LRRK2 G2019S variant is associated with transcriptional changes in Parkinson's disease human myeloid cells under proinflammatory environment.

The G2019S mutation in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene is a major risk factor for the development of Parkinson's disease (PD). LRRK2, although ubiquitously expressed, is highly abundant in cells of the innate immune system. Given the importance of central and peripheral immune cells in the development of PD, we sought to investigate the consequences of the G2019S mutation on microglial and monocyte transcriptome and function. We have generated large-scale transcriptomic profiles of isogenic human induced microglial cells (iMGLs) and patient derived monocytes carrying the G2019S mutation under baseline culture conditions and following exposure to the proinflammatory factors IFNγ and LPS. We demonstrate that the G2019S mutation exerts a profound impact on the transcriptomic profile of these myeloid cells, and describe corresponding functional differences in iMGLs. The G2019S mutation led to an upregulation in lipid metabolism and phagolysosomal pathway genes in untreated and LPS/IFNγ stimulated iMGLs, which was accompanied by an increased phagocytic capacity of myelin debris. We also identified dysregulation of cell cycle genes, with a downregulation of the E2F4 regulon. Transcriptomic characterization of human-derived monocytes carrying the G2019S mutation confirmed alteration in lipid metabolism associated genes. Altogether, these findings reveal the influence of G2019S on the dysregulation of the myeloid cell transcriptome under proinflammatory conditions.

Sex Differences in Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have indicated that female individuals outnumber male individuals for certain types of dystonia. Few studies have addressed factors impacting these sex differences or their potential biological mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors underlying sex differences in the dystonias and explore potential mechanisms for these differences. METHODS: Data from individuals with various types of dystonia were analyzed in relation to sex. Data came from two different sources. One source was the Dystonia Coalition database, which contains predominantly idiopathic adult-onset focal and segmental dystonias. The second source was the MDSGene database, which contains predominantly early-onset monogenic dystonias. RESULTS: The 3222 individuals from the Dystonia Coalition included 71% female participants and 29% male participants for an overall female-to-male ratio (F:M) of 2.4. This ratio varied according to body region affected and whether dystonia was task-specific. The female predominance was age-dependent. Sex did not have a significant impact on co-existing tremor, geste antagoniste, depression or anxiety. In the 1377 individuals from the MDSGene database, female participants outnumbered male participants for some genes (GNAL, GCH1, and ANO3) but not for other genes (THAP1, TH, and TOR1A). CONCLUSIONS: These results are in keeping with prior studies that have indicated female individuals outnumber male individuals for both adult-onset idiopathic and early onset monogenic dystonias. These results extend prior observations by revealing that sex ratios depend on the type of dystonia, age, and underlying genetics.

An Empirical Comparison of Commonly Used Universal Rating Scales for Dystonia.

Background: There are several widely used clinical rating scales for documenting the severity and distribution of various types of dystonia. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the most commonly used scales in a large group of adults with the most common types of isolated dystonia. Methods: Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) scores were obtained for 3067 participants. Most had focal or segmental dystonia, with smaller numbers of multifocal or generalized dystonia. These scales were also compared for 209 adults with cervical dystonia that had Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores and 210 adults with blepharospasm that had Blepharospasm Severity Scale (BSRS) scores. Results: There were strong correlations between the GDRS and BFM total scores (r = 0.79) and moderate correlations for their sub scores (r > 0.5). Scores for both scales showed positive skew, with an overabundance of low scores. BFM sub-scores were not normally distributed, due to artifacts caused by the provoking factor. Relevant sub-scores of the GDRS and BFM also showed moderate correlations with the TWSTRS (r > 0.5) for cervical dystonia and the BSRS (r > 0.5) for blepharospasm. Conclusions: The BFM is more widely used than the GDRS, but these results suggest the GDRS may be preferable for focal and segmental dystonias. The overabundance of very low scores for both scales highlights challenges associated with discriminating very mild dystonia from other abnormal movements or variants of normal behavior.

