Focal atrial fibrillation: experimental evidence for a pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system.

INTRODUCTION: Focal paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was shown recently to originate in the pulmonary veins (PVs) and superior vena cava (SVC). In the present study, we describe an animal model in which local high-frequency electrical stimulation produces focal atrial activation and AF/AT (atrial tachycardia) with electrogram characteristics consistent with clinical reports. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 21 mongrel dogs, local high-frequency electrical stimulation was performed by delivering trains of electrical stimuli (200 Hz, impulse duration 0.1 msec) to the PVs/SVC during atrial refractoriness. Atrial premature depolarizations (APDs), AT, and AF occurred with increasing high-frequency electrical stimulation voltage. APD/AT/AF originated adjacent to the site of high-frequency electrical stimulation and were inducible in 12 of 12 dogs in the SVC and in 8 of 9 dogs in the left superior PV (left inferior PV: 7/8, right superior PV: 6/8; right inferior PV: 4/8). In the PVs, APDs occurred at 13+/-8 V and AT/AF at 15+/-9 V (P < 0.01; n = 25). In the SVC, APDs were elicited at 19+/-6 V and AT/AF at 26+/-6 V (P < 0.01; n = 12). High-frequency electrical stimulation led to local refractory period shortening in the PVs. The response to high-frequency electrical stimulation was blunted or prevented after beta-receptor blockade and abolished by atropine. In vitro, high-frequency electrical stimulation induced a heterogeneous response, with shortening of the action potential in some cells (from 89+/-35 msec to 60+/-22 msec; P < 0.001; n = 7) but lengthening of the action potential and development of early afterdepolar-izations that triggered APD/AT in other cells. Action potential shortening was abolished by atropine. CONCLUSION: High-frequency electrical stimulation evokes rapid ectopic beats from the PV/SVC, which show variable degrees of conduction block to the atria and induce AF, resembling findings in patients with focal idiopathic paroxysmal AF. The occurrence of the arrhythmia in this animal model was likely due to alterations in local autonomic tone by high-frequency electrical stimulation. Further research is needed to prove absolutely that the observed effects of high-frequency electrical stimulation were caused by autonomic nerve stimulation.

Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Vagal stimulation shortens the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and maintains atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated whether the parasympathetic pathways that innervate the atria can be identified and ablated by use of transvenous catheter stimulation and radiofrequency current catheter ablation (RFCA) techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 11 dogs, AERPs were determined at 7 atrial sites during bilateral cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and electrical stimulation of the third fat pad (20 Hz) in the right pulmonary artery (RPA). VNS shortened the AERP at all sites (from 123+/-4 to 39+/-4 ms, P<0.001) and increased the covariance of AERP (COV-AERP) (from 9+/-3% to 27+/-13%, P<0.001). RPA stimulation shortened the AERP at all sites from 123+/-4 to 66+/-13 ms (P<0.001) and increased the COV-AERP from 9+/-3% to 30+/-12% (P<0.001). In 7 dogs, transvascular RFCA of the parasympathetic pathways along the RPA was performed, and in 3 dogs, additional RFCA of parasympathetic fibers along the inferior (n=2) or superior (n=1) vena cava was performed. RFCA blunted the AERP shortening at all sites during VNS (114+/-4 ms after RFCA), abolished the increase of COV-AERP during VNS (12+/-7% after RFCA), and led to an increase of the baseline AERP (123+/-4 ms before versus 127+/-3 ms after RFCA, P=0.002). Before RFCA, AF could be induced and maintained as long as VNS was continued, whereas after RFCA, AF was no longer inducible during VNS. CONCLUSIONS: -Transvascular atrial parasympathetic nerve system modification by RFCA abolishes vagally mediated AF. This antifibrillatory procedure may provide a foundation for investigating the usefulness of neural ablation in chronic animal models of AF and eventually in patients with AF and high vagal tone.

Transvenous parasympathetic nerve stimulation in the inferior vena cava and atrioventricular conduction.

INTRODUCTION: In previous reports, we demonstrated a technique for parasympathetic nerve stimulation (PNS) within the superior vena cava, pulmonary artery, and coronary sinus to control rapid ventricular rates during atrial fibrillation (AF). In this report, we describe another vascular site, the inferior vena cava (IVC), at which negative dromotropic effects during AF could consistently be obtained. Moreover, stimulation at this site also induced dual AV nodal electrophysiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: PNS was performed in ten dogs using rectangular stimuli (0.1 msec/20 Hz) delivered through a catheter with an expandable electrode basket at its tip. Within 3 minutes and without using fluoroscopy, the catheter was positioned at an effective PNS site in the IVC at the junction of the right atrium. AF was induced and maintained by rapid atrial pacing. During stepwise increase of the PNS voltage from 2 to 34 V, a graded response of ventricular rate slowing during AF was observed (266 +/- 79 msec without PNS vs 1,539 +/- 2,460 msec with PNS at 34 V; P = 0.005 by analysis of variance), which was abolished by atropine and blunted by hexamethonium. In three animals, PNS was performed during sinus rhythm. Dual AV nodal electrophysiology was present in 1 of 3 dogs in control, whereas with PNS, dual AV nodal electrophysiology was observed in all three dogs. PNS did not significantly change sinus rate or arterial blood pressure during ventricular pacing. CONCLUSION: Stable and consistent transvenous electrical stimulation of parasympathetic nerves innervating the AV node can be achieved in the IVC, a transvenous site that is rapidly and readily accessible. The proposed catheter approach for PNS can be used to control ventricular rate during AF in this animal model.

