Factors affecting duration of inability to work after intramedullary stabilization of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.

BACKGROUND: Duration of inability to work (DIW) after displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCF) is an important clinical and socioeconomic treatment outcome. However, evidence on DIW after DMCF intramedullary stabilization (IMS) is still limited. We aimed to examine DIW and identify medical and socioeconomic predictors with direct or indirect impact on DIW after IMS of DMCF. HYPOTHESIS: Socioeconomic predictors can explain the unique proportion of the DIW variance after IMS of DMCF above the variance explained by medical predictors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort unicentric design, we included patients surgically treated with IMS after DMCF from 2009-2022 with employment status subject to compulsory social security contributions, and without major postoperative complications, in one level II trauma center in Germany. In total, we tested the impact of 17 different medical (i.e., smoking, body mass index [BMI], operative duration, etc.) and socioeconomic predictors (i.e., health insurance type, physical workload, etc.) on DIW. Statistics included multiple regression and path analyses. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients met the eligibility criteria, with DIW 35.1±31.1days. Operative duration, physical workload, and physical therapy prolonged the DIW (p<0.001). In contrast, enrollment in private health insurance reduced the DIW (p<0.05). Furthermore, the effect of BMI and fracture complexity on DIW was fully mediated by operative duration. The model explained 43% of the DIW variance. DISCUSSION: Socioeconomic factors were found to directly predict the DIW, even after controlling for medical predictors, which confirmed our research question. This is in line with previous findings and highlights the relevance of socioeconomic predictors in this context. We believe that the proposed model can serve surgeons and patients as an orientation guide to estimate the DIW after IMS of DMCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV - retrospective observational cohort study with no control group.

Surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in centenarians: prevalence and outcomes based on a German multicenter study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the survival rate after proximal femoral fracture insult and identify the subgroup of centenarians with a high risk. METHODS: Records of patients (≥ 65 years) who underwent surgery for PFF between 2006 and 2020 were retrieved from the electronic databases of three hospitals. Overall, 22 demographic, perioperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed for all patients > 99 years of age. The effect of anemia, time to surgery, surgical procedure, place of residence, and dementia on complications and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 85 patients (women n = 71; men n = 14; median age, 100 years; range 100-106 years). Over the study period, the prevalence of centenarians with PFF increased (0.94%). The overall complication rate was 28% (in-hospital death, n = 16; infection, n = 1; hematoma, n = 1; implant failure, n = 1; cardiac decompensation, n = 3; pneumonia with delirium, n = 1; urinary tract infection, n = 1). The 30-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year mortality rates for the study group were 27.1%, 42.4%, 55.3%, and 61.2%, respectively. Median survival was 150 days (range 1-1942 days). Patients with dementia (n = 47) had a shorter survival time than patients without dementia (n = 38) (hazard ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.04, 2.95). Preoperative anemia, time to surgery, or necessary surgical procedure had no impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of centenarians undergoing surgery for PFF is increasing. In-hospital mortality is high, and dementia is a risk factor impacting survival. The rates of surgical revision and general complications are low, and the chosen predictors had no significant impact on these outcomes. The survival rate after discharge from hospital seems to be comparable to the estimated survival rate of uninjured centenarians.

Injuries in supercross - Evaluation of trauma during a two-day international indoor motocross event.

INTRODUCTION: Supercross is characterized by fast and skillful movements, with high concentration being required on an indoor competition circuit, due to the demanding jumps and short distances to the next obstacle. The injuries can turn out to be diverse, including polytraumatization. This paper aims to evaluate the accidents and possible injuries in a single Supercross competition. To what extent is the presence of medical staff required? METHODS: During the 17th International Supercross Event in Chemnitz, 93 participants started in 5 classes. Severe injuries were treated at the track, through the emergency department and hospital stay to their discharge. RESULTS: Overall 5 participants (4.65%) had to be admitted to the clinic. CONCLUSION: Injuries from risky jumps at relatively high speed can range from minor contusions to fractures and serious injuries. The permanent readiness of medical staff and emergency doctors at the site is therefore justified and required. The variety of injuries in a Supercross event can affect the head and face, the upper- and lower extremities, thoracal- and abdominal traumas and especially the spine. In addition, a special training concept in terms of preventive measures to prevent falls would be desirable.

Complementary medicine in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: a cross-sectional survey on usage and needs.

OBJECTIVES: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is frequently used in Western countries within general medicine and internal medicine. Information on the use in orthopaedic and trauma surgery is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate usage and needs regarding CAM for these patients. DESIGN: Prospective paper-based, pseudoanonymous, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: From August to December 2018, a questionnaire composed of 17 questions was distributed to all eligible patients. PARTICIPANTS: In-house patients in orthopaedic and trauma surgery at a high-volume medical centre in Germany. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Previous or current usage of CAM, interest and requests towards CAM as well as communication about CAM. RESULTS: Overall, 457 orthopaedic and trauma surgical patients took part in the survey. They were on average 52 years old and 54% were male. Most of the patients were admitted due to bone fractures and most underwent operative therapy. Previous or current CAM usage was stated by 76% and 30% of patients, respectively. Most of the patients stated to be interested in usage of CAM and demanded for more clinical usage of CAM and reliable information about CAM. More than 90% of patients did not discuss CAM interest or usage with their treating physicians. Patients stated that physicians should have knowledge about CAM. They wish to be treated in a holistic manner and want to strengthen self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Usage of CAM of patients in orthopaedic and trauma surgery appears to be high. Only a few patients discuss their interest and usage of CAM with their treating physician. Therefore, surgeons should ask their patients about CAM and should consider evidence-based CAM approaches for complementary treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS0001544.