Pregabalin as adjunctive therapy in adult and pediatric patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures are the most common type of generalized seizure and more common in children than adults. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for GTC seizures in adults and children with epilepsy. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated pregabalin (5 mg/kg/day or 10 mg/kg/day) vs placebo as adjunctive therapy for 10 weeks (following a 2-week dose escalation), in pediatric and adult patients (aged 5-65 years) with GTC seizures. Primary endpoint was change in log-transformed 28-day seizure rate during active treatment. Secondary endpoints included responder rates, defined as proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in 28-day GTC seizure rate from baseline. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of 219 patients, 75, 72, and 72 were randomized to adjunctive pregabalin 5 mg/kg/day, 10 mg/kg/day, and placebo, respectively. Fifteen, 11, and 6 patients discontinued from the 5 mg/kg/day, 10 mg/kg/day, and placebo arms, respectively, most commonly due to adverse events (AEs; 10.7%, 6.9%, and 5.6%, respectively). A nonsignificant change in log-transformed mean 28-day seizure rate was seen with pregabalin 10 mg/kg/day vs placebo (least-squares [LS] mean difference -0.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.19 to 0.16]; P = .8889) and with pregabalin 5 mg/kg/day vs placebo (LS mean difference 0.02 [CI -0.15 to 0.19]; P = .8121). Similar observations were noted for adults and children. No significant differences were seen for secondary endpoints with pregabalin vs placebo, including responder rate. The most common AEs (≥10%) were dizziness, headache, and somnolence. Most were of mild/moderate intensity. Seven patients had serious AEs, with one death in the placebo arm (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy). SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive pregabalin treatment did not change GTC seizure rate in adults or children. The safety profile of pregabalin was similar to that known; treatment was well tolerated with few discontinuations due to AEs.

Effect of Baseline Characteristics on the Pain Response to Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Patients with Comorbid Depression.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of baseline characteristics on the treatment response to pregabalin in fibromyalgia (FM) patients with depression. Design: Post hoc analysis from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study of pregabalin (300 or 450 mg/day, twice daily). Subjects: A total of 193 FM patients taking an antidepressant for comorbid depression. Methods: The effect of patient baseline characteristics on the treatment response to pregabalin vs placebo was assessed for the primary efficacy end point (mean pain score on an 11-point numeric rating scale). Variables were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with sequence, period, and treatment as fixed factors, and subject within sequence and within subject error as random factors. Results: Pregabalin significantly improved mean pain scores vs placebo irrespective of age, duration of FM, number of prior FM medications, depression diagnosis, shorter-term depression (<10 years), prior or no prior opioid use, pain severity, anxiety severity, and sleep disruption severity (all P < 0.05). Compared with placebo, pregabalin did not significantly affect mean pain scores in patients with comorbid insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome, or gastroesophageal reflux disease; severe FM; a diagnosis of depression before FM, longer-term depression (≥ 10 years), more severe depression, or who were taking a high dose of antidepressant. Conclusions: Pregabalin significantly improved mean pain scores when compared with placebo for the majority of baseline characteristics assessed in FM patients taking an antidepressant for comorbid depression.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Controlled-Release Pregabalin for the Treatment of Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Double-Blind, Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy and safety of once-daily controlled-release (CR) formulation of pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. METHODS: An enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal trial, with 6-week single-blind pregabalin treatment phase and 13-week double-blind phase, where patients with ≥50% decrease in mean pain score at single-blind end point from baseline were randomized (1:1) to pregabalin CR (82.5 to 660 mg/d) or placebo. Primary efficacy outcome was time to loss of therapeutic response (LTR) (<30% decrease in weekly mean pain score from single-blind baseline or discontinuation due to adverse event or lack of efficacy). Secondary efficacy outcomes included change in weekly mean pain score (1-wk recall period) at double-blind end point. RESULTS: In total, 801 patients were randomized and treated in the single-blind phase, and 413 in the double-blind phase (208, pregabalin CR; 205, placebo). Pregabalin CR significantly increased time to LTR versus placebo (Kaplan-Meier analysis) with significantly fewer LTR events with pregabalin CR than with placebo (29 [13.9%] vs. 63 [30.7%]; P<0.0001). Median time to LTR was not estimable. Pregabalin CR significantly improved weekly mean pain score versus placebo: LS mean difference (95% CI) of -1.11 (-1.47, -0.75) and -1.00 (-1.34, -0.65) (P<0.0001) from single-blind baseline and double-blind baseline, respectively. Most commonly reported adverse events in the single-blind phase were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema. Pregabalin CR was well tolerated. DISCUSSION: Time to LTR was significantly longer with pregabalin CR than with placebo. Safety profile of pregabalin CR was comparable to that reported for the immediate-release formulation in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

