Towards improved 3D reconstruction of cystoscopies through real-time feedback for frame reacquisition.

Cystoscopic video can be cumbersome to review; however, preservation of data in the form of 3D bladder reconstructions has the potential to improve patient care. Unfortunately, not all cystoscopy videos produce viable reconstructions, because their underlying frames contain artifacts such as motion blur and bladder debris, which consequently make them unusable for 3D reconstructions. Here, we develop a real-time pipeline, termed the Assessment and Feedback Pipeline (AFP), that alerts clinicians when unusable frames are detected and encourages them to recollect the last few seconds of data. We show that the AFP classifies frames as usable or unusable with a balanced accuracy of 81.60% and demonstrate that use of the AFP improves 3D reconstruction coverage. These results suggest that clinical implementation of the AFP would improve 3D reconstruction quality through real-time detection and recollection of unusable frames.

Fiberscopic pattern removal for optimal coverage in 3D bladder reconstructions of fiberscope cystoscopy videos.

Purpose: In the current clinical standard of care, cystoscopic video is not routinely saved because it is cumbersome to review. Instead, clinicians rely on brief procedure notes and still frames to manage bladder pathology. Preserving discarded data via 3D reconstructions, which are convenient to review, has the potential to improve patient care. However, many clinical videos are collected by fiberscopes, which are lower cost but induce a pattern on frames that inhibit 3D reconstruction. The aim of our study is to remove the honeycomb-like pattern present in fiberscope-based cystoscopy videos to improve the quality of 3D bladder reconstructions. Approach: Our study introduces an algorithm that applies a notch filtering mask in the Fourier domain to remove the honeycomb-like pattern from clinical cystoscopy videos collected by fiberscope as a preprocessing step to 3D reconstruction. We produce 3D reconstructions with the video before and after removing the pattern, which we compare with a metric termed the area of reconstruction coverage (ARC), defined as the surface area (in pixels) of the reconstructed bladder. All statistical analyses use paired t-tests. Results: Preprocessing using our method for pattern removal enabled reconstruction for all (n=5) cystoscopy videos included in the study and produced a statistically significant increase in bladder coverage (p=0.018). Conclusions: This algorithm for pattern removal increases bladder coverage in 3D reconstructions and automates mask generation and application, which could aid implementation in time-starved clinical environments. The creation and use of 3D reconstructions can improve documentation of cystoscopic findings for future surgical navigation, thus improving patient treatment and outcomes.

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cxbladder Triage to Cystoscopy in Patients With Microhematuria: The Safe Testing of Risk for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Trial.

PURPOSE: AUA guidelines for patients with microhematuria (≥3 red blood cells [RBC]/high-power field [hpf]) include cystoscopy for most over age 40 due to risk of urothelial cancer (UC). Cxbladder Triage (CxbT) is a urinary genomic test with UC negative predictive value of 99%. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared cystoscopy use in a standard of care (SOC) arm vs a marker-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with hematuria provided urine for a CxbT. Those categorized as lower risk (LR), defined as 3 to 29 RBC/hpf and minimal smoking history (<10 pack-years) were randomized between the test group provided with the CxbT result vs the SOC control group. Negative CxbT patients were offered omission of cystoscopy with surveillance. "Not lower risk" (NLR) patients (>30 RBC/hpf or >10 pack-year smoking history) had a CxbT but otherwise SOC. Patient decision and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of 390 eligible patients, 255 were NLR and 135 were LR randomized to CxbT informed decision or SOC. The median age was 62 years (range 18-94) and 54% were male. Overall, 63% of CxbT tests were negative. For NLR patients, 82% had cystoscopy. In the LR control group, cystoscopy was performed in 67% of SOC and 27% in the test group (relative risk 0.41 [95% CI 0.27-0.61]). Compared to cystoscopy, CxbT had 90% sensitivity, 56% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value for UC. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, use of CxbT in patients with LR hematuria resulted in 59% reduction of cystoscopy use. This clinical utility of CxbT can reduce the burden of unnecessary cystoscopies.

