Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications.

PURPOSE: Generally, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor analgesia is performed in the lateral or sitting position; however, only few studies have investigated the effect of maternal position on labor analgesia induction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the influence of maternal position on induction time and complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed anesthetic and medical records regarding labor analgesia in 201 parturients treated between January 2019 and November 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their position (sitting or lateral) during induction. The primary outcome was the time required for CSEA induction. We compared 2 groups on the primary outcome and the occurrences of other complications during CSEA induction using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Moreover, we performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with induction time. RESULTS: There was no significant between-group difference in the time required for induction. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed an independent association of the distance from the skin to the epidural space with the time required for induction. The lateral group had a significantly higher incidence of paresthesia than the sitting group (P = 0.028). The lateral group had a significantly higher ephedrine requirement (P < 0.001) than the sitting group. CONCLUSION: Maternal position was not associated with the time required for CSEA induction. However, the sitting group had a lower paresthesia occurrence and ephedrine requirement than the lateral group. Other technical complications were not associated with maternal position during CSEA induction.

Anesthetic management in a patient with severe tracheal stenosis by monitoring oxygen reserve index.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia for tracheal stenting is challenging because of difficult ventilation and accompanying hypoxia. We report the use of oxygen reserve index (ORi™) during tracheal stenting. CASE PRESENTATION: Cauterization of an intratracheal tumor and tracheal stenting was scheduled in a patient. ORi decreased from 0.3 to 0.2 after starting cauterization using a flexible bronchoscope through a tracheal tube with 28% oxygen, while SpO2 was maintained at 100%. ORi further decreased to 0, followed by a decrease of SpO2 < 90%, and surgery was interrupted. SpO2 was increased shortly after increasing FiO2 to 1.0, but ORi remained 0 when surgery was resumed; it was increased after completion of cauterization. Both ORi and SpO2 were maintained above 0.4 and 98%, respectively, during tracheal stenting through a rigid bronchoscope under intrapulmonary percussive ventilation. CONCLUSION: ORi was useful for predicting a decrease of SpO2 under general anesthesia for tracheal stenting.