Genetic risk variants in New Yorkers of Puerto Rican and Dominican Republic heritage with Parkinson's disease.

There is a paucity of genetic characterization in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) of Latino and Afro-Caribbean descent. Screening LRRK2 and GBA variants in 32 New Yorkers of Puerto Rican ethnicity with PD and in 119 non-Hispanic-non-Jewish European PD cases revealed that Puerto Rican participants were more likely to harbor the LRRK2-p.G2019S variant (15.6% vs. 4.2%, respectively). Additionally, whole exome sequencing of twelve Puerto Rican and Dominican PD participants was performed as an exploratory study.

International Genetic Testing and Counseling Practices for Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: There is growing clinical and research utilization of genetic testing in Parkinson's disease (PD), including direct-to-consumer testing. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to determine the international landscape of genetic testing in PD to inform future worldwide recommendations. METHODS: A web-based survey assessing current practices, concerns, and barriers to genetic testing and counseling was administered to the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society membership. RESULTS: Common hurdles across sites included cost and access to genetic testing, and counseling, as well as education on genetic counseling. Region-dependent differences in access to and availability of testing and counseling were most notable in Africa. High-income countries also demonstrated heterogeneity, with European nations more likely to have genetic testing covered through insurance than Pan-American and Asian countries. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights not only diversity of barriers in different regions but also the shared and highly actionable needs for improved education and access to genetic counseling and testing for PD worldwide. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease.

Genetic testing for persons with Parkinson's disease is becoming increasingly common. Significant gains have been made regarding genetic testing methods, and testing is becoming more readily available in clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer settings. Although the potential utility of clinical testing is expanding, there are currently no proven gene-targeted therapies, but clinical trials are underway. Furthermore, genetic testing practices vary widely, as do knowledge and attitudes of relevant stakeholders. The specter of testing mandates financial, ethical, and physician engagement, and there is a need for guidelines to help navigate the myriad of challenges. However, to develop guidelines, gaps and controversies need to be clearly identified and analyzed. To this end, we first reviewed recent literature and subsequently identified gaps and controversies, some of which were partially addressed in the literature, but many of which are not well delineated or researched. Key gaps and controversies include: (1) Is genetic testing appropriate in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals without medical actionability? (2) How, if at all, should testing vary based on ethnicity? (3) What are the long-term outcomes of consumer- and research-based genetic testing in presymptomatic PD? (4) What resources are needed for clinical genetic testing, and how is this impacted by models of care and cost-benefit considerations? Addressing these issues will help facilitate the development of consensus and guidelines regarding the approach and access to genetic testing and counseling. This is also needed to guide a multidisciplinary approach that accounts for cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic factors in developing testing guidelines. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Differences in Sex-Specific Frequency of Glucocerebrosidase Variant Carriers and Familial Parkinsonism.

BACKGROUND: Although men and women with the LRRK2 G2019S variant appear to be equally likely to have Parkinson's disease (PD), the sex-distribution among glucocerebrosidase (GBA) variant carriers with PD, including limited to specific variant severities of GBA, is not well understood. Further, the sex-specific genetic contribution to PD without a known genetic variant is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To better understand sex differences in genetic contribution to PD, especially sex-specific frequencies among GBA variant carriers with PD (GBA PD) and LRRK2-G2019S variant carriers with PD (LRRK2 PD). METHODS: We assess differences in the sex-specific frequency in GBA PD, including in subsets of GBA variant severity, LRRK2 PD, and idiopathic PD in an Ashkenazi Jewish cohort with PD. Further, we expand prior work evaluating differences in family history of parkinsonism. RESULTS: Both idiopathic PD (267/420 men, 63.6%) (P < 0.001) and GBA PD overall (64/107, 59.8%) (P = 0.042) were more likely to be men, whereas no difference was seen in LRRK2 PD (50/99, 50.5%) and LRRK2/GBA PD (5/10, 50%). However, among GBA PD probands, severe variant carriers were more likely to be women (15/19 women, 79.0%) (P = 0.005), whereas mild variant carriers (44/70 men, 62.9%) (P = 0.039) and risk-variant carriers (15/17 men, 88.2%) (P = 0.001) were more likely to be men. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the male-sex predominance present in GBA PD overall was not consistent across GBA variant severities, and a female-sex predominance was present among severe GBA variant carriers. Therefore, research and trial designs for PD should consider sex-specific differences, including across GBA variant severities. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Who to Enroll in Parkinson Disease Prevention Trials? The Case for Genetically At-Risk Cohorts.

