Development and Validation of Measurement Traceability for In Situ Immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays for protein analytes measured in situ support a $2 billion laboratory testing industry that suffers from significant interlaboratory disparities, affecting patient treatment. The root cause is that immunohistochemical testing lacks the generally accepted tools for analytic standardization, including reference standards and traceable units of measure. Until now, the creation of these tools has represented an insoluble technical hurdle. METHODS: We address the need with a new concept in metrology-that is, linked traceability. Rather than calculating analyte concentration directly, which has proven too variable, we calculate concentration by measuring an attached fluorescein, traceable to NIST Standard Reference Material 1934, a fluorescein standard. RESULTS: For validation, newly developed estrogen receptor (ER) calibrators were deployed in tandem with an array of 80 breast cancer tissue sections in a national external quality assessment program. Laboratory performance was assessed using both the ER standards and the tissue array. Similar to previous studies, the tissue array revealed substantial discrepancies in ER test results among the participating laboratories. The new ER calibrators revealed a broad range of analytic sensitivity, with the lower limits of detection ranging from 7310 to 74 790 molecules of ER. The data demonstrate, for the first time, that the variable test results correlate with analytic sensitivity, which can now be measured quantitatively. CONCLUSIONS: The reference standard enables precise interlaboratory alignment of immunohistochemistry test sensitivity for measuring cellular proteins in situ. The introduction of a reference standard and traceable units of measure for protein expression marks an important milestone.

Selecting an Optimal Positive IHC Control for Verifying Antigen Retrieval.

Positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) controls are intended to detect problems in both immunostaining and heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER). However, it is not known what features in a control are important for verifying HIER. Contrary to expectation, the fact that a tissue is formalin-fixed does not necessarily render it suitable in verifying proper HIER. Some tissue controls, for some immunostains, strongly stain even without HIER. Consequently, the control may verify the immunostain but provide little or no information regarding the HIER step. To sort this out, we used formalin-fixed peptide epitopes, a model that provides for precise definition of analyte concentration, epitope composition, and degree of fixation. Our data demonstrate that formalin fixation generates a variable level of protein epitope masking, depending on the epitope recognized by the primary antibody. Some epitopes are highly masked while others hardly at all. Furthermore, the ability of amino acids in the epitope to react with formaldehyde can, at least in part, account for this variability. Most important, we demonstrate the importance of selecting a positive control with a low or intermediate analyte concentration (relative to the immunostain's analytic sensitivity). High analyte concentrations can be insensitive in verifying the HIER step.

Quantitative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Laboratory Performance by Measuring Analytic Response Curves and Limits of Detection.

CONTEXT: - Numerous studies highlight interlaboratory performance variability in diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Despite substantial improvements over the years, the inability to quantitatively and objectively assess immunostain sensitivity complicates interlaboratory standardization. OBJECTIVE: - To quantitatively and objectively assess the sensitivity of the immunohistochemical stains for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) across IHC laboratories in a proficiency testing format. We measure sensitivity with parameters that are new to the field of diagnostic IHC: analytic response curves and limits of detection. DESIGN: - Thirty-nine diagnostic IHC laboratories stained a set of 3 slides, one each for HER2, ER, and PR. Each slide incorporated a positive tissue section and IHControls at 5 different concentrations. The IHControls comprise cell-sized clear microbeads coated with defined concentrations of analyte (HER2, ER, and/or PR). The laboratories identified the limits of detection and then mailed the slides for quantitative assessment. RESULTS: - Each commercial immunostain demonstrated a characteristic analytic response curve, reflecting strong reproducibility among IHC laboratories using the same automation and reagents prepared per current Good Manufacturing Practices. However, when comparing different commercial vendors (using different reagents), the data reveal up to 100-fold differences in analytic sensitivity. For proficiency testing purposes, quantitative assessment using analytic response curves was superior to subjective interpretation of limits of detection. CONCLUSIONS: - Assessment of IHC laboratory performance by quantitative measurement of analytic response curves is a powerful, objective tool for identifying outlier IHC laboratories. It uniquely evaluates immunostain performance across a range of defined analyte concentrations.

The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control.

Clinical Immunohistochemistry (IHC) laboratories face unique challenges in performing accurate and reproducible immunostains. Among these challenges is the use of homemade controls derived from pathological discard samples. Such positive controls have an unknown number of analyte molecules per cell (epitope density). It is unclear how the lack of defined analyte concentrations affects performance of the control. To address this question, we prepared positive IHC controls ( IHControls) for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR) with well-defined, homogeneous, and reproducible analyte concentrations. Using the IHControls, we examined the effect of analyte concentration on IHC control sensitivity. IHControls and conventional tissue controls were evaluated in a series of simulated primary antibody reagent degradation experiments. The data demonstrate that the ability of a positive IHC control to reveal reagent degradation depends on (1) the analyte concentration in the control and (2) where that concentration falls on the immunostain's analytic response curve. The most sensitive positive IHC controls have analyte concentrations within or close to the immunostain's concentration-dependent response range. Strongly staining positive controls having analyte concentrations on the analytic response curve plateau are less sensitive. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting positive IHC controls that are of intermediate (rather than strong) stain intensity.

Analytic Response Curves of Clinical Breast Cancer IHC Tests.

An important limitation in the field of immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the inability to correlate stain intensity with specific analyte concentrations. Clinical immunohistochemical tests are not described in terms of analytic response curves, namely, the analyte concentrations in a tissue sample at which an immunohistochemical stain (1) is first visible, (2) increases in proportion to the analyte concentration, and (3) ultimately approaches a maximum color intensity. Using a new immunostaining tool ( IHControls), we measured the analytic response curves of the major clinical immunohistochemical tests for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). The IHControls comprise the analytes HER-2, ER, and PR at approximately log concentration intervals across the range of biological expression, from 100 to 1,000,000 molecules per test microbead. We stained IHControls of various concentrations using instruments, reagents, and protocols from three major IHC vendors. Stain intensity at each analyte concentration was measured, thereby generating an analytic response curve. We learned that for HER-2 and PR, there is significant variability in test results between clinical kits for samples with analyte concentrations of approximately 104 molecules/microbead. We propose that the characterization of immunostains is an important step toward standardization.