Improving digital partner notification for sexually transmitted infections and HIV through a systematic review and application of the Behaviour Change Wheel approach.

BACKGROUND: Partner notification (PN) is key to controlling sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Digital PN options (e.g. social media, short message service (SMS), emails) are promising in increasing PN behaviour. However, their implementation is often challenging and studies report varied levels of acceptability and uptake of PN, highlighting the need to optimise digital PN interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to digital PN interventions for STIs, including HIV, across eight research databases (from 2010 to 2023) identified eight relevant studies, two of which addressed HIV. Data extraction identified 98 barriers and 54 facilitators to the use of digital PN interventions. These were synthesised into 18 key barriers and 17 key facilitators that were each deemed amenable to change. We then used the Behaviour Change Wheel approach, the Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects and Equity criteria, and multidisciplinary expert input, to systematically develop practical recommendations to optimise digital PN. RESULTS: Thirty-two specific recommendations clustered around three themes. Digital PN interventions should: (1) empower and support the index patient by providing a range of notification options, accompanied by clear instructions; (2) integrate into users' existing habits and the digital landscape, meeting contemporary standards and expectations of usability; and (3) address the social context of PN both online and offline through normalising the act of PN, combating STI-related stigma and stressing the altruistic aspects of PN through consistent messaging to service users and the public. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence-based recommendations should be used to optimise existing digital PN interventions and inform the co-production of new ones.

Increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission among patients discharged against medical advice: a nationwide analysis.

PURPOSE: Annually, 1%-2% of hospitalized patients are discharged against medical advice (AMA), positioning them at an increased risk of readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Our study aim was to examine 30-day all-cause readmission rates and estimate readmission odds among AMA discharges in the United States, across clinically distinct diagnostic subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, serial cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2010-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Descriptive statistics and 30-day all-cause readmission rates for hospitalizations among adults aged 18 years or older were estimated by major diagnostic subgroup, discharge disposition, and patient and hospital characteristics. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multipredictor logistic regression. RESULTS: We found the AMA discharge to be an independent predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days, with a 25.6% readmission rate and an overall adjusted likelihood of readmission that was almost double to quadruple that of routine discharges. Furthermore, although hospitalizations experienced decreased odds of readmission after the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program implementation (October 1, 2012), our results demonstrate that the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program did not modify the impact of an AMA discharge on readmission. CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for practice, policies, and interventions aimed at improving care quality, preventing AMA discharge, and reducing hospital readmissions in inpatient settings.

Gender Dysphoria and Suicidal Ideation: Clinical Observations from a Psychiatric Emergency Service.

Adolescent gender dysphoria is increasingly common. There has been documentation of the association of gender dysphoria with numerous other psychiatric conditions as well as attempted and completed suicide. The literature is unsettled on specific risk factors for self-harm within this population. Though there are published recommendations, there appears to be a need for additional clinical evidence for the determination of the safest and most effective treatment strategies for adolescent gender dysphoria.  This clinical observation describes the unique case of an adolescent with gender dysphoria, severe body dysmorphia, and suicidal ideation who presented for emergency psychiatric evaluation. Gender-affirming hormone therapy had been administered to this patient at the age of 13, well earlier than published guidelines, though it was discontinued after a short course due to persistent gender uncertainty and distress. This case provides an opportunity to consider the complexity of adolescent gender dysphoria, including the unique individual features that affect the risk for self-harm and how treatment history may be related. With an increasing prevalence of gender dysphoria in this population, it is essential that every provider who cares for adolescents be well informed and prepared to recognize and respond to these risks.