Therapies that prevent the occurrence of Parkinson disease (PD) (primary prevention) or mitigate the progression of symptoms in those with early disease (secondary prevention) are a critical unmet need in disease management. Despite great promise, PD prevention trials have not yet demonstrated success. Initiation of treatment too late in the disease course and the heterogeneity of disease are obstacles that may have contributed to the failure. Genetically stratified groups offer many advantages to primary and secondary prevention trials. In addition to their ease of identification, they decrease disease heterogeneity on several levels. Particularly, they comprise a phenotypically and pathologically enriched group with defined clinical features, pathogenic mechanisms and associated proteins that may serve as specific trial endpoints, therapeutic targets and biomarkers for disease state, and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic status. However, challenges arise from genetic variant heterogeneity, from reduced penetrance whereby many carriers will not develop PD, and in recruiting a population that will meet the desired outcome in the proposed study duration. In this review, we discussed the opportunities afforded by the enrollment of genetically stratified cohorts (i.e., leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 and glucocerebrosidase 1) into prevention trials with a primary focus on primary prevention trials. We also outlined challenges surrounding the enrollment of these cohorts and offered suggestions to leverage their many advantages.

Association of Olfactory Performance With Motor Decline and Age at Onset in People With Parkinson Disease and the LRRK2 G2019S Variant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is clinical and phenotypic heterogeneity in LRRK2 G2019S Parkinson disease (PD), including loss of smell. Olfactory scores have defined subgroups of LRRK2 PD at baseline. We now extend this work longitudinally to better determine features associated with olfactory classes and to gain further insight into this heterogeneity. METHODS: Evaluation of 162 patients with LRRK2 PD and 198 patients with idiopathic PD (IPD) from the LRRK2 Ashkenazi Jewish Consortium was performed, with follow-up available for 92 patients with LRRK2 PD and 74 patients with IPD. Olfaction (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]), motor function (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale), and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), as well as sleep, nonmotor, and mood, were measured. Gaussian mixture models were applied on the UPSIT percentile score to determine subgroups based on olfactory performance. Linear mixed effects models, using PD duration as the time scale, assessed the relationship between UPSIT subgroup membership and motor/cognitive change. RESULTS: Baseline olfaction was better in LRRK2 PD compared with IPD (mean UPSIT ± SD: 24.2 ± 8.8 vs 18.9 ± 7.6), with higher mean percentile scores (difference: 15.3 ± 11.6) (p < 0.001) and less frequent hyposmia (55.6% vs 85.4%; p < 0.001). Analysis suggested 3 classes among LRRK2 PD. Age at onset in LRRK2 PD was earlier in the worst olfaction group (group 1), compared with groups 2 and 3 (54.5 ± 11.1 vs 61.7 ± 9.3) (p = 0.012), and separately in the hyposmic group overall (55.0 ± 11.3 vs 61.7 ± 9.1) (p < 0.001). Longitudinal motor deterioration in LRRK2 PD was also significantly faster in the worst UPSIT group than the best UPSIT group (group 3 vs group 1: B = 0.31, SE = 0.35 vs B = 0.96, SE = 0.28) (rate difference = -0.65, SE = 0.29) (p = 0.03). However, olfactory group membership was not significantly associated with cognitive decline. DISCUSSION: In this large LRRK2 cohort with longitudinal analysis, we extend prior work demonstrating subgroups defined by olfaction in LRRK2 G2019S PD and show that the worst olfaction group has earlier age at PD onset and more rapid motor decline. This supports a subgroup of LRRK2 PD that might show more rapid change in a clinical trial of LRRK2-related agents and highlights the need to integrate careful phenotyping into allocation schema in clinical trials of LRRK2-related agents. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that worse olfactory scores were associated with an earlier age at symptomatic onset and a faster rate of motor deterioration in patients with LRRK2 PD.

