Ultra-deep amplicon sequencing indicates absence of low-grade mosaicism with normal cells in patients with type-1 NF1 deletions.

Different types of large NF1 deletion are distinguishable by breakpoint location and potentially also by the frequency of mosaicism with normal cells lacking the deletion. However, low-grade mosaicism with fewer than 10% normal cells has not yet been excluded for all NF1 deletion types since it is impossible to assess by the standard techniques used to identify such deletions, including MLPA and array analysis. Here, we used ultra-deep amplicon sequencing to investigate the presence of normal cells in the blood of 20 patients with type-1 NF1 deletions lacking mosaicism according to MLPA. The ultra-deep sequencing entailed the screening of 96 amplicons for heterozygous SNVs located within the NF1 deletion region. DNA samples from three previously identified patients with type-2 NF1 deletions and low-grade mosaicism with normal cells as determined by FISH or microsatellite marker analysis were used to validate our methodology. In these type-2 NF1 deletion samples, proportions of 5.3%, 6.6% and 15.0% normal cells, respectively, were detected by ultra-deep amplicon sequencing. However, using this highly sensitive method, none of the 20 patients with type-1 NF1 deletions included in our analysis exhibited low-grade mosaicism with normal cells in blood, thereby supporting the view that the vast majority of type-1 deletions are germline deletions.

Phenotypic and genotypic overlap between mosaic NF2 and schwannomatosis in patients with multiple non-intradermal schwannomas.

Schwannomatosis and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are both characterized by the development of multiple schwannomas but represent different genetic entities. Whereas NF2 is caused by mutations of the NF2 gene, schwannomatosis is associated with germline mutations of SMARCB1 or LZTR1. Here, we studied 15 sporadic patients with multiple non-intradermal schwannomas, but lacking vestibular schwannomas and ophthalmological abnormalities, who fulfilled the clinical diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis. None of them harboured germline NF2 or SMARCB1 mutations as determined by the analysis of blood samples but seven had germline LZTR1 variants predicted to be pathogenic. At least two independent schwannomas from each patient were subjected to NF2 mutation testing. In five of the 15 patients, identical somatic NF2 mutations were identified (33%). If only those patients without germline LZTR1 variants are considered (n = 8), three of them (37.5%) had mosaic NF2 as concluded from identical NF2 mutations identified in independent schwannomas from the same patient. These findings imply that a sizeable proportion of patients who fulfil the diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis, are actually examples of mosaic NF2. Hence, the molecular characterization of tumours in patients with a clinical diagnosis of schwannomatosis is very important. Remarkably, two of the patients with germline LZTR1 variants also had identical NF2 mutations in independent schwannomas from each patient which renders differential diagnosis of LZTR1-associated schwannomatosis versus mosaic NF2 in these patients very difficult.