Improved Transcranial Doppler Waveform Analysis for Intracranial Hypertension Assessment in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a noninvasive bedside tool for cerebral hemodynamic assessments in multiple clinical scenarios. TCD, by means of measuring systolic and diastolic blood velocities, allows the calculation of the pulsatility index (PI), a parameter that is correlated with intracranial pressure (ICP). Nevertheless, the predictive value of the PI for raised ICP appears to be low, as it is subjected to several, often confounding, factors not related to ICP. Recently, the pulsatile apparent resistance (PaR) index was developed as a PI corrected for arterial blood pressure, reducing some of the confounding factors influencing PI. This study compares the predictive value of PaR versus PI for intracranial hypertension (IH) (ICP > 20 mm Hg) in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to the neurocritical care unit who required invasive ICP monitoring were included prospectively within 5 days of admission. TCD measurements were performed in both middle cerebral arteries, allowing calculations of the PI and PaR. The optimal cutoff, discriminative power of these parameters for ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg, was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: In total, 93 patients were included. A total of 20 (22%) patients experienced IH during the recording sessions. The discriminative power was low for PI (AUC 0.63) but slightly higher for PaR (AUC 0.77). Nonparametric analysis indicated significant difference for PaR when comparing patients with (median 0.169) and without IH (median - 0.052, p = 0.001), whereas PI medians for patients with and without IH were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively (p = 0.041). Regarding subanalyses, the discriminative power of these parameters increased after exclusion of patients who had undergone a neurosurgical procedure. This was especially true for the PaR (AUC 0.89) and PI (AUC 0.72). Among these patients, a PaR cutoff value of - 0.023 had 100% sensitivity and 52.9% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, discriminative power of the PaR for discriminating IH was superior to the PI. The PaR seems to be a reliable noninvasive parameter for detecting IH. Further studies are warranted to define its clinical application, especially in aiding neurosurgical decision making, following up in intensive care units, and defining its ability to indicate responses according to the therapies administered.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Perioperative Cerebral and Hemodynamic Monitoring Methods during Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes between different strategies of perioperative cerebral and hemodynamic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. METHODS: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and prospectively registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021241891). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to describe the methodological quality of the studies and certainty of the evidence. The primary outcome was 30-day stroke rate. Secondary outcomes measures are 30-day ipsilateral stroke, 30-day mortality, shunt rate, and complication rates. RESULTS: The search identified 3,460 articles. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three prospective observational studies and seven registries were included, reporting on 236,983 patients. The overall pooled 30-day stroke rate is 1.8% (95% CI 1.4-2.2%), ranging from 0 to 12.6%. In RCT's the pooled 30-day stroke rate is 2.7% (95% CI 1.6-3.7%) compared to 1.3% (95% CI 0.8-1.8%) in the registries. The overall stroke risk decreased from 3.7% before the year 2000 to 1.6% after 2000. No significant differences could be identified between different monitoring and shunting strategies, although a trend to higher stroke rates in routine no shunting arms of RCTs was observed. Overall, 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction and nerve injury rates are 0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.8), 0.8% (95% CI 0.6-1.0) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-2.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences between the compared shunting and monitoring strategies are found. However, routine no shunting is not recommended. The available data are too limited to prefer 1 method of neuromonitoring over another method when selective shunting is applied.

Age corrected changes in intracranial hemodynamics after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is a frequently used method to monitor brain perfusion during and following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Our aim was to define the normally occurring changes of intracranial hemodynamics in patients undergoing CEA measuring recently developed TCD parameters. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients undergoing CEA were evaluated pre- and postoperatively from day 0 to day 3 measuring middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAFV). The following parameters were analyzed: the first systolic peak (Sys1), the second systolic peak (Sys2) and diastolic flow velocity at a fixed time after heartbeat onset (Dias@560). These parameters linearly decrease with age and were, therefore, transformed to Z-scores. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen patients were included with a mean age of 70.8 years. Most patients were male (71%). Compared to preoperatively, the Z-scores of Sys1 and Sys2 were larger on postoperative day 3: +1.12 standard deviation (SD) or 16.0 cm/s (CI: 0.93 to 1.32; P<0.001) and +0.55 SD or 7.8 cm/s (CI: 0.35 to 0.74; P<0.001), respectively. The Z-score for Dias@560 was smaller than preoperatively: -0.23 SD or -1.9 cm/s (CI: -0.41 to -0.05, P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Under normal circumstances Sys1 profits more from CEA than Sys2, whilst diastolic flow velocity decreases. This indicates a return to normal arteriolar vascular resistance. Carefully describing normal changes in MCAFV, may in future enable discrimination of abnormalities, such as hyperperfusion syndrome.

Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Patients Improves Systolic but not Diastolic Middle Cerebral Artery Flow Velocity.

