Evaluation of Integrated HPV DNA as Individualized Biomarkers for the Detection of Recurrent CIN2/3 during Post-Treatment Surveillance.

PURPOSE: Post-treatment follow-up in women with cervical pre-cancers (CIN3) is mandatory due to relapse in up to 10% of patients. Standard follow-up based on hrHPV-DNA/cytology co-testing has high sensitivity but limited specificity. The aim of our prospective, multicenter, observational study was to test the hypothesis that an individualized viral-cellular-junction test (vcj-PCR) combined with cytology has a lower false positive rate for the prediction of recurrence compared to standard co-testing. METHODS: Pre-surgical cervical swabs served for the identification of HPV16/18 DNA integration sites by next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery were evaluated by cytology, hrHPV-DNA and the patients' individual HPV-integration sites (vcj-PCR on the basis of NGS). RESULTS: Integration sites were detected in 48 of 445 patients (10.8%), 39 of them had valid follow-up data. The false positive rate was 18.2% (95% CI 8.6-34.4%) for standard hrHPV/cytology at six months compared to 12.1% (95% CI 4.8-27.3%) for vcj-PCR/cytology, respectively (McNemar p = 0.50). Six patients developed recurrences (1 CIN2, 5 CIN3) during follow-up. Standard co-testing detected all, whereas vcj-PCR/cytology detected only five patients with recurrences. Data of 269 patients without evidence of HPV16/18 integration were subject to post-hoc analyses. Standard co-testing revealed a false positive rate of 15.7% (95% CI 11.7-20.7%) and predicted ten of fourteen recurrences at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Although highly specific on its own vcj-PCR could not detect all recurrent CIN2/3. Possible reasons for this unexpected result may be multifocal lesions, intratumoral heterogeneity with respect to HPV integration and/or incident CIN.

Utility of EFC quality indicators for colposcopy in daily practice: results from an independent, prospective multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of colposcopy as the gold standard to manage abnormal screening tests depends on qualification and well defined standards. A recent survey of the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) found strong heterogeneity in the practice of colposcopy across Europe. EFC defined four quality indicators (QIs) to enable quality assessment in colposcopy as one tool to harmonize colposcopy standards. We undertook a pilot project to estimate the utility of these QIs for an independent external quality assessment in daily routine colposcopy. STUDY DESIGN: Participating colposcopy clinics used newly developed software for data collection. Data were automatically anonymized, encrypted and stored in a secure relational database located within the clinics' network and allowed for an independent external benchmarking comparing the performance of participating clinics according to EFC QIs. RESULTS: 10,869 patients referred for routine colposcopy were included. On average none of the four EFC QIs was fulfilled. One target was almost met with 83.3% instead of 85% excisional treatments/conizations containing CIN2+ and for another QI the difference of 94.4% instead of 100% cases having a colposcopic examination prior to treatment for abnormal cervical cytology was mainly explained by wrong documentation. For a third QI, visibility of the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) was only reported in 90.9% instead of 100% but reporting improved to 94.7% after a consensus meeting. The last QI, >80% clear margins in excised lesions/conizations were not considered as useful by some clinics and therefore not documented. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: At least 3 out of 4 QIs seemed to be useful for quality assessment in colposcopy but will need rewording and readjustment. All tools for an independent electronic quality assessment with the use of EFC-QI are available and could be used to achieve a high quality standard in colposcopy across Europe.

Utility and Reproducibility of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Classification of Transformation Zones in Daily Practice: A Multicenter Study of the German Colposcopy Network.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the distribution of International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) transformation zone (TZ) types among women in different age groups referred to 8 colposcopy clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2012 and February 2013, we prospectively collected individual patient data from 8 clinics within the German Colposcopy Network (G-CONE). Data were analyzed using ODSdysplasie, software designed to allow continuous quality assessment in colposcopy clinics. The distribution of IFCPC-classified TZ was compared between different centers for the following age groups: younger than 30 years, between 30 and 50 years, and older than 50 years. RESULTS: Of 3,761 patients included in the analysis, 2,153 (57%) were classified as having type 2 TZ, 906 (24%) as type 1 TZ, and 702 (19%) as type 3 TZ. Type 3 TZ was the most commonly reported type in women older than 50 years (70%). We found that the relative distribution of type 3 TZ between age groups was similar in the participating colposcopy clinics. However, there was evidence of heterogeneous distribution of types 1 and 2 TZ between age groups in different clinics, ranging from 7.8% to 66.4% for type 1 TZ in women younger than 30 years and 28.9% to 78.1% for type 2 TZ in women 30 to 50 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Although IFCPC type 3 TZ seems to be a reproducible finding, the distribution of types 1 and 2 TZ showed significant heterogeneity. A more precise anatomic distinction between types 1 and 2 TZ in the IFCPC terminology could improve reporting of colposcopy findings.

