Outcome Prediction in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Retrospective International Multicenter Study.

The role of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (V-V ECMO) in severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still under debate and conclusive data from large cohorts are scarce. Furthermore, criteria for the selection of patients that benefit most from this highly invasive and resource-demanding therapy are yet to be defined. In this study, we assess survival in an international multicenter cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V-V ECMO and evaluate the performance of several clinical scores to predict 30-day survival. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated retrospective non-interventional international multicenter registry study (NCT04405973, first registered 28 May 2020). In 127 patients treated with V-V ECMO at 15 centers in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, and the United States, we calculated the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score, Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) Score, Predicting Death for Severe ARDS on V­V ECMO (PRESERVE) Score, and 30-day survival. RESULTS: In our study cohort which enrolled 127 patients, overall 30-day survival was 54%. Median SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, RESP, and PRESERVE were 9, 36, 17, 1, and 4, respectively. The prognostic accuracy for all these scores (area under the receiver operating characteristic-AUROC) ranged between 0.548 and 0.605. CONCLUSIONS: The use of scores for the prediction of mortality cannot be recommended for treatment decisions in severe COVID-19 ARDS undergoing V-V ECMO; nevertheless, scoring results below or above a specific cut-off value may be considered as an additional tool in the evaluation of prognosis. Survival rates in this cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V­V ECMO were slightly lower than those reported in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO.

Implementing an Innovative Cardiac Assist System in a Nonuniversity Hospital--Feasibility, Complications, and First Results.

To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a cardiac assist system in a nonuniversity hospital we analyzed 18 consecutive patients treated with venoarterial membrane oxygenation. The system was used electively in 5/18 (27.8%) patients during high-risk interventions. Thirteen patients (72.2%) were treated in emergency situations. The extracorporal system could be initiated successfully in all patients. Periprocedural complications were hemolysis in 3/18 (16.7%), disseminated intravascular coagulation in 2/18 (11.1%), cerebral ischemia in 1/18 (5.6%), and local infection in 2/18 (11.1%) patients. None of these led to a discontinuation of the therapy. All electively treated patients were successfully weaned from the extracorporeal system. In 9/13 (69.2%) emergency patients the system was removed successfully. The 60-day survival rate of the emergency patients was 53.8% (7/13). Our experience confirms that an innovative extracorporeal circulatory support system can be implemented in a nonuniversity hospital at a tolerable risk and a low complication and high procedural success rate.

High interpatient variability in response to mycophenolic acid maintenance therapy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is used in the maintenance therapy of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV). MPA exerts its immunosuppression by inhibiting inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), depleting activated lymphocytes of guanine nucleotides and retarding their proliferation. The purpose of our study was to examine the correlation between clinical outcome and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships of MPA in patients with AASV. METHODS: We studied 358 Caucasian control patients without any MPA therapy to examine basal IMPDH activity. Thirty Caucasian patients with AASV under maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) underwent therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: We observed a high interindividual variability with regard to basal IMPDH activity in patients without any MPA treatment (0.8-35 nmol/mg protein/h). Patients were followed for a mean (±SD) period of 22 ± 8 months. During the observation period, seven patients had a relapse with an elevated Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 9.2 ± 6. The basal IMPDH activity (Abasal) in patients who subsequently relapsed was raised at baseline, before receiving their first dose of MMF, and further increased at the time of relapse, when compared with stable patients. Patients with a relapse during the maintenance therapy had significantly higher levels of IMPDH activity [IMPDH enzyme activity curve (AEC) (0-12)] than stable patients (P = 0.001), indicating inadequate IMPDH suppression. MPA-AUC (0-12) was significantly decreased in relapse patients, in contrast to stable patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the highly variable response to maintenance therapy with MPA, PD drug monitoring is a new tool for detecting inadequate immunosuppression in AASV patients.

Proton pump inhibitors interfere with the immunosuppressive potency of mycophenolate mofetil.

OBJECTIVES: MMF is cleaved in the acidic milieu of the gastric compartment. However, its absorption might be impeded by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which suppress acid production and thus increase stomach pH. Since PPIs are widely used, it is useful to clarify whether the total drug amount of MMF is available in patients undergoing PPI treatment. METHODS: We analysed 36 patients with autoimmune diseases under stable MMF maintenance therapy. Twenty-three patients received co-medication with pantoprazole; 13 patients received no treatment with PPIs or antacids. To assess the immunosuppressive potency, we measured mycophenolic acid levels and inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity with a validated HPLC method in plasma samples collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after oral administration. RESULTS: The mean MMF dosage of the non-PPI patients was 770 (249) mg/12 h and 771 (291) mg/12 h in pantoprazole-treated patients (NS). The total area under the curve of MMF showed a 37% reduction in PPI patients vs those treated with no PPIs (P < 0.01), and the maximum peak concentration of MMF was 60% lower in the pantoprazole patients (P < 0.001). The MMF exposure correlated with the inhibition of IMPDH activity. The area of enzyme activity curve was 42% higher in the PPI patients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The co-medication of pantoprazole with MMF significantly influences the drug exposure and immunosuppressive potency of MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases. This finding might at least partly explain the different outcomes in studies using MMF for maintenance therapy.