Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.

Thresholds in notched-noise maskers (NN) and narrow-band maskers (NB) were measured for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subject pairs who were listening in a background of spectrally shaped broadband noise (SSBB). Consonant recognition was also measured in SSBB. SSBB was adjusted so that thresholds in that noise for each normal-hearing/hearing-impaired subject pair were equal. Threshold and signal-level differences between subject pairs were minimized with the addition of threshold-elevating SSBB, and the presence of a noise background for both groups provided a comparable listening environment for all subjects. At signal frequencies outside masker passbands, thresholds in NN and NB for hearing-impaired subjects were higher than for normal-hearing subjects, although threshold differences were much smaller than observed between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects without SSBB. No consistent differences in consonant recognition measured in SSBB were observed between groups. The pattern of results is comparable to that observed in a previous experiment [Dubno and Schaefer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2110-2121 (1992)] in which thresholds in NN and NB, and consonant recognition, for hearing-impaired listeners were compared to results obtained for normal-hearing subjects, but only normal-hearing subjects listened in SSBB. Using a modified power-law model of masking additivity, thresholds in combined-masker conditions were estimated. Masking effects for spectrally overlapping maskers were similar for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners and suggest that residual differences between subject groups are not due to the presence of an additional background noise.

Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.

Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition were determined for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using techniques that facilitate comparisons of performance among listeners whose absolute thresholds vary in magnitude and configuration. First, for each of six subjects with cochlear hearing loss, masked thresholds in notched noise and narrow-band-noise maskers were obtained and compared to results for three normal-hearing listeners whose thresholds were precisely matched to the impaired listeners' by masking with spectrally shaped broadband noise. Second, for hearing-impaired listeners and their masked normal-hearing controls, measurements of consonant recognition were obtained at several speech-presentation levels selected on the basis of articulation-index predictions to assure equal speech-spectrum audibility across listeners. The results suggest that frequency selectivity is poorer for hearing-impaired listeners than for masked normal-hearing listeners, even when thresholds among subjects are equated, but the deviation from normal frequency selectivity is smaller than estimated from comparisons with normal-hearing listeners in quiet. Critical ratios for hearing-impaired listeners are equivalent to normal. Although frequency selectivity is reduced, there is no consistent difference in consonant recognition between hearing-impaired subjects and masked normal-hearing subjects, when performance is assessed under conditions that assure equal speech-spectrum audibility across subjects.

Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.

When evaluating frequency selectivity, it is difficult to determine if the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners reflects abnormal cochlear function or normal, level-dependent changes in frequency selectivity. This experiment was designed to investigate the dependence of frequency-selectivity measures on threshold and signal level. Auditory-filter characteristics, critical ratios, forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves, and narrowband-noise masking patterns were obtained from normal-hearing listeners in quite and in the presence of broadband noise at five levels. These findings were then compared to previously obtained frequency-selectivity measurements for subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss whose absolute thresholds are comparable to the normal-hearing listeners' masked thresholds. The results suggest that frequency selectivity deterioriates as threshold increases for all subjects. However, the poor frequency selectivity exhibited by hearing-impaired listeners may not be explained entirely by the effects of threshold and signal level. Nevertheless, because frequency selectivity is poorer in the normal auditory system at higher stimulus levels, the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners may not be as large as previously suggested.

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.

Articulation index (AI) theory was used to evaluate stop-consonant recognition of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. From results reported in a companion article [Dubno et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 347-354 (1989)], a transfer function relating the AI to stop-consonant recognition was established, and a frequency importance function was determined for the nine stop-consonant-vowel syllables used as test stimuli. The calculations included the rms and peak levels of the speech that had been measured in 1/3 octave bands; the internal noise was estimated from the thresholds for each subject. The AI model was then used to predict performance for the hearing-impaired listeners. A majority of the AI predictions for the hearing-impaired subjects fell within +/- 2 standard deviations of the normal-hearing listeners' results. However, as observed in previous data, the AI tended to overestimate performance of the hearing-impaired listeners. The accuracy of the predictions decreased with the magnitude of high-frequency hearing loss. Thus, with the exception of performance for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss, the results suggest that poorer speech recognition among hearing-impaired listeners results from reduced audibility within critical spectral regions of the speech stimuli.

Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition.

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the utilization of short-term spectral cues for recognition of initial plosive consonants (/b,d,g/) by normal-hearing and by hearing-impaired listeners differing in audiometric configuration. Recognition scores were obtained for these consonants paired with three vowels (/a,i,u/) while systematically reducing the duration (300 to 10 ms) of the synthetic consonant-vowel syllables. Results from 10 normal-hearing and 15 hearing-impaired listeners suggest that audiometric configuration interacts in a complex manner with the identification of short-duration stimuli. For consonants paired with the vowels /a/ and /u/, performance deteriorated as the slope of the audiometric configuration increased. The one exception to this result was a subject who had significantly elevated pure-tone thresholds relative to the other hearing-impaired subjects. Despite the changes in the shape of the onset spectral cues imposed by hearing loss, with increasing duration, consonant recognition in the /a/ and /u/ context for most hearing-impaired subjects eventually approached that of the normal-hearing listeners. In contrast, scores for consonants paired with /i/ were poor for a majority of hearing-impaired listeners for stimuli of all durations.

Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesion.

Twenty subjects with abnormal auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and diagnosed brainstem lesion or disease were studied. Normal listeners were used as controls. The objective of the project was to examine the relationship of the particular ABR patterns exhibited by these subjects to the binaural masking level differences (MLD) and transbrainstem acoustic reflex (AR) patterns yielded by the same subjects. Patients whose ABR abnormalities commenced with brainstem potentials I, II, or III had small or no MLD and absent or abnormal AR. Patients whose ABR abnormalities commenced with brainstem potentials IV or V yielded normal MLD and AR behavior. Most important, these findings suggest that MLD size is influenced by activity which also contributes importantly to the development of the early auditory brainstem potentials.