Methane losses from different biogas plant technologies.

Biogas and biomethane production can play an important role in a fossil-fuel-free energy supply, provided that process-related methane (CH4) losses are minimized. Addressing the lack of representative emission data, this study aims to provide component specific CH4 emission factors (EFs) for various biogas plant technologies, enabling more accurate emission estimates for the biogas sector and supporting the identification of low emission technologies. Four measurement teams investigated 33 biogas plants in Austria, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland including mainly agricultural and biowaste treating facilities. For the first time, a harmonized measurement procedure was used to systematically survey individual on-site emission sources and leakages. Measurements revealed a large variability in technology specific emissions, especially for biogas utilization and upgrading. Median loss from combined heat and power (CHP) plants was 1.6 % for gas engines (n = 21), and 3.0 % for pilot injection units (n = 3) of the input CH4. Biogas upgrading units showed median CH4 slips of < 0.1 % (chemical scrubbers, n = 4), 0.1 % (after exhaust gas treatment, n = 3) and 2.9 % (water scrubbers, n = 2). Not-gastight digestate storage (n = 8) was identified as a major emission source with maximum 5.6 % of the produced CH4 emitted. Individual leakages (n = 37) released between 0.0 and 2.1 % (median 0.1 %) relative to the CH4 production. All measurement and secondary data are provided in a harmonized dataset (294 datapoints). A review of IPCC default EFs indicate an underestimation of emissions from biogas utilization (reported in the energy sector) while the impact of leakages on overall plant emissions (waste sector) may be overestimated for European biogas plants.

Invasive forbs differ functionally from native graminoids, but are similar to native forbs.

• Exotic plant invasions can alter ecosystem processes, particularly if the invasive species are functionally different from native species. We investigated whether such alterations can be explained by differences in functional traits between native and invasive plants of the same functional group or by differences in functional group affiliation. • We compared six invasive forbs in Europe with six native forbs and six native graminoids in leaf and whole-plant traits, plasticity in response to nutrient supply and interspecific competition, litter decomposition rate, effects on soil nutrient availability, and allelopathy. All traits were measured in a series of pot experiments, and leaf traits additionally in the field. • Invasive forbs differed from native forbs for only a few traits; they had less leaf chlorophyll and lower phosphorus (P) uptake from soil, but they tended to have a stronger allelopathic effect. The invasive forbs differed in many traits from the native graminoids, their leaves had lower tissue densities and a shorter life span, their litter decomposed faster and they had a lower nitrogen-use efficiency. • Our results suggest that invasive forbs have the potential to alter ecosystem properties when invading graminoid-dominated and displacing native graminoids but not when displacing native forbs.