There is tremendous interpatient variability in the response to analgesic therapy (even for efficacious treatments), which can be the source of great frustration in clinical practice. This has led to calls for "precision medicine" or personalized pain therapeutics (ie, empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for individual patients) that would presumably improve both the clinical care of patients with pain and the success rates for putative analgesic drugs in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. However, before implementing this approach, the characteristics of individual patients or subgroups of patients that increase or decrease the response to a specific treatment need to be identified. The challenge is to identify the measurable phenotypic characteristics of patients that are most predictive of individual variation in analgesic treatment outcomes, and the measurement tools that are best suited to evaluate these characteristics. In this article, we present evidence on the most promising of these phenotypic characteristics for use in future research, including psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, responses to noxious stimulation, endogenous pain-modulatory processes, and response to pharmacologic challenge. We provide evidence-based recommendations for core phenotyping domains and recommend measures of each domain.

Burden of illness in fibromyalgia patients with comorbid depression.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the burden of fibromyalgia (FM) in patients with FM taking antidepressant medication for comorbid depression. METHODS: Symptom burden, impact on work and activity, and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) was examined at randomisation in patients enrolled in a clinical trial. Symptom burden was estimated based on self-reported health status measures. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem scale adapted to FM and a separate HCRU questionnaire were completed. The relationship between FM severity and burden was evaluated. RESULTS: The total population analysed comprised 193 patients; 71 (36.8%) had moderate FM and 119 (61.7%) severe FM. Patients had moderate pain, severe impairment in functioning due to FM, sleep disruption, mild anxiety, and mild depression. In the 7 days preceding randomisation, an average of 58.0% overall work impairment was reported, with 15.2% of working hours missed and 54.0% productivity while at work. In the 3 months preceding randomisation, on average, 5.0 visits per patient were made to healthcare professionals. Physical treatments were used by 34.7% and supplements by 31.6% of patients. Prescription and non-prescription medications, as well as professional services providing help with activities of daily living (ADL) that are impacted by FM, were used by >75% of patients. In addition, 50.4 hours of unpaid help was provided for ADL assistance. Total out-of-pocket expenditures were US$307.1, €410.4, or C$211.3, depending on location. FM burden worsened with increasing FM severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the significant burden of FM in patients with comorbid depression treated with an antidepressant.

The Pharmacokinetics of Pregabalin in Breast Milk, Plasma, and Urine of Healthy Postpartum Women.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the presence of pregabalin in human breast milk of nursing mothers. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine pregabalin concentrations in breast milk, estimate the infant daily pregabalin dose from nursing mothers, and evaluate pregabalin pharmacokinetic data in lactating women (≥ 12 weeks postpartum). METHODS: In this multiple-dose, open-label, pharmacokinetic study, 4 doses of pregabalin 150 mg were administered orally at 12-hour intervals. Urine, blood, and breast milk samples were collected up to 12, 24, and 48 hours, respectively, following the fourth dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Ten healthy lactating women (age 24-37 years) received pregabalin. Geometric mean pregabalin Cmaxss and AUCτ values in breast milk were approximately 53% and 76%, respectively, of those for plasma. The mean amount of pregabalin in breast milk recovered in a 24-hour period after the last dose was 574 µg (range, 270-1720 µg), which is approximately 0.2% of the administered daily maternal dose of 300 mg. The estimated average daily infant dose of pregabalin from breast milk was 0.31 mg/kg/day, which would be approximately 7% (23% coefficient of variation) of the body weight normalized maternal dose. Approximately 89% of the dose administered was recovered in urine. Renal clearance averaged 68.2 mL/min. Adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Lactation appears to have had little influence on pregabalin pharmacokinetics. Overall, the estimated dose of pregabalin in breastfed children of women receiving pregabalin is low. Pregabalin was well tolerated in lactating women. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Peter A. Lockwood, Lynne Pauer, Joseph M. Scavone, Maud Allard, Laure Mendes da Costa, Tanja Alebic-Kolbah, Anna Plotka, Christine W. Alvey, and Marci L. Chew were all full-time employees of Pfizer at the time the study was completed and hold stock and/or stock options in Pfizer. FUNDING: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, which was involved in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the paper for publication. Medical writing support was provided by Penny Gorringe, MSc, of Engage Scientific Solutions and funded by Pfizer.