Interruptions in bladder cancer care during the COVID-19 public health emergency.

BACKGROUND: Academic and community urology centers participating in a pragmatic clinical trial in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer completed monthly surveys assessing restrictions in aspects of bladder cancer care due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Our objective was to describe pandemic-related restrictions on bladder cancer care. METHODS: We invited 32 sites participating in a multicenter pragmatic bladder cancer trial to complete monthly surveys distributed through REDCap beginning in May 2020. These surveys queried sites on whether they were experiencing restrictions in the use of elective surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), radical cystectomy, office cystoscopy, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) availability. Responses were collated with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 32 eligible sites, 21 sites had at least a 50% monthly response rate over the study period and were included in the analysis. Elective surgery was paused at 76% of sites in May 2020, 48% of sites in January 2021, and 52% of sites in January 2022. Over those same periods, coinciding with COVID-19 incidence waves, TURBT was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 14% of sites, respectively, radical cystectomy was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 19% of sites, respectively, and cystoscopy was restricted at 33%, 0%, and 10% of sites, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder cancer care was minimally restricted compared with more pronounced restrictions seen in general elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Enhancing the image quality of blue light cystoscopy through green-hue correction and fogginess removal.

Blue light cystoscopy (BLC) is a guideline-recommended endoscopic tool to detect bladder cancer with high sensitivity. Having clear, high-quality images during cystoscopy is crucial to the sensitive, efficient detection of bladder tumors; yet, important diagnostic information is often missed or poorly visualized in images containing illumination artifacts or impacted by impurities in the bladder. In this study, we introduce computational methods to remove two common artifacts in images from BLC videos: green hue and fogginess. We also evaluate the effect of artifact removal on the perceptual quality of the BLC images through a survey study and computation of Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial Quality Evaluator scores on the original and enhanced images. We show that corrections and enhancements made to cystoscopy images resulted in a better viewing experience for clinicians during BLC imaging and reliably restored lost tissue features that were important for diagnostics. Incorporating these enhancements during clinical and OR procedures may lead to more comprehensive tumor detection, fewer missed tumors during TURBT procedures, more complete tumor resection and shorter procedure time. When used in off-line review of cystoscopy videos, it may also better guide surgical planning and allow more accurate assessment and diagnosis.

The Role of Alumni Networks and Career Advising in Early Career Stability of Urologists: Results of a Multi-institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize training program and early career factors that impact decision-making and job retention following graduation in a diverse population of urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a computer-based survey distributed to residency graduates from 25 urology training programs. Five focus institutions were identified with a goal >30% response rate. The survey included questions about training program specifics and post-training employment characteristics. RESULTS: We obtained 180 responses from urology residency graduates of 25 programs. Overall, 72% (N = 129) remain in their initial post-training position at a median of 6years postgraduation (Interquartile Range (IQR) 3-10). On Cox-regression analysis stronger trainee-rated formal career advising was associated with lower risk of changing jobs (HR 0.77, 0.60-0.99, P = .048). Location/proximity to family was the most consistently cited as the top reason for selecting a job (41%). Sixty-three respondents (35%) joined practices employing graduates of the same residency program. Cox regression analysis showed that joining a practice with alumni of the same program was associated with lower risk of changing jobs from one's initial post-training position (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional study of urologists, we observed a high rate of job retention out to a median of 6years following completion of training, with formal career advising and joining alumni in practice being associated with job retention. Collectively, our data highlights that training programs should emphasize advising programs and alumni networking in guiding their graduates in the job search process.

The Other Pandemic, Racism, in Urology.

Racism is deeply ingrained in our society with lasting effects within medicine. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted racial disparities in the medical field, including in the field of Urology. This has led to investigation regarding the effects of racism on education, patient care, and research within Urology. This article aims to review current literature on the "other pandemic," structural racism, within medicine and specifically urology and provide ways to combat its impact.

