Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour as a personalised secondary prevention strategy for patients with coronary artery disease: main outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A high sedentary time is associated with increased mortality risk. Previous studies indicate that replacement of sedentary time with light- and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity attenuates the risk for adverse outcomes and improves cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with cardiovascular disease are more sedentary compared to the general population, while daily time spent sedentary remains high following contemporary cardiac rehabilitation programmes. This clinical trial investigated the effectiveness of a sedentary behaviour intervention as a personalised secondary prevention strategy (SIT LESS) on changes in sedentary time among patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients were randomised to usual care (n = 104) or SIT LESS (n = 108). Both groups received a comprehensive 12-week centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programme with face-to-face consultations and supervised exercise sessions, whereas SIT LESS participants additionally received a 12-week, nurse-delivered, hybrid behaviour change intervention in combination with a pocket-worn activity tracker connected to a smartphone application to continuously monitor sedentary time. Primary outcome was the change in device-based sedentary time between pre- to post-rehabilitation. Changes in sedentary time characteristics (prevalence of prolonged sedentary bouts and proportion of patients with sedentary time ≥ 9.5 h/day); time spent in light-intensity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; step count; quality of life; competencies for self-management; and cardiovascular risk score were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (77% male) were 63 ± 10 years and primarily diagnosed with myocardial infarction (78%). Sedentary time decreased in SIT LESS (- 1.6 [- 2.1 to - 1.1] hours/day) and controls (- 1.2 [ ─1.7 to - 0.8]), but between group differences did not reach statistical significance (─0.4 [─1.0 to 0.3]) hours/day). The post-rehabilitation proportion of patients with a sedentary time above the upper limit of normal (≥ 9.5 h/day) was significantly lower in SIT LESS versus controls (48% versus 72%, baseline-adjusted odds-ratio 0.4 (0.2-0.8)). No differences were observed in the other predefined secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation, SIT LESS did not induce significantly greater reductions in sedentary time compared to controls, but delivery was feasible and a reduced odds of a sedentary time ≥ 9.5 h/day was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NL9263. Outcomes of the SIT LESS trial: changes in device-based sedentary time from pre-to post-cardiac rehabilitation (control group) and cardiac rehabilitation + SIT LESS (intervention group). SIT LESS reduced the odds of patients having a sedentary time >9.5 hours/day (upper limit of normal), although the absolute decrease in sedentary time did not significantly differ from controls. SIT LESS appears to be feasible, acceptable and potentially beneficial, but a larger cluster randomised trial is warranted to provide a more accurate estimate of its effects on sedentary time and clinical outcomes. CR: cardiac rehabilitation.

Sedentary Behaviour Intervention as a Personalised Secondary Prevention Strategy (SIT LESS) for patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are more sedentary compared with the general population, but contemporary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes do not specifically target sedentary behaviour (SB). We developed a 12-week, hybrid (centre-based+home-based) Sedentary behaviour IntervenTion as a personaLisEd Secondary prevention Strategy (SIT LESS). The SIT LESS programme is tailored to the needs of patients with CAD, using evidence-based behavioural change methods and an activity tracker connected to an online dashboard to enable self-monitoring and remote coaching. Following the intervention mapping principles, we first identified determinants of SB from literature to adapt theory-based methods and practical applications to target SB and then evaluated the intervention in advisory board meetings with patients and nurse specialists. This resulted in four core components of SIT LESS: (1) patient education, (2) goal setting, (3) motivational interviewing with coping planning, and (4) (tele)monitoring using a pocket-worn activity tracker connected to a smartphone application and providing vibrotactile feedback after prolonged sedentary bouts. We hypothesise that adding SIT LESS to contemporary CR will reduce SB in patients with CAD to a greater extent compared with usual care. Therefore, 212 patients with CAD will be recruited from two Dutch hospitals and randomised to CR (control) or CR+SIT LESS (intervention). Patients will be assessed prior to, immediately after and 3 months after CR. The primary comparison relates to the pre-CR versus post-CR difference in SB (objectively assessed in min/day) between the control and intervention groups. Secondary outcomes include between-group differences in SB characteristics (eg, number of sedentary bouts); change in SB 3 months after CR; changes in light-intensity and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; quality of life; and patients' competencies for self-management. Outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial will provide novel insight into the effectiveness of a structured, hybrid and personalised behaviour change intervention to attenuate SB in patients with CAD participating in CR. Trial registration number NL9263.

[Dementia with Lewy bodies; 2 patients with exacerbation due to an atypical antipsychotic, but with a favorable response to the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine]. / Dementie met Lewy-lichaampjes; 2 patiënten met verergering door een atypisch antipsychoticum, maar met een gunstige reactie op de cholinesteraseremmer rivastigmine.

In two patients, men aged 80 and 75 years with cognitive deterioration, hallucinations and parkinsonism, the clinical diagnosis 'dementia with Lewy bodies' was established. Treatment with an atypical antipsychotic, risperidone and olanzapine respectively, resulted in an exacerbation of the parkinsonism. Rivastigmine evidently improved the psychosis, the anxiety and the cognitive, mood and behaviour disorders. Titrated treatment with levodopa improved the mobility without an increase of the psychosis. The treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies is complex. Levodopa can lead to an increase in visual hallucinations. Antipsychotics often cause serious side effects, such as increasing parkinsonism, sedation and cognitive deterioration. Cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine could possibly provide an alternative treatment for the neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Expression and modulation of apoptosis regulatory molecules in human melanocytes: significance in vitiligo.

Although the aetiology of the hypopigmentary disorder vitiligo is ill understood, it is clear that pigment producing cells are absent from vitiliginous lesional skin. The present study was designed to investigate the possible role of melanocyte-expressed apoptosis regulatory molecules in melanocyte disappearance. Flow cytometric evaluation of p53, p21, Bcl-2 and Bax revealed no differences in in vitro expression levels between normal control and non-lesional melanocytes. Moreover, no in situ immunohistological differences were observed in melanocytes present in control, non-lesional and perilesional skin. However, an enhanced number of p53+ nuclei, in the absence of detectable p21 expression, was detected in involved areas. The observed p53 expression pattern did not involve melanocytes and could be the result of ultraviolet (UV) A irradiation. Further, we showed that UVB is capable of modulating melanocyte-expressed apoptosis regulatory molecules. Consequently, a lethal dose of UVB was given to two groups of cultured normal control and non-lesional melanocytes. No significant differences were found when comparing the percentages and kinetics of UVB-induced apoptosis in these groups. In conclusion, our results indicate that the relative apoptosis susceptibility of melanocytes in vitiligo is comparable with that of normal control cells. It is therefore unlikely that vitiligo is causally related to dysregulation of apoptosis regulatory molecules.