Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabet Med ; 37(9): 1490-1498, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583455

RESUMO

AIM: Poor glucose control is associated with adverse outcomes in pregnancies with pre-existing diabetes. However, strict glucose control increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, particularly in the first trimester. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether less tight glucose control in the first trimester determines adverse outcomes or can be compensated for by good control in late pregnancy. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 517 singleton pregnancies complicated by pre-existing diabetes delivering between 2010 and 2017. Three hundred and thirty-six pregnancies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of having available HbA1c values either pre-conception or in the first trimester (65% type 1 diabetes, 35% type 2 diabetes). RESULTS: Higher HbA1c values in the first trimester were associated with increasing rates of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates, preterm delivery or neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated third trimester HbA1c , type 1 diabetes, multiparity and excess weight gain, but not first trimester HbA1c , to be independently predictive for LGA. Pre-eclampsia and third trimester HbA1c increased the risk for preterm delivery. If HbA1c was ≤ 42 mmol/mol (6.0%) in the third trimester, rates of adverse outcomes were not significantly higher even if HbA1c targets of ≤ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) had not been met in the first trimester. Good first trimester glucose control did not modify the rates of adverse outcomes if HbA1c was > 42 mmol/mol (6.0%) in the third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Less tight glycaemic control, for example due to high frequency of severe hypoglycaemia in the first trimester, does not lead to increased adverse neonatal events if followed by tight control in the third trimester. Besides glycaemic control, excess weight gain is a modifiable predictor of adverse outcome.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Controle Glicêmico/métodos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Gravidez em Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Desenvolvimento Embrionário , Feminino , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Ganho de Peso na Gestação , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Paridade , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/metabolismo , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez/metabolismo , Gravidez em Diabéticas/metabolismo , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Diabet Med ; 36(2): 158-166, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30698863

RESUMO

AIMS: To compare glycaemic control, maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with Type 1 diabetes, managed either by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, multiple daily insulin injection or switch from multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in early pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 339 singleton pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. HbA1c values were measured preconception and in each trimester. In a secondary analysis, use of CSII pre-pregnancy was compared with initiation of CSII during pregnancy. RESULTS: MDI was used in 140 pregnancies (41.3%) and CSII was used in 199 (58.7%), including 34 pregnancies (10.0%) during which the women switched to CSII. In pregnancies during which CSII was used duration of diabetes [median (interquartile range) 16.0 (8.0-23.0) years vs 11.0 (5.5-17.5) years; P<0.001] was longer, and the Institute of Medicine recommendations for appropriate weight gain were exceeded more often (64.8% vs. 50.8%; P=0.01). CSII use and pre-pregnancy BMI were independent predictors of excess weight gain. There was no difference in glucose control, but CSII was associated with higher birth weight [median (interquartile range) 3720 (3365-4100) g vs 3360 (3365-4100) g; P<0.001] and higher large-for-gestational-age (LGA) rate (44.7% vs. 33.6%; P=0.04) than MDI. HbA1c concentration in the third trimester and excess weight gain were predictive of LGA infants [odds ratio 2.33 (95% CI 1.54-3.51); P<0.001 and 1.89 (95% CI 1.02-3.51); P=0.04]. In pregnancies where CSII therapy was initiated in the first trimester and in those with pre-pregnancy use, similar glucose control and outcome was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: There was no advantage of CSII with respect to glycaemic control and neonatal outcomes. The rate of LGA neonates was higher in the CSII group, possibly mediated by excess maternal weight gain, which was more frequent than in women treated with MDI.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Macrossomia Fetal/etiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Gravidez em Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Feminino , Ganho de Peso na Gestação/fisiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Injeções Subcutâneas , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , Idade Materna , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional , Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...