Bacterial Oncotraits Rather than Spatial Organization Are Associated with Dysplasia in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonic bacterial biofilms are frequently present in ulcerative colitis [UC] and may increase dysplasia risk through pathogens expressing oncotraits. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine [1] the association of oncotraits and longitudinal biofilm presence with dysplasia risk in UC, and [2] the relation of bacterial composition with biofilms and dysplasia risk. METHODS: Faeces and left- and right-sided colonic biopsies were collected from 80 UC patients and 35 controls. Oncotraits [FadA of Fusobacterium, BFT of Bacteroides fragilis, colibactin [ClbB] and Intimin [Eae] of Escherichia coli] were assessed in faecal DNA with multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR]. Biopsies were screened for biofilms [n = 873] with 16S rRNA fluorescent in situ hybridiation. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing [n = 265], and ki67-immunohistochemistry were performed. Associations were determined with a mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: Biofilms were highly prevalent in UC patients [90.8%] with a median persistence of 3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2-5 years). Biofilm-positive biopsies showed increased epithelial hypertrophy [p = 0.025] and a reduced Shannon diversity independent of disease status [p = 0.015], but were not significantly associated with dysplasia in UC: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-3.40. In contrast, ClbB independently associated with dysplasia [aOR 7.16, 95% CI 1.75-29.28], and FadA and Fusobacteriales were associated with a decreased dysplasia risk in UC [aOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83, p <0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilms are a hallmark of UC; however, because of their high prevalence are a poor biomarker for dysplasia. In contrast, colibactin presence and FadA absence independently associate with dysplasia in UC and might therefore be valuable biomarkers for future risk stratification and intervention strategies.

Changes in body weight and serum liver tests associated with parenteral nutrition compared with no parenteral nutrition in patients with acute myeloid leukemia during remission induction treatment.

PURPOSE: Differences in body weight changes and serum liver tests (LTs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) versus no PN during remission induction (RI) treatment were assessed. METHODS: Retrospectively, differences in body weight changes and serum LTs in AML patients (n = 213) who received PN versus no PN during RI treatment in one of three Dutch hospitals between 2004 and 2015 were assessed. Weekly body weight and serum LT registrations were collected from medical records. Patients' body weight changes were compared between the hospitals where PN is applied upon first indication of inadequate oral intake (PN hospitals) and the hospital where use of PN is limited to severe cases only (no-PN hospital) using repeated measures mixed model analysis. Differences in severity of serum LT elevations, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, were assessed between patients who did and did not receive PN using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with patients of the PN hospitals, patients of the no-PN hospital experienced significantly more body weight loss during RI treatment (between-group difference 7.2%, 95% CI 4.0-10.3%). Furthermore, PN was associated with transient mild to moderate elevations of liver enzymes, but not with raised median total bilirubin levels nor with occurrence of CTCAE grade 3-4 LT elevations. CONCLUSION: Frequent compared with exceptional use of PN in AML patients during RI treatment better preserved body weight, without clinically relevant (CTCAE grade 3-4) elevations in serum LTs.