Accuracy of colposcopy management to detect CIN3 and invasive cancer in women with abnormal screening tests: results from a primary HPV screening project from 2006 to 2011 in Wolfsburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Combining HPV and Pap screening achieves very good risk stratification and sensitive detection of CIN3 and cancer (CIN3 +), but poorer specificity, and may result in an increased risk of glandular and new lesions during follow-up. We examined if this phenomenon may compromise the accuracy of colposcopy. METHODS: As part of a primary HPV screening pilot project comprising 19,624 participants aged over 30 years, the failure rate to detect CIN3 at first visit was measured over a five-year period to assess the quality of colposcopy as an overall management concept. Management relied on excisional biopsies in all HSIL cytology or major findings on colposcopy, endocervical assessment in type 3 transformation zones (TZ) and guided biopsies in type 1 or 2 TZ. RESULTS: Of 667 women referred for colposcopy because of atypical Pap smears and/or HPV persistency, 171 were diagnosed with CIN3+. All 18 cancers and 140/153 CIN3 cases were diagnosed at the first visit. Of 13 CIN3 observed during follow-up, five were classified as new cases, five as definite and three as probably colposcopy failures, giving a failure rate of 4.7% (8/171). Only three failures were related to false-negative punch biopsies while five occurred because of false-negative endocervical assessment in type 3 TZ. CONCLUSIONS: Colposcopy management following defined pathways was safe in this HPV screening program with an acceptable failure rate. Further improvements may depend on developing better methods for endocervical assessment rather than for ectocervical biopsies.

Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology.

OBJECTIVE: Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to increase the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), either when used in conjunction with Pap cytology testing or alone. However, there is no satisfying clinical management algorithm for women testing Pap negative/HPV positive. We therefore evaluated the clinical utility of a novel dual biomarker-based approach (p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology) for the identification of CIN2+ in women with Pap negative/HPV positive screening results, without the need to refer all women to immediate colposcopy. METHODS: All women aged ≥30 enrolled during 2007/2008 into a regional prospective Pap/HPV co-testing screening pilot project and tested Pap negative, but positive for HPV (n=425) were included in the analysis. p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology was performed from residual cellular material available from the liquid-based cytology vial collected during the initial Pap/HPV co-testing screening visit. Results were correlated to the presence of CIN2+ confirmed during preliminary follow-up. RESULTS: p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology tested positive at baseline in 108 out of 425 (25.4%) Pap negative/HPV positive cases. Sensitivity of Dual-stain testing for the detection of biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ during preliminary follow-up within the group of Pap negative/HPV positive women was 91.9% for CIN2+ (34/37 cases), and 96.4% for CIN3+ (27/28 cases). Specificity was 82.1% for CIN2+ on biopsy, and 76.9% for CIN3+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Triaging Pap negative/HPV positive screening test results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology may identify women with a high probability of underlying CIN2+ and may efficiently complement HPV-based screening programs to prevent cervical cancer.

Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany--experience over 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the German cervical cancer screening program encompasses an annual cytological Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. However, primary screening for cervical cancer using human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing detects cervical pre-cancerous lesions with a significantly higher sensitivity than the Pap smear-based cytology. OBJECTIVES: In order to develop viable modalities for primary cervical screening incorporating DNA testing for high-risk (HR) types of HPV, we started a pilot project in the city of Wolfsburg, Germany, in February 2006. This program provided a risk-adapted HPV testing-based strategy with defined patient pathways and extended screening intervals for women of 30 years or older. We report here the data of a 3-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: In the context of the usual routine screening at their office-based gynecologists, women were offered conventional cytology plus the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) HPV DNA test. Women with inconspicuous cytological findings (Pap I/II) and negative HC2 test were re-tested after 5 years but continued their annual gynecological examinations. When cytology and HC2 were positive, women were immediately referred to colposcopy. In women with a negative cytology but positive HC2 test, Pap smear was repeated after 6 mo and HC2 testing after 12 mo, and women were called for colposcopy if the HC2 test was persistently positive. RESULTS: From February 2006 to December 2008, 16,724 women agreed to participate in the project. Overall, 906 (5.41%) had positive HC2 results and 338 (2.02%) showed atypical Pap smears at recruitment. There were 417 (2.48%) women referred for colposcopy, 104 of whom were diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or worse, including 8 invasive cancers and 8 adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). No case of CIN 3 or worse occurred in HC2 negative women. CONCLUSIONS: The presented risk-adapted Wolfsburg Cervical Cancer Prevention Project ("Wolfsburg Model") has been shown to be effective and feasible in identifying women at risk and for avoiding unnecessary procedures for those who are double negative, thus allowing longer screening intervals and cost savings. Acceptance rates for the program were high for both participating women and gynecologists.