Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Toxicol ; 40(11): 1566-1587, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662109

RESUMO

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are regulated tobacco products and often contain flavor compounds. Given the concern of increased use and the appeal of ENDS by young people, evaluating the potential of flavors to induce DNA damage is important for health hazard identification. In this study, alternative methods were used as prioritization tools to study the genotoxic mode of action (MoA) of 150 flavor compounds. In particular, clastogen-sensitive (γH2AX and p53) and aneugen-sensitive (p-H3 and polyploidy) biomarkers of DNA damage in human TK6 cells were aggregated through a supervised three-pronged ensemble machine learning prediction model to prioritize chemicals based on genotoxicity. In addition, in silico quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were used to predict genotoxicity and carcinogenic potential. The in vitro assay identified 25 flavors as positive for genotoxicity: 15 clastogenic, eight aneugenic and two with a mixed MoA (clastogenic and aneugenic). Twenty-three of these 25 flavors predicted to induce DNA damage in vitro are documented in public literature to be in e-liquid or in the aerosols produced by ENDS products with youth-appealing flavors and names. QSAR models predicted 46 (31%) of 150 compounds having at least one positive call for mutagenicity, clastogenicity or rodent carcinogenicity, 49 (33%) compounds were predicted negative for all three endpoints, and remaining compounds had no prediction call. The parallel use of these predictive technologies to elucidate MoAs for potential genetic damage, hold utility as a screening strategy. This study is the first high-content and high-throughput genotoxicity screening study with an emphasis on flavors in ENDS products.


Assuntos
Dano ao DNA , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Aromatizantes/toxicidade , Aprendizado de Máquina , Modelos Moleculares , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Animais , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Aromatizantes/química , Citometria de Fluxo , Histonas/metabolismo , Humanos , Camundongos , Fosforilação , Relação Quantitativa Estrutura-Atividade , Ratos , Medição de Risco , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo
2.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 62: 104684, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618670

RESUMO

The evaluation of tobacco products is complex due to a multitude of factors including product diversity, limited testing standards, and variability in user behavior. Alternative approaches in current testing paradigms have limitations that generally truncate their applicability beyond screening for hazard identification; this is also true for toxicological evaluations of tobacco products. In a regulatory context, results from tobacco product toxicity assessments are extrapolated to the in vivo condition to assess human health relevance at the individual and population level. A key limitation of alternative approaches is the difficulty and uncertainty in extrapolating results to adverse outcomes relevant to chronic tobacco exposures in humans. This difficulty and uncertainty are increased when comparing toxicological outcomes between tobacco products. Given that the interpretation and quantification of differences in assay results (e.g., mutagenicity) for tobacco product comparison may be inconclusive, the predictive value of these approaches for human risk of relevant downstream pathologies (e.g., carcinogenesis) can be limited. Development and validation of fit-for-purpose alternative approaches that are predictive of human toxicity and dose response assays with adequate sensitivity and specificity for product comparisons would help advance the field of predictive toxicology.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/tendências , Produtos do Tabaco/toxicidade , Animais , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Humanos
3.
Reprod Toxicol ; 68: 154-163, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496716

RESUMO

Environmental factors, including exogenous exposures and nutritional status, can affect DNA methylation across the epigenome, but effects of exposures on age-dependent epigenetic drift remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that early-life exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and/or variable diet results in altered epigenetic drift, as measured longitudinally via target loci methylation in paired mouse tail tissue (3 wks/10 mos old). Methylation was quantified at two repetitive elements (LINE-1, IAP), two imprinted genes (Igf2, H19), and one non-imprinted gene (Esr1) in isogenic mice developmentally exposed to Control, Control+BPA (50µg/kg diet), Mediterranean, Western, Mediterranean+BPA, or Western+BPA diets. Across age, methylation levels significantly (p<0.050) decreased at LINE-1, IAP, and H19, and increased at Esr1. Igf2 demonstrated Western-specific changes in early-life methylation (p=0.027), and IAP showed marginal negative modification of drift in Western (p=0.058) and Western+BPA (p=0.051). Thus, DNA methylation drifts across age, and developmental nutritional exposures can alter age-related methylation patterns.


Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/toxicidade , Metilação de DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Dieta , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade , Epigênese Genética/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenóis/toxicidade , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Animais , Feminino , Camundongos , Estado Nutricional , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/genética , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...