Prognosis-related novel immunostaining pattern for programmed cell death ligand 1 and prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer.

This study aims to determine the prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in triple- negative breast cancer (TNBC). PD-L1 expression and TIL percentage were determined in TNBCs that did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. The relationship between PD-L1 expression and the percentage of TILs with survival was investigated. The presence of intratumoural PD-L1-positive tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in tumours with ≥ 1% PD-L1 expression was identified as a new PD-L1 evaluation parameter. The presence of intratumoural PD-L1-positive TIICs as a new parameter in PD-L1-positive cases increased overall survival. The percentage of TILs increased in both overall and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.040 and p = 0.006, respectively). As a result, it was found that the risk of death was increased 5.18-fold (p = 0.013) in patients without intratumoural PD-L1-positive TIICs. This risk of death was calculated to be 5.40-fold higher in patients with TIL percentage ≤ 10% than in those with > 40% (p = 0.024), and the risk of distant metastasis was calculated to be 11.95 times higher. In our study, we discovered that the percentage of TILs made a statistically significant difference in TNBC survival. The presence of intratumoural PD-L1-positive TIICs in PD-L1-positive cases significantly increased survival.

Prognostic impact of mitosis and necrosis in non-mucinous lung adenocarcinomas and correlation with IASLC grading system.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the International Lung Cancer Study Group (IASLC) Pathology Committee established a grading system for non-mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas. This grading system is based on whether areas of high-grade patterns are present in more than 20% of the tumor. Parameters, such as necrosis, mitotic activity, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and spread through air spaces (STAS), are excluded from evaluating the grading system. METHODS: A total of 217 patients' lung resection materials for primary lung adenocarcinoma were re-reviewed using the IASLC grading system. Necrosis, mitotic activity, LVI status and STAS were also evaluated in the resection materials, aiming to demonstrate the relationship between these histopathological features and clinical outcome data. RESULTS: At all stages, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were related to grade (p=0.011 and 0.024, respectively). Additionally, patients with necrosis were associated with worse OS and RFS (p=0.002 and 0.048, respectively). When grade 2 and 3 tumors were analyzed individually, a significant relationship was found between necrosis and OS in grade 3 tumors (p=0.002). Patients with a high mitotic count (≥10/10 high-power fields) had significantly worse OS (p=0.046). The prevalence of LVI and STAS increased with grade; however, their prognostic significance has not been demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The new grading system provides a highly efficient prognostic classification for survival. Necrosis and high mitotic count are important prognostic parameters for survival. Additionally, necrosis is a stage-independent prognostic factor for OS in grade 3 tumors, although no effect on prognosis can be demonstrated in grade 2 tumors.

Comparison of PD-L1, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 Status Between Surgical Samples and Cytological Samples in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The expression levels of Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase gene (ALK), and proto-oncogene tyrosineprotein kinase 1 ROS (ROS1) are important for targeted treatment selection in advanced lung cancer. Most patients with lung cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage and have no chance of surgery. For this reason, the accuracy and reliability of cytology samples for detecting those markers is important in patients whose histological sampling cannot be performed. AIMS: To test the compatibility of histological and cytological sample analysis results of EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PDL-1 in patients with NSCLC and to determine the adequacy of cytological analysis for PD-L1 expression. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: The results of 231 patients whose PD-L1 was studied in 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We excluded 11 inappropriate samples. A total of 220 samples were distributed as follows; 66 (30.0%) cytology specimens, 64 (29.1%) small histology biopsies, and 90 (40.9%) surgical biopsies. EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 analysis were performed in 139, 134, 116, and 220 patients, respectively. Samples containing >400 cells were considered suitable for molecular cytological study. RESULTS: A total of 154 (70.0%) histological (surgical biopsy) and 66 (30.0%) cytology samples were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference between histological and cytological samples in terms of cellular adequacy for all molecular markers [EGFR: 93.7% and 90.9% (P = .556), ALK: 97.8% and 95.3% (P = .436) , ROS1: 89.9% vs. 91.9% (P = .729), PD-L1: 95.5% vs. 92.4% (P = .364)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the expression positivity rates of all biomarkers between histological and cytological samples [EGFR: 9.0% vs. 2.5% (P = .018), ALK: 7.9% vs. 9.8% (P = .719), ROS1 : 1.4% vs. 2.9% (P = .591), PD-L1: 54.4% vs. 41.0% (P = .078)]. CONCLUSION: The cellular adequacy of cytology specimens for molecular testing in patients with NSCLC is satisfactory. This study shows that EGFR, ALK, ROS-1 and PDL-1 expression rates in cytological samples are not statistically different from histological samples.