Pregabalin in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Using an NSAID for Other Pain Conditions: A Double-Blind Crossover Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pregabalin's efficacy and safety versus placebo to reduce pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) using a concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-masked, 14-week, 2-period, crossover study, patients with painful DPN using a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for non-DPN-related pain received 150 to 300 mg/d pregabalin or placebo (period 1); 14-day washout; then, the opposite therapy (period 2). Endpoints included weekly change in DPN pain score, sleep interference, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized (period 1) to 1 of the 2 following possible sequences: pregabalin→placebo (n=154) or placebo→pregabalin (n=147). Results of the primary efficacy measure, mean weekly DPN pain at endpoint, showed no significant difference between pregabalin and placebo. However, 1 sensitivity analysis (mixed-model repeated measures) found greater pain score reductions with pregabalin than placebo at weeks 2 to 4 and overall (all P<0.05). One secondary endpoint analysis, mean treatment difference in DPN-related sleep interference, favored pregabalin over placebo (P=0.0009). Other sensitivity and secondary analyses were nonsignificant. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin. DISCUSSION: Pregabalin (vs. placebo) showed overall improvements in sleep, pain reduction in 1 sensitivity analysis, and was well tolerated. Potential factors that may have confounded the ability to detect a treatment difference in DPN pain reduction (high placebo response, carryover effect, short washout period, or pregabalin dose) are discussed in the context of future studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin in Patients with Fibromyalgia and Comorbid Depression Taking Concurrent Antidepressant Medication: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess pregabalin efficacy and safety in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) with comorbid depression taking concurrent antidepressant medication. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-period, 2-way crossover study was composed of two 6-week treatment periods separated by a 2-week taper/washout phase. Patients with FM (aged ≥ 18 yrs) taking a stable dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) for depression were randomized 1:1 to receive pregabalin/placebo or placebo/pregabalin (optimized to 300 or 450 mg/day). Antidepressant medication was continued throughout the study. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean pain score on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Secondary efficacy outcomes included measures of anxiety, depression, patient function, and sleep. RESULTS: Of 197 patients randomized to treatment, 181 and 177 received ≥ 1 dose of pregabalin and placebo, respectively. At baseline, 52.3% of patients were taking an SSRI and 47.7% an SNRI, and mean pain score was 6.7. Mean pain scores at endpoint were statistically significantly reduced with pregabalin (least squares mean difference from placebo -0.61, 95% CI -0.91 - -0.31, p = 0.0001). Pregabalin significantly improved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (difference -0.95, p < 0.0001) and -Depression (difference -0.88, p = 0.0005) scores, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score (difference -6.60, p < 0.0001), and sleep quality (difference 0.57, p < 0.0001), but not EuroQol 5-Dimensions score (difference 0.02, p = 0.3854). Pregabalin safety was consistent with previous studies and current product labeling. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, pregabalin statistically significantly improved FM pain and other symptoms in patients taking antidepressant medication for comorbid depression. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01432236.

