Validity of the Short Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in patients with Parkinson disease and nonmanifesting LRRK2 and GBA carriers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Subtle executive dysfunction is common in people newly diagnosed with Parkinson disease (PD), even when general cognitive abilities are intact. This study examined the Short Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA-10)'s known-group construct validity, comparing persons with PD to healthy controls (HCs) and nonmanifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA gene mutations to HCs. Additionally, convergent and ecological validity was examined. METHODS: The study included 73 participants: 22 with idiopathic PD (iPD) who do not carry any of the founder GBA mutations or LRRK2-G2019S, 29 nonmanifesting carriers of the G2019S-LRRK2 (n = 14) and GBA (n = 15) mutations, and 22 HCs. Known-group validity was determined using the WCPA-10, convergent validity by also using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Color Trails Test (CTT), and ecological validity by using the WCPA-10, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (SE ADL), and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). RESULTS: Known-group validity of the WCPA-10 was established for the iPD group only; they followed fewer rules (p = 0.020), were slower (p = 0.003) and less efficient (p = 0.001), used more strategies (p = 0.017) on the WCPA-10, and achieved significantly lower CTT scores (p < 0.001) than the HCs. The nonmanifesting carriers and HCs were similar on all cognitive tests. Convergent and ecological validity of the WCPA-10 were partially established, with few correlations between WCPA-10 outcome measures and the MoCA (r = 0.50, r = 0.41), CTT-2 (r = 0.43), SE ADL (r = 0.41), and PASE (r = 0.54, r = 0.46, r = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the known-group validity for most (four) WCPA-10 scores and partially confirms its convergent and ecological validity for PD.

Neural activation in the prefrontal cortex during the digital clock drawing test measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy in early stage Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: The clock drawing test (CDT) is a neuropsychological test for the screening of global cognitive functioning. The test requires use of multiple cognitive domains including executive functions, visuospatial abilities and semantic memory and can be a suitable tool for screening cognitive decline in participants in the early stages of Parkinson's Disease (PD). Behavioral performance on the CDT has been studied in depth, however, neural activation during real-time performance has not been extensively investigated. In this study we explored changes in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during the performance of CDT in participants with PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and assessed the correlations between PFC activation and CDT performance. METHODS: The study included 60 participants, 29 PD and 31 HC participants whom performed a digital CDT (DCTclock) in conjunction with a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) system measuring neural activation in the PFC. RESULTS: HbO2 signals derived from the fNIRS during the CDT revealed that PD participants showed more moderate slopes than the HC in the right hemisphere in the command (p = 0.042) and copy task (p = 0.009). Better score on the measurement of information processing correlated with steeper right hemisphere HbO2 slope in the copy task in the PD group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our results reflect slower PFC activation in participants with PD which correlates with behavioral measures. In addition, the findings of the study indicate the importance of performing the CDT copy task condition that detect early cognitive decline in participants with PD.

Quantitative digital clock drawing test as a sensitive tool to detect subtle cognitive impairments in early stage Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of subtle cognitive decline in the early stages of Parkinson's Disease (PD) is common and is thought to be even greater in patients carrying genetic mutations in the GBA gene. Current cognitive tests often lack sensitivity to identify subtle impairments. Technological advancements may offer greater precision. We explored the utility of a digitized cognitive clock-drawing test to assess cognition in patients with PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and its sensitivity compared to that of standardized neuropsychological tests. Further, we investigated the existence of a cognitive profile based on genotype. METHODS: The study included 75 early stage PD patients (24 with GBA-PD, 23 LRRK2-PD, 28 idiopathic PD cases) and 59 HC. Participants underwent a cognitive assessment which included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Color Trails Test (CTT) and a digital clock drawing test (DCTclock). RESULTS: Patients with PD presented lower scores than HC on all cognitive tests. The DCTclock best discriminated PD from HC (AUC: 0.807) compared to the MoCA (0.590) and CTT (0.636 and 0.717 for CTT-1 and CTT-2 respectively). In-depth quantitative analysis of the DCTclock revealed that LRRK2-PD showed better performance than other PD sub-groups. CONCLUSION: The use of quantitative digital cognitive assessment showed greater sensitivity in identifying subtle cognitive decline than the current standardized tests. Differences in cognitive profiles were observed based on genotype. The identification of early cognitive decline may improve the clinical management of PD patients and be useful for cognitive related clinical trials.

Tablet Apps and Dexterity: Comparison Between 3 Age Groups and Proof of Concept for Stroke Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Touch screen tablet technology might be suitable for self-training of impaired dexterity poststroke. We compared performance of app-based hand activities in individuals without a disability from 3-age groups, and assessed the feasibility of using tablet apps in individuals with stroke. METHODS: Experiment I included 172 Individuals without a disability: 79 young adults (26.2 [3.9] years old), 61 middle-aged adults (55.9 [5.1] years old), and 32 older adults (68.7 [3.0] years old). Experiment II included 20 individuals with stroke, aged 59.3 ± 13.7 years with impairment of the upper extremity. All participants performed the app-based "Tap-it" (tapping) task twice and the Nine Hole Peg Test. The stroke group practiced with additional apps and underwent clinical assessments. RESULTS: Significant differences in the tapping task performance were found between the 3 age groups (dominant hand time: F(2,169) = 30.57; P = 0.0001; and accuracy F(2,169) = 25.20; P = 0.0001; nondominant hand time: F(2,169) = 35.09; P = 0.0001; and accuracy F(2,169) = 19.62; P = 0.0001). Of the 20 individuals with stroke, 15 were able to complete the 2 trials of the tapping task, but all participants reported enjoying the experience and thought the apps may have potential for stroke rehabilitation to improve performance of the stroke-affected hand. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Performance of tablet app-based hand activities was affected by impaired hand dexterity in older participants without a disability and in participants with stroke. Tablet apps may potentially provide a way to facilitate self-training of repetitive, task-oriented, isolated finger and hand movements to improve hand dexterity and function after stroke.Video abstract available for additional insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A118).

A multi-site study of functional outcomes following a themed approach to hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy for children with hemiplegia.

AIM: This study investigated the effects of a theme-based ('magic') variation of the hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy programme, in two different countries, in improving activity performance for children with hemiplegia, including those with severe movement restrictions. METHOD: Twenty-three children with spastic hemiplegia (13 males, 10 females; mean age 10y 7mo, range 7-15y; Manual Ability Classification System level I, two; level II, 13; level III, eight), participated in one of three, 2-week, summer camps. A within-participant experimental design was used with the Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand Experience Questionnaire as primary outcome measures. Evaluations occurred immediately before the first day, on the last day, and 3 months after intervention. Two groups underwent additional assessments 2 weeks before the camp. RESULTS: Significant intervention effects were seen on the Assisting Hand Assessment (p=0.002) and on the Children's Hand Experience Questionnaire (p<0.001), the latter maintained at follow-up. The affected hand was reported to be used in 25% of bimanual activities before the camp, progressing to 93% after camp, and decreasing to 86% at follow-up. Severity of impairment did not influence progress. INTERPRETATION: This themed approach to intensive intervention showed positive results in bimanual use, with improvements in independence sustained at follow-up. Although children across camps and motor severity made progress, some questions remain about intensity and duration of intervention to optimize longer-term outcomes.

Time to return to work and surgeons' recommendations after carpal tunnel release.

BACKGROUND: Time to return to work after carpal tunnel release is extremely variable suggesting that only a small proportion of total sick-leave is for medical reasons. AIMS: To determine factors predicting a delayed return to work. METHODS: Fifty consecutive employed patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery were tested pre-operatively, and then at 1 month post-operatively using both questionnaires and objective testing. Further follow-up by telephone was carried out every 2 weeks up until 90 days. RESULTS: Forty-nine of the 50 workers had returned to work by 3 months. Time to return to work was extremely variable ranging from 1 to 88 days in those who returned to work. Post-operative recommendations by the surgeon also varied widely from 1 to 36 days. The surgeons' recommendations were the strongest predictors of delayed return to work [odds ratio 30.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-288], with physical work (odds ratio 27.7; 95% CI, 1.5-507) and lack of self-rated health (odds ratio 5.0; 95% CI, 1.11-100) adding significantly to the logistic regression model, which was highly predictive (area under the receiver-operator curve of 88%). Patient symptoms and objective findings of disability did not add significantly to a logistic regression model either predicting return to work or the surgeon's recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that workers will return to work in less than 3 weeks if recommended by the surgeon. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine if a higher proportion of workers returning in less than 3 weeks can be obtained by standardizing surgeons' recommendations.