery, simplicity, being physiological, and time-saving, Billroth I is underutilized. Hence, the study rationale was to compare Billroth I and Billroth II anastomosis post-gastric resection in the surgical management of gastric cancer. This was a retrospective study performed in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre (AHRCC), Cuttack, Odisha. A total of 95 patients who underwent distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer during 2016 and 2017 were included in the study. Nineteen patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction and 76 patients underwent Billroth II reconstruction. In the case of both groups, no statistically significant differences (pË0.05) were found in terms of early post-operative complications or long-term post-operative follow-up in our experience. Billroth I reconstruction is a simple, oncologically safe, economical, and physiological procedure. It can be performed when there is availability of large stomach remnant post-gastric resection. However, there is no significant difference between Billroth I and Billroth II in terms of patient's recovery and post-operative complications.