Parkinson Disease and Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: Cognitive Effects in GBA Mutation Carriers.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the rate of change in cognition between glucocerebrosidase (GBA) mutation carriers and noncarriers with and without subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson disease. METHODS: Clinical and genetic data from 12 datasets were examined. Global cognition was assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Subjects were examined for mutations in GBA and categorized as GBA carriers with or without DBS (GBA+DBS+, GBA+DBS-), and noncarriers with or without DBS (GBA-DBS+, GBA-DBS-). GBA mutation carriers were subcategorized according to mutation severity (risk variant, mild, severe). Linear mixed modeling was used to compare rate of change in MDRS scores over time among the groups according to GBA and DBS status and then according to GBA severity and DBS status. RESULTS: Data were available for 366 subjects (58 GBA+DBS+, 82 GBA+DBS-, 98 GBA-DBS+, and 128 GBA-DBS- subjects), who were longitudinally followed (range = 36-60 months after surgery). Using the MDRS, GBA+DBS+ subjects declined on average 2.02 points/yr more than GBA-DBS- subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.35 to -1.69), 1.71 points/yr more than GBA+DBS- subjects (95% CI = -2.14 to -1.28), and 1.49 points/yr more than GBA-DBS+ subjects (95% CI = -1.80 to -1.18). INTERPRETATION: Although not randomized, this composite analysis suggests that the combined effects of GBA mutations and STN-DBS negatively impact cognition. We advise that DBS candidates be screened for GBA mutations as part of the presurgical decision-making process. We advise that GBA mutation carriers be counseled regarding potential risks associated with STN-DBS so that alternative options may be considered. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:424-435.

Sex-Related Longitudinal Change of Motor, Non-Motor, and Biological Features in Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Investigation of sex-related motor and non-motor differences and biological markers in Parkinson's disease (PD) may improve precision medicine approach. OBJECTIVE: To examine sex-related longitudinal changes in motor and non-motor features and biologic biomarkers in early PD. METHODS: We compared 5-year longitudinal changes in de novo, untreated PD men and women (at baseline N = 423; 65.5%male) of the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), assessing motor and non-motor manifestations of disease; and biologic measures in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and dopamine transporter deficit on DaTscanTM uptake. RESULTS: Men experienced greater longitudinal decline in self-reported motor (p < 0.001) and non-motor (p = 0.009) aspects of experiences of daily living, such that men had a yearly increase in MDS-UPDRS part II by a multiplicative factor of 1.27 compared to women at 0.7, while men had a yearly increase in MDS-UPDRS part I by a multiplicative factor of 0.98, compared to women at 0.67. Compared to women, men had more longitudinal progression in clinician-assessed motor features in the ON medication state (p = 0.010) and required higher dopaminergic medication dosages over time (p = 0.014). Time to reach specific disease milestones and longitudinal changes in CSF biomarkers and DaTscanTM uptake were not different by sex. CONCLUSION: Men showed higher self-assessed motor and non-motor burden of disease, with possible contributions from suboptimal dopaminergic therapeutic response in men. However, motor features of disease evaluated with clinician-based scales in the OFF medication state, as well as biological biomarkers do not show specific sex-related progression patterns.

BATL: Bayesian annotations for targeted lipidomics.

