Longitudinal relationship between clinical course and neurocognitive impairments in bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the relationship between clinical course and trajectory of neurocognitive functioning during a follow-up period in a sample of euthymic bipolar patients. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with BD performed two-neurocognitive assessment separated by a period of at least 48 months. The clinical course during the follow-up period was documented by: three measures 1) number of affective episodes, 2) time spent ill, and 3) mood instability. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 73.21 months. Neurocognitive performance tended to be stable throughout the follow-up. Performance in verbal memory and executive functions at the end of study were related with the number of hypo/manic episodes and time spent with hypo/manic symptoms during the follow-up. None of the clinical measures considered were related to changes in neurocognitive performance over the follow-up period. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small sample size limits the value of subgroup analysis. The study design does not rule out some risk of selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Although there may be a positive relationship between number of episodes and neurocognitive deficits in patients with bipolar disorder, successive episodes do not seem to modify the trajectory of neurocognitive functioning over time. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Functional Outcome in the Middle Course of Bipolar Disorder: A Longitudinal Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcome of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). At baseline and after a follow-up period of at least 48 months, three measures of functioning were administered: psychosocial functioning (GAF), employment status (full-time, part-time, and unemployment/disability), and a self-reported measure of functional recovery. At baseline, patients with more than five previous affective episodes exhibited poorer outcomes on all measures of functioning than patients with less than five previous episodes. However, along a mean follow-up period of 77 months, measures of functioning tended to remain stable or improved slightly. These results highlight the limitation of studies comparing measures of functioning between patients with many and few episodes to evaluate functional outcome. Likewise, these preliminary results do not support the hypothesis that functional outcome deteriorates over the course of BD.

Accuracy of the number of previous episodes reported by patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: The number of previous episodes in patients with BD is a variable widely used for both clinical and research purposes. The aim of this study was to compare the number of episodes retrospectively reported by euthymic BD subjects with that registered by their psychiatrists during a follow-up period. METHODS: Fifty euthymic patients with BD and more than 2years of follow-up were retrospectively asked in a standardized fashion about the number of hypomanic/manic and depressive episodes suffered during that period. Patient-reported outcomes were compared with the number of episodes registered by psychiatrists in a life chart during the same period. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of patients was 66.70months. There was a mean difference of 2.74 episodes between reports of patients' and psychiatrists' reports during the complete follow-up period; Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.40 (CI95%=0.15-0.61). This difference increased with the duration of the follow-up period (R=0.33, p=0.023) and with the number of episodes occurred during that (R=0.32, p=0.023). The difference between patient-reported and clinician-rated in the number of depressive during the follow-up period was more pronounced in BDII than in BDI (Z=-2.47, p=0.014), and it correlated with the number of previous depressive episodes at baseline (R=0.28, p=0.047) and subclinical depressive symptoms (R=0.41, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The number of previous episodes referred by patients with BD is not an accurate measure of the true number of episodes suffered. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Sexual risk behaviors among women with bipolar disorder.

The aim of this study was to investigate sexual health and sexual risk behaviors for sexually transmitted infections (STI) among women with bipolar disorder (BDW). Sixty-three euthymic women diagnosed with bipolar disorder type I, II or not otherwise specified were included and matched with a control group of 63 healthy women. Demographic and clinical data, structured sexual health measures and extensive assessment of sexual risk behavior were obtained and compared between groups. BDW had casual partners, were in non-monogamous sexual partnerships and had sex with partners with unknown HIV condition more frequently than healthy control women. History of two or more STI was more frequent among BDW. Inclusion of sexual behavior risk assessment among BDW in treatment is necessary to better identify those women with higher risk for STI and to take measures to improve their sexual health.

Unplanned pregnancies and reproductive health among women with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate reproductive health and level of planning of pregnancies among women with bipolar disorder (BDW). METHODS: 63 euthymic women, with bipolar disorder type I, II or not otherwise specified diagnosis, were included and were matched with a control group of 63 healthy women. Demographic and clinical data, structured reproductive health measures and planning level of pregnancies were obtained and compared between groups. RESULTS: Lower level of planning of pregnancies and higher frequency of unplanned pregnancies were found among BDW. Women with bipolar disorder reported history of voluntary interruption of pregnancies more frequent than women from control group. Current reproductive health care showed no differences between groups. LIMITATIONS: Data based on self-report of participants and retrospective nature of some collected measures may be affected by information bias. The pregnancy planning measure has not been validated in this population before. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample study limit generalization of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse reproductive events, as unplanned pregnancies and elective interruption of pregnancies, may be more frequent among BDW. Clinician must be aware of the reproductive health during treatment of young BDW and take measures to improve better family planning access.

