BRCAness digitalMLPA profiling predicts benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative and luminal-type breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously showed that BRCA-like profiles can be used to preselect individuals with the highest risk of carrying BRCA mutations but could also indicate which patients would benefit from double-strand break inducing chemotherapy. A simple, robust, and reliable assay for clinical use that utilizes limited amounts of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue to assess BRCAness status in both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer (BC) is currently lacking. METHODS: A digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (digitalMLPA) assay was designed to detect copy number alterations required for the classification of BRCA1-like and BRCA2-like BC. The BRCA1-like classifier was trained on 71 tumors, enriched for triple-negative BC; the BRCA2-like classifier was trained on 55 tumors, enriched for luminal-type BC. A shrunken centroid-based classifier was developed and applied on an independent validation cohort. A total of 114 cases of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed, and the association of the classifier result with intensified platinum-based chemotherapy response was assessed. RESULTS: The digitalMLPA BRCA1-like classifier correctly classified 91% of the BRCA1-like samples and 82% of the BRCA2-like samples. Patients with a BRCA-like tumor derived significant benefit of high-dose chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.44) which was not observed in non-BRCA-like patients (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.37-2.18) (p = 0.01). Analysis stratified for ER status showed borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: The digitalMLPA is a reliable method to detect a BRCA1- and BRCA2-like pattern on clinical samples and predicts platinum-based chemotherapy benefit in both triple-negative and luminal-type BC.

BRCA1-Mutated Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Shows BRCAness, Suggesting Sensitivity to Drugs Targeting Homologous Recombination Deficiency.

Purpose: As estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers arises at an older age with less aggressive tumor characteristics than ER-negative (ER-) BRCA1-mutated breast cancer, it has been suggested that these tumors are "sporadic" and not BRCA1 driven. With the introduction of targeted treatments specific for tumors with a nonfunctioning BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, the question whether the BRCA genes are impaired in the tumor is highly relevant. Therefore, we performed genomic profiling of BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors.Experimental Design: Genomic profiling, BRCA1 promoter methylation assessment, and loss of heterozygosity analysis were done on 16 BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors. Results were compared with 57 BRCA1-mutated ER- tumors, 36 BRCA2-mutated ER+-associated tumors, and 182 sporadic ER+ tumors.Results: The genomic profile of BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors was different from BRCA1-mutated ER- breast tumors, but highly similar to BRCA2-mutated ER+ tumors. In 83% of the BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors, loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele was observed. In addition, clinicopathologic variables in BRCA1-mutated ER+ cancer were also more similar to BRCA2-mutated ER+ and sporadic ER+ breast cancer than to BRCA1-mutated ER- cancers.Conclusions: As BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors show a BRCAness copy number profile and LOH, it is likely that the loss of a functional BRCA1 protein plays a role in tumorigenesis in BRCA1-mutated ER+ tumors. Therefore, we hypothesize that these tumors are sensitive to drugs targeting the BRCA1 gene defect, providing new targeted treatment modalities for advanced BRCA-deficient, ER+ breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(5); 1236-41. ©2016 AACR.

Genomic profile of endometrial tumors depends on morphological subtype, not on tamoxifen exposure.

Tamoxifen has been a very effective treatment for breast cancer for several decades, however, at the same time increases the risk of endometrial cancer, especially after prolonged exposure. In addition, tamoxifen has been associated with a higher proportion of unfavorable uterine tumor subtypes (carcinosarcomas and serous adenocarcinomas) with worse survival. We investigated whether endometrial tumors, which developed after prolonged tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer, are genetically different from endometrial tumors without preceding tamoxifen exposure. Array CGH was used on archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded endometrial tumors to determine genomic aberrations. We compared the genomic profiles of 52 endometrial tumors from breast cancer patients after long-term (>or=2 years) tamoxifen use (endometrioid adenocarcinomas, n = 26; carcinosarcomas, n = 14; and serous adenocarcinomas, n = 12) with endometrial tumors from unexposed breast cancer patients (n = 45). Genomic profiles were correlated with tamoxifen exposure, tumor subtypes, and histopathological characteristics of the endometrial tumors. The common uterine corpus cancers of the endometrioid subtype show few genomic aberrations. Tumors with many genomic aberrations were in general ER-negative. In contrast, carcinosarcomas and serous adenocarcinomas showed many aberrations; however, they were indistinguishable from each other. Tumors that developed after prolonged tamoxifen use did not show more or different aberrations than unexposed tumors. This was true for all tumor subtypes. Thus, endometrial carcinomas that develop after prolonged tamoxifen use cannot be distinguished from nonusers on basis of their tumor genomic profile.