Endovascular neural stimulation via a novel basket electrode catheter: comparison of electrode configurations.

We previously showed that parasympathetic stimulation by a basket electrode catheter (BEC) positioned in the superior vena cava (SVC) can slow sinus rate (SR) or ventricular response (VR) during atrial fibrillation (AF). In 11 dogs, anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, standard ECG leads II and aVR, blood pressure and right atrial electrograms were continuously monitored. Two different BEC configurations (B1, B2) were tested in the SVC. B1 consisted of five metal splines, each 3 cm in length. Stimulation was applied between adjacent splines. B2 consisted of 2 electrodes at opposite ends of each of 5 splines and a larger electrode at the middle of each spline. Stimulation was delivered between the two end electrodes and the middle electrode on the same arm. Stimulation consisted of square wave stimuli, each 0.1 msec duration, frequency 20 Hz at voltages from 1-40 V. Six dogs were studied with B1 and five were studied with the B2 configuration. The average voltage required to produce a 50% decrease in heart rate was 22+/- 12 V when stimulating between adjacent splines (B1) compared to 10+/- 5 V when stimulating along a single spline (B2), a 55% decrease (p

Ventricular rate control during atrial fibrillation by cardiac parasympathetic nerve stimulation: a transvenous approach.

OBJECTIVES: To identify intravascular sites for continuous, stable parasympathetic stimulation (PS) in order to control the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Ventricular rate control during AF in patients with congestive heart failure is a significant clinical problem because many drugs that slow the ventricular rate may depress ventricular function and cause hypotension. Parasympathetic stimulation can exert negative dromotropic effects without significantly affecting the ventricles. METHODS: In 22 dogs, PS was performed using rectangular stimuli (0.05 ms duration, 20 Hz) delivered through a catheter with an expandable electrode-basket at its end. The catheter was positioned either in the superior vena cava (SVC, n = 6), coronary sinus (CS, n = 10) or right pulmonary artery (RPA, n = 6). The basket was then expanded to obtain long-term catheter stability. Atrial fibrillation was induced and maintained by rapid atrial pacing. RESULTS: Nonfluoroscopic (SVC) and fluoroscopic (CS/RPA) identification of effective intravascular PS sites was achieved within 3 to 10 min. The ventricular rate slowing effect during AF started and ceased immediately after on-offset of PS, respectively, and could be maintained over 20 h. In the SVC, at least a 50% increase of ventricular rate (R-R) intervals occurred at 22 +/- 11 V (331 +/- 139 ms to 653 +/- 286 ms, p < 0.001), in the CS at 16 +/- 10 V (312 +/- 102 ms vs. 561 +/- 172 ms, p < 0.001) and in the RPA at 18 +/- 7 V (307 +/- 62 ms to 681 +/- 151 ms, p < 0.001). Parasympathetic stimulation did not change ventricular refractory periods. CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular PS results in a significant ventricular rate slowing during AF in dogs. This may be beneficial in patients with AF and rapid ventricular response since many drugs that decrease atrioventricular conduction have negative inotropic effects which could worsen concomitant congestive heart failure.

Transvenous parasympathetic cardiac nerve stimulation: an approach for stable sinus rate control.

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial electrical stimulation of parasympathetic nerves innervating the sinus node has been shown to decrease sinus rate. We investigated whether intravascular parasympathetic cardiac nerve stimulation (IPS) can be achieved over a relatively long-term period to slow the supraventricular rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen dogs were investigated. IPS was performed with rectangular stimuli (0.05-msec duration, 20 Hz) using a catheter with an expandable electrode basket. The catheter was positioned in the superior vena cava (SVC; n = 9) or right pulmonary artery (RPA; n = 6). The basket then was expanded to hold the catheter in place. Nonfluoroscopic identification of effective IPS sites was achieved within 5 minutes in the SVC. Increasing IPS voltage resulted in a graded response of supraventricular rate slowing. A 50% prolongation of the baseline atrial cycle length was achieved with 28 V in the SVC (1,056 +/- 355 msec vs 489 +/- 154 msec; P < 0.001) and 25 V in the RPA (1,181 +/- 306 msec vs 518 +/- 138 msec; P < 0.01). The rate slowing started immediately after IPS onset, terminated abruptly after IPS cessation, and could be maintained over 10 hours. A rate slowing effect also was observed when the sinus rate was increased by isoproterenol (SVC: 304 +/- 8 msec/RPA: 341 +/- 9 msec with isoproterenol vs SVC: 635 +/- 12 msec with isoproterenol + IPS at 39 V/ RPA: 584 +/- 16 msec with isoproterenol + IPS at 38 V; n = 6). CONCLUSION: IPS results in a significant supraventricular rate slowing that is stable over a relatively long period and may be applied to slow undesirable sinus tachycardia in acute ischemic syndromes or to counteract undesirable chronotropic effects of catecholamines during treatment of cardiogenic or septic shock and acute congestive heart failure.