Estimating the Impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the Out-of-Pocket Costs for Medicare Beneficiaries With Advanced Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Combination systemic therapy for advanced prostate cancer has reduced mortality, but high out-of-pocket costs impose financial barriers for patients. The Inflation Reduction Act's $2,000 out-of-pocket spending cap for Medicare's prescription drug benefit (Part D) can potentially lower out-of-pocket spending for beneficiaries starting in 2025. This study aims to compare out-of-pocket spending for commonly prescribed regimens for advanced prostate cancer before and after implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act. METHODS: Medication regimens constructed to treat metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer consisted of baseline androgen deprivation therapy with traditional chemotherapy, androgen receptor inhibitors, and androgen biosynthesis inhibitors. Using 2023 Medicare Part B prices and the Medicare Part D plan finder, we estimated annual out-of-pocket costs under current law and under the Inflation Reduction Act's redesigned standard Part D benefit. RESULTS: Under current law, out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs ranged from $464 to $11,336 per year. Under the Inflation Reduction Act, annual out-of-pocket costs for 2 regimens remained unchanged: androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy with abiraterone and prednisone. However, out-of-pocket costs for regimens using branded novel hormonal therapy were significantly lower under the 2025 law with potential savings estimated to be $9,336 (79.2%) for apalutamide, $9,036 (78.7%) for enzalutamide, and $8,480 (76.5%) for docetaxel and darolutamide. CONCLUSIONS: The $2,000 spending cap introduced by the Inflation Reduction Act may significantly decrease out-of-pocket costs and reduce financial toxicity associated with advanced prostate cancer treatment, impacting an estimated 25,000 Medicare beneficiaries.

Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of TAR-200 in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Who Refused or Were Unfit for Curative-intent Therapy: A Phase 1 Study.

PURPOSE: Half of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer worldwide may not receive curative-intent therapy. Elderly or frail patients are most affected by this unmet need. TAR-200 is a novel, intravesical drug delivery system that provides sustained, local release of gemcitabine into the bladder over a 21-day dosing cycle. The phase 1 TAR-200-103 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of TAR-200 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who either refused or were unfit for curative-intent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had cT2-cT3bN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. TAR-200 was inserted for 4 consecutive 21-day cycles over 84 days. The primary end points were safety and tolerability at 84 days. Secondary end points included rates of clinical complete response and partial response as determined by cystoscopy, biopsy, and imaging; duration of response; and overall survival. RESULTS: Median age of the 35 enrolled patients was 84 years, and most were male (24/35, 68.6%). Treatment-emergent adverse events related to TAR-200 occurred in 15 patients. Two patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events leading to removal of TAR-200. At 3 months, complete response and partial response rates were 31.4% (11/35) and 8.6% (3/35), respectively, yielding an overall response rate of 40.0% (14/35; 95% CI 23.9-57.9). Median overall survival and duration of response were 27.3 months (95% CI 10.1-not estimable) and 14 months (95% CI 10.6-22.7), respectively. Progression-free rate at 12 months was 70.5%. CONCLUSIONS: TAR-200 was generally safe, well tolerated, and had beneficial preliminary efficacy in this elderly and frail cohort with limited treatment options.

Updates to Advanced Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline (2023).

PURPOSE: In 2022 the American Urological Association (AUA) requested an Update Literature Review (ULR) to incorporate new evidence generated since the 2020 publication of this guideline. The resulting 2023 Guideline Amendment addresses updated recommendations for patients with advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ULR addressed 23 of the original 38 guideline statements and included an abstract-level review of eligible studies published since the 2020 systematic review. Sixteen studies were selected for full text review. The current summary presents the updates made to the Guideline as a result of that new literature. RESULTS: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Panel amended evidence- and consensus-based statements based on an updated review to aid clinicians in the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer. These statements are detailed herein. CONCLUSION: This Guideline Amendment provides a framework designed to improve a clinician's ability to treat patients diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer with the most current evidence-based information. Further research and publication of high-quality clinical trials will be essential to continue to improve the quality of care for these patients.