No evidence of stimulation of human tumor cell proliferation by a standardized aqueous mistletoe extract in vitro.

The in vitro antiproliferative or stimulatory activity of an aqueous mistletoe extract (AME) with a defined content of bioactive mistletoe lectin (ML) was investigated in 6 human tumor cell lines, including two melanomas and leiomyosarcomas, each of which had previously been reported to show evidence of growth stimulation if treated with low concentrations of isolated ML. The effects of AME were compared to that of the standard cytotoxic agent adriamycin (ADR) using the well established propidium iodide and sulforhodamin B proliferation assays. The AME concentrations used ranged from 0.5 pg to 5 ng (0.82 fMol-85 pM) bioactive ML/ml in melanoma (HT-144, SK-MEL-28) and leiomyosarcoma (SK-MLS-1, S-UT-1B) cell lines and from 0.1-100 ng ML/ml (1.7 pM-1.7 nM) in MCF-7 breast cancer and SW620 colon carcinoma cell lines, respectively. The influence of AME on cell growth was determined at various time-points from 24 hours to 6 days of exposure. We found a time- and cell line-dependent inhibition of tumor cell growth, but no reproducible stimulation of tumor cell proliferation. Inhibitory concentrations 50% (IC50) for e.g. the SK-MEL-28 melanoma cell line, decreased from 4.1 ng ML/ml at 24 hours to 0.16 ng ML/ml at 72 hours and 0.18 ng ML/ml at 5 days. Our data clearly demonstrate that, by applying scientifically valid methods and procedures, the standardized AME did not stimulate tumor cell proliferation but showed time- and concentration-dependent antiproliferative effects.

Antiproliferative activity of an aqueous mistletoe extract in human tumor cell lines and xenografts in vitro.

The in vitro antiproliferative activity of an aqueous mistletoe extract (AME) with a defined content of bioactive mistletoe lectin (ML) was tested in 25 human tumor cell lines, including 20 solid and 5 hematological malignancies and 47 human tumor xenografts. The antiproliferative activity of AME was compared to that of the standard cytotoxic agent doxorubicin (CAS 23214-92-8, adriamycin, ADR) using the sulforhodamin B, propidium iodide and soft agar colony forming assays, respectively. AME was highly cytotoxic in solid human tumors with mean IC70 values in the range of 0.17-1 ng ML/ml (2.8-17 pmol bioactive ML). On a molar basis, AME was 3 to 4 logs more potent than ADR and showed differential cytotoxicity towards tumors of the breast, small cell and non-small cell lung, prostate and renal cell cancers. AME was also highly active in hematological malignancies with steep dose response curves resulting in mean IC70 values of 0.12 ng ML/ml (2 pmol). The acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line HL-60 was the most sensitive, the histiocytic lymphoma cell line U937 the most resistant hematological malignancy. It is important to stress that AME did not induce a biologically relevant increase of cell proliferation in any of the tumor cell lines tested. Our data suggest that AME has in vitro antitumor profiles similar to those of classical anticancer agents. Clear dose-response relationships were found in all of the performed experiments and interesting differential cytotoxicity patterns were observed. Experiments with sensitive tumor types identified in these in vitro studies are currently ongoing in order to demonstrate the anticancer activity of AME in different animal tumor models.

Anticancer activity of an aqueous mistletoe extract (AME) in syngeneic murine tumor models.

Mistletoe extracts have been used for decades for non-specific stimulation of the immune system in cancer therapy. Mistletoe lectins (ML) have been identified as the active principle with cytotoxic and immunomodulatory potencies. In the present in vivo experiments, the anticancer effects of an aqueous mistletoe extract (AME) were investigated in different subcutaneously growing syngeneic murine tumors such as Renca renal cell carcinoma, C8 colon 38 carcinoma, F9 testicular carcinoma, B16 melanoma and Lewis lung carcinoma. The animals used were immunocompetent mice of different strains (C57BL/6, BALB/c), depending on the type of tumor tested. After tumor transplantation, the mice were treated with AME at dose levels corresponding to 0, 0.3, 3, 30 or 300 ng ML/kg/d by the i.p. or s.c. route for a maximum of 4 consecutive weeks. The tumor volume was determined by serial caliper measurements and expressed relative to controls. Significant tumor growth inhibition was observed with the Renca , C8 colon 38 and F9 testicular carcinomas at 30 and 300 ng ML/kg/d. These findings were confirmed in independent repeat experiments. No inhibitory effects were seen with the Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma under the conditions described above. In conclusion, AME showed in vivo anticancer activity in different transplantable syngeneic murine tumor models following repeated parenteral treatment. In view of the low dose levels used, the effects are most likely due to the immunostimulatory rather than to the cytotoxic potencies of AME.