RESUMO
Background: Visual acuity and image stability are crucial for daily activities, particularly during head motion. The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and its suppression (VORS) support stable fixation of objects of interest. The VOR drives a reflexive eye movement to counter retinal slip of a stable target during head motion. In contrast, VORS inhibits this countermovement when the target stimulus is in motion. The VORS allows for object fixation when it aligns with the direction of the head's movement, or when an object within or outside the peripheral vision needs to be focused upon. Summary: Deficits of the VORS have been linked to age-related diseases such as balance deficits associated with an increased fall risk. Therefore, the accurate assessment of the VORS is of particular clinical relevance. However, current clinical assessment methods for VORS are mainly qualitative and not sufficiently standardised. Recent advances in digital health technology, such as smartphone-based videooculography, offer a promising alternative for assessing VORS in a more accessible, efficient, and quantitative manner. Moreover, integrating mobile eye-tracking technology with virtual reality environments allows for the implementation of controlled VORS assessments with different visual inputs. These assessment approaches allow the extraction of novel parameters with potential pathomechanistic and clinical relevance. Key Messages: We argue that researchers and clinicians can obtain a more nuanced understanding of this ocular stabilisation reflex and its associated pathologies by harnessing digital health technology for VORS assessment. Further research is warranted to explore the technologies' full potential and utility in clinical practice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disconjugate eye movements are essential for depth perception in frontal-eyed species, but their underlying neural substrates are largely unknown. Lesions in the midbrain can cause disconjugate eye movements. While vertically disconjugate eye movements have been linked to defective visuo-vestibular integration, the pathophysiology and neuroanatomy of horizontally disconjugate eye movements remains elusive. METHODS: A patient with a solitary focal midbrain lesion was examined using detailed clinical ocular motor assessments, binocular videooculography and diffusion-weighted MRI, which was co-registered to a high-resolution cytoarchitectonic MR-atlas. RESULTS: The patient exhibited both vertically and horizontally disconjugate eye alignment and nystagmus. Binocular videooculography showed a strong correlation of vertical and horizontal oscillations during fixation but not in darkness. Oscillation intensities and waveforms were modulated by fixation, illumination, and gaze position, suggesting shared visual- and vestibular-related mechanisms. The lesion was mapped to a functionally ill-defined area of the dorsal midbrain, adjacent to the posterior commissure and sparing nuclei with known roles in vertical gaze control. CONCLUSION: A circumscribed region in the dorsal midbrain appears to be a key node for disconjugate eye movements in both vertical and horizontal planes. Lesioning this area produces a unique ocular motor syndrome mirroring hallmarks of developmental strabismus and nystagmus. Further circuit-level studies could offer pivotal insights into shared pathomechanisms of acquired and developmental disorders affecting eye alignment.