MOTIVATION: Bioinformatic tools capable of annotating, rapidly and reproducibly, large, targeted lipidomic datasets are limited. Specifically, few programs enable high-throughput peak assessment of liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry data acquired in either selected or multiple reaction monitoring modes. RESULTS: We present here Bayesian Annotations for Targeted Lipidomics, a Gaussian naïve Bayes classifier for targeted lipidomics that annotates peak identities according to eight features related to retention time, intensity, and peak shape. Lipid identification is achieved by modeling distributions of these eight input features across biological conditions and maximizing the joint posterior probabilities of all peak identities at a given transition. When applied to sphingolipid and glycerophosphocholine selected reaction monitoring datasets, we demonstrate over 95% of all peaks are rapidly and correctly identified. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BATL software is freely accessible online at https://complimet.ca/batl/ and is compatible with Safari, Firefox, Chrome and Edge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The minimal clinically important change in the motor section of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for generalized dystonia: Results from deep brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) describes the smallest change in an outcome that is considered clinically meaningful. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) is the most frequently rating scale assessing the efficacy of deep brain stimulation therapy (DBS) for dystonia. To expand our understanding, we evaluated the MCID thresholds for the BFMDRS motor subscale (MS) using physician-reported outcomes. METHODS: We assessed the MCID thresholds for the BFMDRS using movement disorder specialist ratings of videotapes from patients with genetically determined dystonia (Tor1A and THAP1) who underwent bilateral globus pallidum internum (GPi) DBS. We calculated the effect size of the BFMDRS-MS change and determined the MCID thresholds using the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). RESULTS: Twelve participants with a median age at DBS of 44.5 (range:27-68) had baseline and follow-up BFMDRS-MS with a median post-DBS follow-up of 5.5 years. Based on descriptive analysis, patients with good improvement after DBS according to the CGIC [8/12 (67%)] had a median BFMDRS-MS score reduction of 77% [Interquartile range (IQR):66.2;91.0) with an effect size of 0.39, and those with non-improvement [4/12 (33%)], had a median BFMDRS-MS score reduction of 62% (IQR:36.6;83.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our MCID estimates can be utilized in clinical practice in judging clinical relevance. However, further larger, powered studies are needed to simultaneously determine and compare MCID using patient and physician-reported outcomes in segmental and generalized dystonia in genetic and non-genetic populations.

Clinical profiles and outcomes of deep brain stimulation in G2019S LRRK2 Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical features and response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) in G2019S LRRK2-Parkinson disease (LRRK2-PD) and idiopathic PD (IPD). METHODS: The authors conducted a clinic-based cohort study of PD patients recruited from the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Genetics database of PD studies. The cohort included 87 participants with LRRK2-PD (13 who underwent DBS) and 14 DBS participants with IPD enrolled between 2009 and 2017. The baseline clinical features, including motor ratings and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), were compared among LRRK2-PD patients with and without DBS, between LRRK2-PD with DBS and IPD with DBS, and between LRRK2-PD with subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) DBS. Longitudinal motor scores (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-part III) and medication usage were also assessed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Compared to LRRK2-PD without DBS (n = 74), the LRRK2-PD with DBS cohort (n = 13) had a significantly younger age of onset, longer disease duration, were more likely to have dyskinesia, and were less likely to experience hand tremor at disease onset. LRRK2-PD participants were also more likely to be referred for surgery because of severe dyskinesia (11/13 [85%] vs 6/14 [43%], p = 0.04) and were less likely to be referred for medically refractory tremor (0/13 [0%] vs 6/14 [43%], p = 0.02) than were IPD patients. Among LRRK2-PD patients, both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS targets were effective, although the sample size was small for both groups. There were no revisions or adverse effects reported in the GPi-DBS group, while 2 of the LRRK2-PD participants who underwent STN-DBS required revisions and a third reported depression as a stimulation-related side effect. Medication reduction favored the STN group. CONCLUSIONS: The LRRK2-PD cohort referred for DBS had a slightly different profile, including earlier age of onset and dyskinesia. Both the STN and GPi DBS targets were effective in symptom suppression. Patients with G2019S LRRK2 PD were well-suited for DBS therapy and had favorable motor outcomes regardless of the DBS target. LRRK2-DBS patients had longer disease durations and tended to have more dyskinesia. Dyskinesia commonly served as the trigger for DBS surgical candidacy. Medication-refractory tremor was not a common indication for surgery in the LRRK2 cohort.