To investigate the effects of fluid resuscitation on cerebral hemodynamics in sepsis, the following set of transcranial Doppler (TCD) parameters was used: maximal change in flow velocity (FV) during stroke onset (acc), maximal FV during first (sys1) or second (sys2) phase of systole and mean diastolic FV (dias@560). We aim to evaluate changes in cerebral hemodynamics that result from (i) sepsis and (ii) adequate fluid resuscitation in critically ill septic patients. In the majority of 16 septic patients sys2 was initially absent but reappeared during the period of fluid resuscitation; whereas sys2 absence was never seen in healthy controls. Second, adequate fluid resuscitation resulted in a significant increase of the systolic FV components (acc, sys1, sys2 and systolic blood pressure); whereas the diastolic components (dias@560 and diastolic blood pressure) remained unchanged. Sys2 absence and reappearance in sepsis suggests that TCD could become a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring.

Improved parameterization of the transcranial Doppler signal.

The great potential of transcranial Doppler (TCD) as a tool for neuromonitoring is limited by the current parameterization of the signal. This article proposes a set of new parameters that more accurately represents the shape of the waveform and eliminates a number of confounding factors. This set of parameters was tested in 227 patients with ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis and compared with 31 normal subjects recruited at our laboratory. From the TCD waveform, we calculated on a beat-to-beat basis the maximal change in flow velocity at stroke onset (acceleration or acc), the maximal flow velocity during the first 100 ms of systole (sys1) and the maximal flow velocity in the remaining part of systole (sys2). All data were normalized relative to the mean diastolic flow velocity over an interval ranging from 520 till 600 ms after stroke onset (dias@560). For the group with carotid stenosis compared with the normal controls the average ± SD for acc (20.2 ± 9.5 vs. 20.2 ± 6.7; p = 0.98) and sys1 (1.82 ± 0.38 vs. 1.77 ± 0.56; p = 0.35) did not differ significantly. The average ±SD for sys2 (1.94 ± 0.33 vs. 1.50 ± 0.12; p < 0.001), however, was significantly higher in the group with carotid stenosis than in the group of normal subjects. The difference between sys1 and sys2 ("sys1-sys2") was lower in the patient group than in controls (-0.12 ± 0.16 vs. 0.27 ± 0.22; p < 0.001). For the acc, there was a significantly higher variance in the group with stenosis than without (p < 0.001). Of the old parameters, the beat-to-beat mean (37.0 ± 13.1 vs. 41.3 ± 15.9; p = 0.17) and the pulsatility index (PI; 1.00 ± 0.26 vs. 0.91 ± 0.23; p = 0.06) were not significantly different between groups. Graphed together the acc and "sys1-sys2" parameters allowed a clear demarcation of both groups whereas in a graph of the old parameters mean and PI both groups overlapped considerably. In conclusion, the proposed set of new parameters not only has theoretical and practical benefits but also has excellent discriminative power in a group of carotid patients compared with normal controls.

Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Whether surgery is beneficial for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is controversial. Better methods of identifying patients who are likely to develop stroke would improve the risk-benefit ratio for carotid endarterectomy. We aimed to investigate whether detection of asymptomatic embolic signals by use of transcranial doppler (TCD) could predict stroke risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: The Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES) was a prospective observational study in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 70% from 26 centres worldwide. To detect the presence of embolic signals, patients had two 1 h TCD recordings from the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery at baseline and one 1 h recording at 6, 12, and 18 months. Patients were followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral stroke and transient ischaemic attack. All recordings were analysed centrally by investigators masked to patient identity. FINDINGS: 482 patients were recruited, of whom 467 had evaluable recordings. Embolic signals were present in 77 of 467 patients at baseline. The hazard ratio for the risk of ipsilateral stroke and transient ischaemic attack from baseline to 2 years in patients with embolic signals compared with those without was 2.54 (95% CI 1.20-5.36; p=0.015). For ipsilateral stroke alone, the hazard ratio was 5.57 (1.61-19.32; p=0.007). The absolute annual risk of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischaemic attack between baseline and 2 years was 7.13% in patients with embolic signals and 3.04% in those without, and for ipsilateral stroke was 3.62% in patients with embolic signals and 0.70% in those without. The hazard ratio for the risk of ipsilateral stroke and transient ischaemic attack for patients who had embolic signals on the recording preceding the next 6-month follow-up compared with those who did not was 2.63 (95% CI 1.01-6.88; p=0.049), and for ipsilateral stroke alone the hazard ratio was 6.37 (1.59-25.57; p=0.009). Controlling for antiplatelet therapy, degree of stenosis, and other risk factors did not alter the results. INTERPRETATION: Detection of asymptomatic embolisation on TCD can be used to identify patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis who are at a higher risk of stroke and transient ischaemic attack, and also those with a low absolute stroke risk. Assessment of the presence of embolic signals on TCD might be useful in the selection of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis who are likely to benefit from endarterectomy. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation.