Characteristics of 1555 childhood-onset lupus in three groups based on distinct time intervals to disease diagnosis: a Brazilian multicenter study.

Objective The objective of this study was to compare demographic data, clinical/laboratorial features and disease activity at diagnosis in three different groups with distinct time intervals between onset of signs/symptoms and disease diagnosis. Methods A multicenter study was performed in 1555 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (American College of Rheumatology criteria) patients from 27 pediatric rheumatology services. Patients were divided into three childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus groups: A: short time interval to diagnosis (<1 month); B: intermediate time interval (≥1 and <3 months); and C: long time interval (≥3 months). An investigator meeting was held to define the protocol. Demographic data, SLICC classification criteria and SLEDAI-2 K were evaluated. Results The number of patients in each group was: A = 60 (4%); B = 522 (33.5%); and C = 973 (62.5%). The median age at diagnosis (11.1 (4.2-17) vs. 12 (1.9-17.7) vs. 12.5 (3-18) years, P = 0.025) was significantly lower in group A compared with groups B and C. The median number of diagnostic criteria according to SLICC (7 (4-12) vs. 6 (4-13) vs. 6 (4-12), P < 0.0001) and SLEDAI-2 K (18 (6-57) vs. 16 (2-63) vs. 13 (1-49), P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in group A than the other two groups. The frequency of oral ulcers in the palate (25% vs. 15% vs. 11%, P = 0.003), pleuritis (25% vs. 24% vs. 14%, P < 0.0001), nephritis (52% vs. 47% vs. 40%, P = 0.009), neuropsychiatric manifestations (22% vs. 13% vs. 10%, P = 0.008), thrombocytopenia (32% vs. 18% vs. 19%, P = 0.037), leucopenia/lymphopenia (65% vs. 46% vs. 40%, P < 0.0001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (79% vs. 66% vs. 61%, P = 0.01) were significantly higher in group A compared with the other groups. In contrast, group C had a less severe disease characterized by higher frequencies of synovitis (61% vs. 66% vs. 71%, P = 0.032) and lower frequencies of serositis (37% vs. 33% vs. 25%, P = 0.002), proteinuria >500 mg/day (48% vs. 45% vs. 36%, P = 0.002) and low complement levels (81% vs. 81% vs. 71%, P < 0.0001) compared with groups A or B. Conclusions Our large Brazilian multicenter study demonstrated that for most childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients, diagnosis is delayed probably due to mild disease onset. Conversely, the minority has a very short time interval to diagnosis and a presentation with a more severe and active multisystemic condition.

GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we have analyzed GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), to investigate a possible role of these genes as genetic components of the disease. METHODS: A total of 103 individuals (49 oligoarticular, 41 polyarticular and 13 systemic) were analyzed for the three polymorphisms, using a PCR/RFLP methodology. RESULTS: We have observed significantly increased frequencies of individuals with GSTT1 null genotype in JIA patients comparing to controls (37% x 21%; p=0.0183). There was a 2-fold increased risk (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.1) associating the disease with the GSTT1 null genotype. Considering the subgroups (oligoarticular, polyarticular and systemic), the results indicated an association between polyarticular and systemic patients and the GSTT1 null genotype. There was a 2-fold increased risk for polyarticular patients (OR 2.4, 95%, CI 1.1-5.4), and a 4-fold increased risk for systemic patients (OR 4.4, 95%, 1.3-14.5). CONCLUSION: The GSTT1 null genotype seems to be involved in polyarticular and systemic JIA.

Differential CCR5Delta32 allelic frequencies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subtypes: evidence for different regulatory roles of CCR5 in rheumatological diseases.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood and is characterized by persistent arthritis for at least 6 weeks. Its aetiopathogenesis is unknown but there is strong evidence that there is a substantial genetic component. Chemokine receptors genes are among the candidate genes for association with arthritis and other inflammatory diseases. The CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)Delta32 polymorphism has been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), conferring a protective effect. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the CCR5Delta32 polymorphism is associated with JIA and RA in Brazilian patients. METHODS: We investigated 203 RA patients, 101 JIA patients, and 104 healthy individuals by amplification of the CCR5Delta32 deletion. We compared the allelic frequencies among these groups, as well as among different JIA subtypes. RESULTS: The frequency of the Delta32 allele was higher in JIA patients (9.4%) as compared to control subjects (3.8%) and RA patients (3.2%). Grouping the patients according to JIA subtypes, we observed a higher CCR5Delta32 allelic frequency in the subtypes with a greater inflammatory component: 4.1% in oligoarticular (n = 49), 11.2% in polyarticular (n = 40) [9.5% in rheumatoid factor negative (RF-) and 33.3% in RF positive (+)], and 25% in systemic JIA (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in JIA, unlike in RA, CCR5Delta32 does not have a protective effect, but instead it could be a factor associated with more inflammatory forms of the disease. These observations give rise to new questions about the mechanism and the cellular types involved in JIA as well as about the aetiology of JIA.

[Assessment of vaccination coverage of the basic schedule for the 1st year of life]. / Avaliação da cobertura vacinal do esquema básico para o primeiro ano de vida.

Immunization coverage was evaluated in all 12-23 month-old children living in the area were five years before a Primary Care Practice had been set up. All children were investigated through home visits, checking of the immunization chart and relying on mothers' information. In 1986, a baseline study had identified an immunization coverage of under 60% for each of the scheduled vaccines. The current study confirmed that coverage was of 87% for three doses of DTP, 89% for Sabin, 88% for one dose of measles vaccine and 79% for BCG. Despite the high coverage achieved for each specific vaccine, when the basic schedule for the first year was verified, it was observed that only 75% of the children had received the full scheme. Immunization coverage is uneven in different census tracts, being higher in the poorest and more remote areas, where seam the health was given extra attention. A comparison with the routine administrative evaluation of the immunization coverage showed that this underestimated the real coverage. Maternal immunization uptake was also evaluated (antitetanus vaccine during pregnancy) and only 49% of the women were found to be adequately protected. The information collected led to a reorganization of the whole immunization program in a 100% coverage.

International collaborative studies on the pertussis vaccine potency assay. Part played by the challenge in the mouse-protection test.

Because of wide variations in the methods used to assay the potency of pertussis vaccine, the effect of the type of challenge used in the mouse-protection test was studied. Eight laboratories took part in a collaborative investigation and the potencies of 4 pairs of vaccines were estimated. Two methods were used, a "local method" using local strains and procedures for challenge, and a "study method" using a distributed strain and a specified procedure. For both methods the challenge level (mouse LD(50)) and the number of colony-forming units per challenge dose varied greatly between laboratories.The results of the collaborative assay show that the use of a common challenge, Bordetella pertussis strain 18-323, and a uniform method for preparing the challenge did not reduce the heterogeneity of the results. Other factors influencing the results of potency assays, such as the use of different strains of mice and the effect of levels of challenge, have still to be investigated.