Effect of the gastrointestinal prokinetic agent erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of pregabalin controlled-release in healthy individuals: a phase I, randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The controlled-release (CR) formulation of pregabalin is designed to remain in the stomach for a prolonged period while slowly releasing pregabalin for absorption in the small intestine. This study evaluated the effect of the gastrointestinal prokinetic agent, erythromycin, on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of pregabalin CR 330 mg administered following an evening meal and the safety and tolerability of a single dose of pregabalin CR 330 mg when administered with and without multiple doses of erythromycin 500 mg. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover study. Participants received (in a randomized sequence) a single oral dose of pregabalin CR 330 mg alone and pregabalin CR 330 mg co-administered with multiple doses of erythromycin 500 mg. The CR formulation was administered immediately following a standardized 600-750 calorie 30 % fat evening meal. Erythromycin 500 mg was administered orally approximately 1 h prior to pregabalin CR, as well as 6 and 12 h following the first erythromycin dose. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-pregabalin CR dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from concentration-time data using standard noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Eighteen healthy participants (aged 19-52 years) received pregabalin CR. Co-administration of pregabalin CR with erythromycin resulted in a 17 % decrease in total exposure [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC∞)] and a 13 % decrease in peak plasma concentrations (C max) relative to pregabalin CR administered alone. The 90 % CI for the ratio of the adjusted geometric mean AUC∞ was 76.5-89.2 % (outside the 80-125 % range prespecified for bioequivalence). Adverse events were of mild to moderate severity and the adverse event profile was similar for pregabalin CR administered with and without erythromycin. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of multiple high doses of erythromycin resulted in 17 % lower pregabalin exposure for a single dose of pregabalin CR 330 mg than for pregabalin CR 330 mg administered alone. Although the two treatments did not achieve formal bioequivalence, the impact of co-administered erythromycin treatment was small and not considered clinically relevant.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain on Walking.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 2-period crossover study (two 6-week treatment periods separated by a 2-week washout period) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin (150 to 300 mg/d) for treatment of pain and pain on walking in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who experienced pain while walking. METHODS: Co-primary efficacy endpoints were: (1) mean pain score (last 7 daily pain diary scores, 0 to 10 numeric rating scale at end of each treatment period) and (2) DPN pain on walking (0 to 10 numeric rating scale immediately after walking 50 feet [15.2 m] on flat surface). Secondary endpoints included other pain parameters, patient-reported sleep, health-related quality of life, and safety measures. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients were treated (pregabalin, n=198; placebo, n=186), with no statistically significant treatment difference for pregabalin versus placebo in the co-primary efficacy endpoints, mean DPN pain (P=0.0656) and mean DPN pain on walking (P=0.412). A carryover effect was observed. Analysis of co-primary endpoints for period 1 showed significant treatment difference for DPN pain (P=0.034) and DPN pain on walking (P=0.001). Treatment with pregabalin resulted in significant improvements versus placebo on prespecified patient global impression of change (end of period 1; P=0.002), and sleep interference rating scale (end of period 2; P=0.011). Adverse events were more frequent with pregabalin than with placebo and caused discontinuation in 13 (6.6%) pregabalin patients versus 5 (2.7%) placebo patients. DISCUSSION: Failure to meet the co-primary objectives may be related to carryover effect from period 1 to period 2, lower pregabalin dose (150 to 300 mg/d), and/or placebo response in painful DPN.

