Bed isolation in experimental flap studies in rats: a dispensable procedure.

Review of the literature regarding rodent experimental flap models reveals fundamental differences in applied surgical procedures. Although some authors isolate the flap from its wound bed, others do not. This study was planned to investigate to what extent the insertion of a silicone sheet affects physiological wound healing in experimental flap surgery. An extended epigastric adipocutaneous flap (6 × 10 cm) was raised in 16 male Lewis rats. In the control group (group C), flaps were immediately inset without any intervention. In the experimental group (group M), a silicone sheet barrier was placed between the flap and the wound bed. Mean flap survival area and flap perfusion were evaluated. Microvessel density was visualized by immunohistochemistry, and semiquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction addressed differential gene expression. All animals were investigated on postoperative day 5. Flap survival area and flap perfusion were found to be similar. Immunohistochemistry, however, demonstrated a significantly increased number of CD31-positive small vessels in group C. The insertion of the silicone sheet barrier (group M) was accompanied by a significantly enhanced expression of proinflammatory genes and a suppression of proangiogenic genes. Our results show that although the silicone membrane has no influence on the surgical outcome in terms of flap survival and perfusion, it does lead to significant molecular alterations in pathways involved in physiological wound healing. These alterations are artificially induced by the foreign body material and conceal the true driving forces of the healing process. As the latter might include relevant therapeutic targets to ameliorate surgical results, we regard wound bed isolation as a dispensable procedure in the study of rodent flap models.

Adipose derived stem cells protect skin flaps against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the treatment of ischemia- reperfusion injury have created an opportunity for plastic surgeons to apply these treatments to flaps and implanted tissues. We examined the capability of adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) to protect tissue against IRI using an extended inferior epigastric artery skin flap as a flap ischemia- reperfusion injury (IRI) model. METHODS: ADSCs were isolated from Lewis rats and cultured in vitro. Twenty- four rats were randomly divided into three groups. Group I was the sham group and did not undergo ischemic insult; rather, the flap was raised and immediately sutured back (non-ischemic control group). Group II (ischemia control) and group III (ADSCs treatment) underwent 3 h of ischemic insult. During reperfusion group III was treated by intravenous application of ADSCs and group II was left untreated. Five days postoperatively, flap survival and perfusion were assessed. Microvessel density was visualized by immunohistochemistry and semi- quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction addressed differential gene expression. RESULTS: Treatment with ADSCs significantly increased flap survival (p<0.001) and flap perfusion (p<0.001) when compared to the control group II. Microvessel- density in ADSCs treated group was not significantly increased in any group. No significant differences showed the comparison of the experimental group III and the sham operated control group I. ADSCs treatment (Group III) was accompanied by a significantly enhanced expression of pro-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory genes. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study demonstrates that ADSCs treatment significantly enhances skin flap survival in the aftermath of ischemia to an extent that almost equals surgical results without ischemia. This effect is accompanied with a pronounced and significant angiogenic response and an improved blood perfusion.

Extracorporeal shock wave treatment protects skin flaps against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Advances in the treatment of ischemia-reperfusion injury have created an opportunity for plastic surgeons to apply these treatments to flaps and implanted tissues. Using an extended inferior epigastric artery skin flap as a flap ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) model, we examined the capability of extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) to protect tissue against IRI in a rat flap model. Twenty-four rats were used and randomly divided into three groups (n=8 for each group). Group I was the sham group and did not undergo ischemic insult; rather, the flap was raised and immediately sutured back (non-ischemic control group). Group II (ischemia control) and Group III (ESWT) underwent 3h of ischemic insult. During reperfusion Group III was treated with ESWT and Group II was left untreated. Histological evaluation was made to investigate treatment induced tissue alterations. Survival areas were assessed at 5d postoperatively. Skin flap survival and perfusion improved significantly in the ischemic animals following ESWT (p<0.001, respectively). The tissue protecting effect of ESWT resulted in flap survival areas and perfusion data equal to non-ischemic, sham operated flaps. In line with the observation of better flap perfusion, tissue from ESWT-treated animals (Group III) revealed a significantly increased frequency of CD31-positive vessels compared to both the ischemic (Group II; p=0.003) and the non-ischemic, sham operated control (Group I; p<0.005) and an enhanced expression of pro-angiogenic genes. This was accompanied by a mild suppression of pro-inflammatory genes. Our study suggests that ESWT improves flap survival in IRI by promoting angiogenesis and inhibiting tissue inflammation. The study identifies ESWT as a low-cost and easy to use technique for surgical techniques that aim at reducing ischemia-reperfusion-induced tissue injury.