Provider Perceptions for Withdrawing Life Sustaining Therapies at a Large Pediatric Hospital.

CONTEXT: More than 74% of pediatric deaths occur in an intensive care unit (ICU), with 40% occurring after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WOLST). No needs assessment has described provider needs or suggestions for improving the WOLST process in pediatrics. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe interdisciplinary provider self-reported confidence, needs, and suggestions for improving the WOLST process. METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. An online survey was distributed to providers involved in WOLSTs in a quaternary children's hospital between January and December 2018. The survey assessed providers' self-reported confidence in their role, in providing guidance to families about the WOLST, experiences with the WOLST process, areas for improvement, and symptom management. Kruskal-Wallis testing was used for quantitative data analysis with P values <0.05 considered significant. Analysis was performed with SPSS v27. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti.8 and NVivo. RESULTS: A total of 297 surveys were received (48% survey completion) that consisted of multiple choice, Likert-type, and yes/no questions with options for open-ended responses. Mean provider self-rated confidence was high and varied significantly between disciplines. Qualitative analysis identified four areas for refining communication: 1) between the primary team and family, 2) within the primary team, 3) between the primary team and consulting providers, and 4) logistical challenges. CONCLUSIONS: While participants' self-rated confidence was high, it varied between disciplines. Participants identified opportunities for improved communication and planning before a WOLST. Future work includes development and implementation of a best practice guideline to address gaps and standardize care delivery.

Competencies and Milestones for Bioethics Trainees: Beyond ASBH's Healthcare Ethics Certification and Core Competencies.

Clinical ethics training programs are responsible for preparing their trainees to be competent ethics consultants worthy of the trust of patients, families, surrogates, and healthcare professionals. While the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) offers a certification examination for healthcare ethics consultants, no tools exist for the formal evaluation of ethics trainees to assess their progress toward competency. Medical specialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) use milestones to report trainees' progress along a continuum of professional development as a means of "operationalizing and implementing" medical competencies. Utilizing the Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation and the ACGME and American Board of Pediatrics' (ABP) Pediatric Milestones Project, we developed milestones for 17 subcompetencies in clinical ethics consultation and academic bioethics. As the field of clinical ethics becomes more standardized, such tools will be needed to promote the development of robust training programs and to certify that their graduates are competent practitioners.

Requests for Accommodation in Brain Death Cases: Emerging Role for Pediatric Palliative Care.

Death by neurologic criteria is a diagnosis that has presented complexities since its inception and pediatric cases are no exception. While rare, families may request accommodation to deviate from the traditionally defined diagnostic pathway based on their beliefs, mistrust of the diagnosis, or other complex reasons. Palliative care consultation offers a unique clinical perspective to complement the work of intensivists to support families through the diagnosis and possible resolution around accommodation requests. With misinformation and high-profile cases widely visible to the public through the media, these requests require a thoughtful and informed clinical approach by all members of the interdisciplinary clinical team. Common themes in many of these cases are trauma, bias and their impact on caregivers. We use a case-based approach to explore these complexities and clinical tools.

Pediatric Death by Neurologic Criteria: The Ever-Changing Landscape and the Expanding Role of Palliative Care Professionals.

Pediatric palliative care providers are especially suited to support families and medical teams facing a potential diagnosis of brain death, or death by neurologic criteria (DNC), when a child suffers a devastating brain injury. To support pediatric palliative care providers' effectiveness in this role, this article elucidates the clinical determination of DNC and the evolution of the ethical and legal controversies surrounding DNC. Conceptual definitions of death used in the context of DNC have been and continue to be debated amongst academicians, and children's families often have their own concept of death. Increasingly, families have brought legal cases challenging the definition of death, arguing for a right to refuse examination to diagnose DNC, and/or voicing religious objections. We describe these conceptual definitions and legal challenges then explore some potential reasons why families may dispute a determination of DNC. We conclude that working with patients, families, and healthcare providers facing DNC carries inherent and unique challenges suited to intervention by interdisciplinary palliative care teams.