Pharmacokinetics of pregabalin controlled-release in healthy volunteers: effect of food in five single-dose, randomized, clinical pharmacology studies.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetic properties of the immediate-release (IR) and the recently developed controlled-release (CR) formulation of pregabalin are dose proportional. Pregabalin IR can be taken with or without food. OBJECTIVES: This analysis characterizes the effect of food on pregabalin CR. The objectives of this analysis were: (1) to evaluate the effect of administration time and fat or caloric content of an accompanying meal on the pharmacokinetic properties of a single dose of pregabalin CR (330 mg) relative to a single dose of pregabalin IR (300 mg); (2) to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of a single dose of pregabalin CR administered fasted relative to a single dose of pregabalin CR administered immediately after food; and (3) to determine the safety and tolerability of single-dose administration of pregabalin CR and IR with and without food. METHODS: The effect of food on the pharmacokinetic properties of pregabalin CR was determined in five phase I, open-label, single-dose, crossover studies (24-28 participants/study). Caloric and fat content of meals were varied and treatments were administered in the morning, at midday, or in the evening. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from plasma concentration-time data using standard noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were monitored throughout all studies. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight healthy participants (19-54 years of age) received pregabalin. Peak plasma concentrations (C max) were lower for CR than the respective pregabalin IR doses, and time to C max occurred later. When pregabalin CR was administered with food at midday or in the evening, total exposures [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinite time (AUC∞)] were equivalent for pregabalin CR and IR formulations regardless of fat or caloric content. When pregabalin CR was administered with an 800-1,000 calorie medium-fat breakfast, AUC∞ was equivalent for pregabalin CR and IR. Bioequivalence criteria for comparison of pregabalin CR after a low- or medium-calorie breakfast relative to pregabalin IR were not met; however, bioavailability of the pregabalin CR vs. IR formulation was relatively high (75-86 %). When pregabalin CR was administered fasted, the AUC∞ was 70-78 % of the AUC∞ of pregabalin CR administered with food and bioequivalence criteria were not met. Additionally, the AUC∞ of the pregabalin CR formulation administered fasted was 62-69 % of that of pregabalin IR administered fasted and bioequivalence criteria were not met. Single-dose pregabalin CR and IR were well tolerated in all studies, with no serious or severe adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Time of day of administration and the fat and caloric content of the accompanying meal had minimal overall effect on the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability of the pregabalin CR formulation.

Pregabalin controlled-release pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: analysis of four multiple-dose randomized clinical pharmacology studies.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin (Lyrica(®)) is approved as an immediate-release (IR) formulation for administration twice (BID) or three times (TID) a day depending on indication. Once daily (QD) dosing may be appropriate for ease of clinical use and patient convenience. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis were: (1) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of pregabalin controlled-release (CR) administered with food relative to the pregabalin IR formulation administered fasted; (2) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a two-tablet dose of pregabalin CR compared with the equivalent one-tablet dose of pregabalin CR; and (3) to determine the safety and tolerability of multiple-dose administration of pregabalin CR and IR. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic properties of pregabalin CR were determined in four phase I, open-label, multiple-dose crossover studies (18-24 participants/study). Pregabalin CR (82.5, 165, 330 or 660 mg/day) administered QD was compared with pregabalin IR (75, 150, 300 or 600 mg/day, respectively) administered either BID or TID. Blood samples were collected up to 24 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from plasma concentration-time data using standard noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were monitored throughout all studies. RESULTS: Eight-four healthy participants (19-55 years of age) received pregabalin. For all pregabalin CR doses, total exposure was equivalent to the corresponding pregabalin IR dose. Relative bioavailability of pregabalin CR was 93-97 % of pregabalin IR, and bioequivalence criteria with respect to the 24-h steady-state exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC24]) were met. Administration of a two-tablet dose of pregabalin CR was bioequivalent to one-tablet pregabalin CR. The relative bioavailability of two-tablet pregabalin CR was 97-102 % of one-tablet pregabalin CR, and bioequivalence criteria with respect to AUC24 and peak plasma concentrations were met. Pregabalin CR pharmacokinetic parameters were dose proportional following administration of 82.5-660 mg/day pregabalin CR. Pregabalin was well tolerated across studies, with no serious or severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Total daily exposure with multiple-dose pregabalin CR is equivalent to the corresponding pregabalin IR dose.

