RESUMO
Globally, liver diseases accounts for 4% of all deaths. Annually, over 2 million deaths occur due to preventable causes of chronic liver diseases and liver cancer like fatty liver diseases (alcoholic or non alcoholic) and viral hepatitis B and C. The burden of chronic liver diseases are increasing, and the epidemiology and demographics of people affected by these diseases are changing. Policy changes, vaccination, screening, lifestyle changes and public health awareness is the key to curb down liver disaeses. To achieve the ultimate goal of reducing mortality and linkage to care for those who need specialized care for liver disease, it is vital to have dedicated preventive hepatology clinics in sync with existing liver or gastroenterology clinics at tertary care level.
RESUMO
Introduction The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is continuously evolving, and many mutant variants of the virus are circulating in the world. Recurrent waves of COVID-19 have caused enormous mortality all across the globe. Considering the novelty of the virus, it becomes crucial for healthcare experts and policymakers to understand the demographic and clinical attributes of inpatient deaths in the first and second waves of COVID-19. Methods This hospital record-based comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India. The study included all COVID-19 RT PCR-positive patients admitted to the hospital during the first wave, from 1st April 2020 to 31st January 2021, and the second wave from 1st March 2021 to 30th June 2021. Comparisons were made with respect to demographic, clinical, laboratory parameters, and course of hospital stay. Results The study exhibited 11.34% more casualties in the second wave, with the number of deaths being 424 and 475 for the first and second waves, respectively. A male preponderance of mortality was evident in both waves with significant differences (p=0.004). There was no significant difference in age between the two waves (p=0.809). The significantly different comorbidities were hypertension (p=0.003) and coronary artery disease (p=0.014). The clinical manifestations demonstrating a significant difference were cough (p=0.000), sore throat (p=0.002), altered mental status (p=0.002), headache (p=0.025), loss of taste and smell (p=0.001), and tachypnea (p=0.000). The lab parameters with a significant difference across both waves were lymphopenia (p=0.000), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (p=0.004), leukocytosis (p=0.008), and thrombocytopenia (p=0.004). During the hospital course of the second wave, in terms of intensive care unit stay, the need for non-invasive ventilation and inotrope support was higher. The complications manifesting in the form of acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis were observed more in the second wave. A significant difference was discerned in the median duration of hospital stay in both waves (p=0.000). Conclusion Despite being of shorter duration, the second wave of COVID-19 culminated in more deaths. The study demonstrated that most of the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics attributed to mortality were more common during the second wave of COVID-19, including lab parameters, complications, and duration of hospital stays. The unpredictable nature of COVID-19 waves calls for instituting a well-planned surveillance mechanism in place to identify the surge in cases at the earliest possible time and prompt response, along with developing infrastructure and capacity to manage complications.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 vaccines are now accessible to all Indian citizens. Infection with COVID-19, on the other hand, continues to spread constantly. Our study aimed to determine the number of persons who had COVID-19 infections despite receiving the recommended number of doses of the COVID-19 vaccination at AIIMS Rishikesh, a tertiary care facility in Uttarakhand, India. METHODS: We analysed meticulously preserved data regarding COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 infection, clinical symptoms, and RT-PCR testing among all HCWs in our healthcare institution from 16 January 2021 to 30th June 2021. RESULTS: During this period, 5273 (90.3%) HCWs received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, while 566 (9.7%) received only one dose. 628 HCWs (10.8%) were BBV152 recipients and 5211 (89.2%) were AZD1222 (ChAdOx1-S) recipients. 423 HCWs (7.2%, confidence interval of 95% - 13.8, 22.0) reported COVID-19 infections. 274 (5.19% of total vaccinated HCWs) breakthrough infections and 149 non-breakthrough COVID-19 infections were reported in HCWs who had previously received a single dose of the COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: Viral infections, especially breakthrough infections, following adequate vaccination, are a cause for concern, but there is a lack of data on these infections in the actual world. Therefore, the primary focus of research should be on the emergence of illness in India following the completion of a full vaccine course.