The commercial genetic testing landscape for Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: There have been no specific guidelines regarding which genes should be tested in the clinical setting for Parkinson's disease (PD) or parkinsonism. We evaluated the types of clinical genetic testing offered for PD as the first step of our gene curation. METHODS: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genetic Testing Registry (GTR) was queried on 12/7/2020 to identify current commercial PD genetic test offerings by clinical laboratories, internationally. RESULTS: We identified 502 unique clinical genetic tests for PD, from 28 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-approved clinical laboratories. These included 11 diagnostic PD panels. The panels were notable for their differences in size, ranging from 5 to 62 genes. Five genes for variant query were included in all panels (SNCA, PRKN, PINK-1, PARK7 (DJ1), and LRRK2). Notably, the addition of the VPS35 and GBA genes was variable. Panel size differences stemmed from inclusion of genes linked to atypical parkinsonism and dystonia disorders, and genes in which the link to PD causation is controversial. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for expert opinion regarding which genes should be included in a commercial laboratory multi-gene panel for PD.

Seeking progress in disease modification in Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: Disease modification in Parkinson disease (PD) has remained an elusive goal, in spite of large investments over several decades. Following a large meeting of experts, this review article discusses the state of the science, possible reasons for past PD trials' failures to demonstrate disease-modifying benefit, and potential solutions. METHODS: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) convened a meeting including leaders in the field and representatives of key stakeholder groups to discuss drug therapy with the goal of disease modification in PD. RESULTS: Important lessons can be learned from previous attempts, as well as from other fields. The selection process for therapeutic targets and agents differs among various organizations committed to therapeutic development. The areas identified as critical to target in future research include the development of relevant biomarkers, refinements of the targeted patient populations, considerations of novel trial designs, and improving collaborations between all stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: We identify potential barriers to progress in disease modification for Parkinson's and propose a set of research priorities that may improve the likelihood of success.

Using computerized spiral analysis to evaluate deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether spiral analysis can monitor the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease (PD) and provide a window on clinical features that change post-operatively. Clinical evaluation after DBS is subjective and insensitive to small changes. Spiral analysis is a computerized test that quantifies kinematic, dynamic, and spatial aspects of spiral drawing. Validated computational indices are generated and correlate with a range of clinically relevant motor findings. These include measures of overall clinical severity (Severity), bradykinesia and rigidity (Smoothness), amount of tremor (Tremor), irregularity of drawing movements (Variability), and micrographia (Tightness). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of subthalamic nucleus (STN) (n = 66) and ventral intermediate thalamus (Vim) (n = 10) DBS on spiral drawing in PD subjects using spiral analysis. Subjects freely drew ten spirals on plain paper with an inking pen on a graphics tablet. Five spiral indices (Severity, Smoothness, Tremor, Variability, Tightness) were calculated and compared pre- and post-operatively using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests, adjusting for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Severity improved after STN and Vim DBS (p < 0.005). Smoothness (p < 0.01) and Tremor (p < 0.02) both improved after STN and Vim DBS. Variability improved only with Vim DBS. Neither STN nor Vim DBS significantly changed Tightness. CONCLUSIONS: All major spiral indices, except Tightness, improved after DBS. This suggests spiral analysis monitors DBS effects in PD and provides an objective window on relevant clinical features that change post-operatively. It may thus have utilization in clinical trials or investigations into the neural pathways altered by DBS. The lack of change in Tightness supports the notion that DBS does not improve micrographia.