Once daily controlled-release pregabalin in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: a phase III, double-blind, randomized withdrawal, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Safety and efficacy of a once daily controlled-released (CR) formulation of pregabalin was evaluated in patients with fibromyalgia using a placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal design. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter study included 6 week single-blind pregabalin CR treatment followed by 13 week double-blind treatment with placebo or pregabalin CR. The starting dose of 165 mg/day was escalated during the first 3 weeks, up to 495 mg/day based on efficacy and tolerability. Patients with ≥50% reduction in average daily pain score at the end of the single-blind phase were randomized to continue pregabalin CR at the optimized dose (330-495 mg/day) or to placebo. The primary endpoint was time to loss of therapeutic response (LTR), defined as <30% pain reduction relative to single-blind baseline or discontinuation owing to lack of efficacy or adverse event (AE). Secondary endpoints included measures of pain severity, global assessment, functional status, tiredness/fatigue, and sleep. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01271933. RESULTS: A total of 441 patients entered the single-blind phase, and 63 were randomized to pregabalin CR and 58 to placebo. The median time to LTR (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was significantly longer in the pregabalin CR group than placebo (58 vs. 22 days, p = 0.02). By trial end, 34/63 (54.0%) pregabalin CR and 41/58 (70.7%) placebo patients experienced LTR. Significantly more patients reported 'benefit from treatment' (Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue Scale) in the pregabalin CR group; no other secondary endpoints were statistically significant. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity (most frequent: dizziness, somnolence). The percentage of pregabalin CR patients discontinuing because of AEs was 12.2% and 4.8% in the single-blind and double-blind phases, respectively (placebo, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Time to LTR was significantly longer with pregabalin CR versus placebo in fibromyalgia patients who initially showed improvement with pregabalin CR, indicating maintenance of response. Pregabalin CR was well tolerated in most patients. Generalizability may be limited by study duration and selective population.

A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin for the treatment of central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Patients with chronic, below-level, neuropathic pain due to SCI were randomized to receive 150 to 600 mg/d pregabalin (n = 108) or matching placebo (n = 112) for 17 weeks. Pain was classified in relation to the neurologic level of injury, defined as the most caudal spinal cord segment with normal sensory and motor function, as above, at, or below level. The primary outcome measure was duration-adjusted average change in pain. Key secondary outcome measures included the change in mean pain score from baseline to end point, the percentage of patients with ≥30% reduction in mean pain score at end point, patient global impression of change scores at end point, and the change in mean pain-related sleep interference score from baseline to end point. Additional outcome measures included the medical outcomes study-sleep scale and the Hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Pregabalin treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements over placebo for all primary and key secondary outcome measures. Significant pain improvement was evident as early as week 1 and was sustained throughout the treatment period. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. Somnolence and dizziness were most frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pregabalin is effective and well tolerated in patients with neuropathic pain due to SCI. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides class I evidence that pregabalin, 150 to 600 mg/d, is effective in reducing duration-adjusted average change in pain compared with baseline in patients with SCI over a 16-week period (p = 0.003, 95% confidence interval = -0.98, -0.20).

Kinetics and EEG effects of midazolam during and after 1-minute, 1-hour, and 3-hour intravenous infusions.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the kinetics and dynamics of midazolam when administered by three different infusion schemes, using electroencephalography to measure pharmacodynamic effects. In a three-way crossover study, 8 volunteers received midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) by constant-rate intravenous infusion. The durations of midazolam infusions for the three trials were 1 minute, 1 hour, and 3 hours. Plasma midazolam concentrations and electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the 13- to 30-Hz range were monitored for 24 hours. Based on separate analysis of each subject-trial, mean values for volume of distribution and distribution or elimination half-life did not significantly vary. Central compartment volume and clearance differed among the three midazolam infusion trials; however, the magnitude of change was small. EEG activity in the 13- to 30-Hz range significantly increased for all three midazolam infusion trials. Plots of midazolam plasma concentration versus pharmacodynamic EEG effect for the 1-hour and 3-hour infusion trials did not reveal evidence of either counterclockwise or clockwise hysteresis. Plots from the 1-minute infusion trial demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an equilibration effect-site delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect-site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic EEG effect via the sigmoid E(max) model. Analysis of all three infusion trials together yielded the following mean estimates: maximum EEG effect, 16.3% over baseline; 50% maximum effective concentration, 31 ng/mL; and an apparent rate constant for drug disappearance from the effect compartment which approached infinity. Despite the delay in effect onset during the 1-minute midazolam infusion, midazolam infusions in duration of up to 3 hours produce CNS sedation without evidence of tolerance.