Toward the identification of neurocognitive subtypes in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional and meta-analytic studies showed that patients with bipolar disorder (BD) had neurocognitive impairments even during periods of euthymia. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of BD patients with and without clinically significant cognitive impairments, as well as to analyze clinical and functional variables in these subgroups. METHODS: Hundred patients with BD and 40 healthy controls were assessed with an extensive neurocognitive assessment. Soft (some cognitive domain with a performance below 1.5 SD of the mean) and hard (at least two domains with values below 2 SD of the mean) criteria were utilized to define clinically significant cognitive impairments. RESULTS: Using both soft and hard criteria, the prevalence of clinically significant cognitive impairments was higher in people with BD than in healthy controls. 70% of patients only showed failures of small effect (d=0.21-0.35) in 2 measures of executive functions. Moreover, 30% of patients were indistinguishable from healthy subjects in terms of both neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning. On the contrary, 30% of the sample showed more severe cognitive deficits than those usually reported in literature and had the worst psychosocial functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that cognitive impairments are very heterogeneous among euthymic patients with BD could contribute to understanding differences in functional outcome. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Neurocognitive impairments and their relationship with psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar II disorder.

The aim of this study was to compare neurocognitive functioning between euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder (BDI), bipolar II disorder (BDII), and healthy controls. An additional aim was to estimate the relationship between neurocognitive impairments and psychosocial functioning. Eighty-seven patients with BDI (n = 48) or BDII (n = 39) and 39 healthy controls were included. All subjects completed an extensive neurocognitive battery. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the General Assessment of Functioning. Patients with BDII performed more poorly than did the controls in measures of psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and executive functioning. Patient groups did not show differences in any of the cognitive measures assessed. The performance in trail-making test B was the only independent predictor of psychosocial functioning in both patient groups. Patients with BDII have cognitive impairments, and this has a negative influence on their functional outcome. Our results bring additional support to the notion that BDII disorder is not a merely mild type of BDI.

Neurocognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional outcome in bipolar disorders: a prospective 1 year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the predictive value of cognitive impairments and time spent ill in long-term functional outcome of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Thirty five patients with euthymic BD completed a neurocognitive battery to assess verbal memory, attention, and executive functions at study entry. The course of illness was documented prospectively for a period longer than 12 months using a modified life charting technique based on the NIMH life-charting method. Psychosocial functioning was assessed with the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) at the end of follow-up period when patients were euthymic. RESULTS: Impairments in verbal memory and in attention, as well as subsyndromal depressive symptomatology were independent predictors of GAF score at the end of the study explaining 43% of variance. Similarly, impairments in attention and executive functioning were independent predictors of FAST score explaining 28% of variance. LIMITATIONS: We did not control factors that could affect functional outcome such as psychosocial interventions, familiar support and housing and financial resources. CONCLUSIONS: Both cognitive impairments and time spent with subsyndromal depressive symptomatology may be illness features associated with poorer long-term functional outcome. Developing strategies to treat these illness features might contribute to enhance long-term functional outcome among patients with BD.

Heterogeneity in cognitive functioning among patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays it is not clear if in bipolar disorders (BD) cognitive impairments are heterogeneous and if so which are the variables that determine it. METHODS: Fifty patients with BD and thirty healthy controls were clinically evaluated including measures of obstetric complications history. All subjects completed an extensive neuropsychological battery selected to asses premorbid IQ and different cognitive domains. RESULTS: Compared with standardized norms, 38% of patients had none cognitive domain affected, while 40% had 1 to 2, and 22% had 3 to 5. Patients with cognitive functioning within normal limits had higher psychosocial functioning and premorbid IQ, and lower history of obstetric complications. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size could limit the generalizability of the results; since these data should be taken as preliminaries. CONCLUSIONS: The extension and severity of cognitive impairments may be heterogeneous in patients with BD, and it might contribute to explain the variability in functional outcome. Bipolar patients with low premorbid IQ and history of obstetric complications may represent a subgroup with lower cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning.

Cognitive and motor features in elderly people with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Although elderly people will represent one third of the bipolar population in a few years, data about cognitive and motor features in these patients are very scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive and motor functioning between elderly euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls, as well as to determine the degree of correlation with psychosocial functioning. METHODS: Euthymic older adults with BD (n=20) and healthy controls (n=20) were evaluated with traditional clinical instruments and measures of exposure to psychotropic drugs and extrapyramidal symptoms. All subjects completed an extensive neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: Patients with BD had more extrapyramidal symptoms and worse performance than healthy controls in psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and executive functions even after controlling sub-clinical symptomatology. These findings were not associated with age at onset or length of illness or with current pharmacological exposure. Psychosocial functioning correlated negatively with performance in psychomotor speed and executive function, and with extrapyramidal symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult patients with BD in a euthymic state could have a similar cognitive and motor profile to that described in younger euthymic bipolar patients. Cognitive-motor disturbances may help to explain impairments in daily functioning among elderly patients with bipolar disorder during remission.