RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate nasal airflow characteristics during physiologic breathing in normal and pathologic conditions. DESIGN: The choana of an anatomical human model was connected to a pump that simulated physiological pressure changes in the upper airway system. Normal ambient air was used as medium. The airstream was marked with aerosolized water particles, and was observed through an exact but translucent replica of the original nasal septum. RESULTS: In physiologic conditions the airflow is mixed. Turbulence is clearly visible even with low flow velocities. There is less turbulence with lower flow rates. The nasal airflow follows a triphasic pattern of acceleration, near-steady state, and deceleration. Turbulence is prominent in the first and third phases. The main flow stream passes through the middle meatus at all rates. Hypertrophic mucosal membranes and turbinates increase the proportion of air passing the middle meatus. With decongested turbinates, flow distribution is more even. After turbinectomy there is a significant amount of airflow passing along the floor of the nose. The olfactory region is aerated only toward the end of inspiration and during the entire expiration phase. CONCLUSIONS: This model allows the investigation of airflow distribution and turbulence under physiologic conditions and the examination of the influence of pathologic conditions on these parameters. Overzealous trimming of turbinates results in an unphysiologic distribution of airflow.
Assuntos
Modelos Anatômicos , Ventilação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Resistência das Vias Respiratórias/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstrução Nasal/fisiopatologia , Obstrução Nasal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Conchas Nasais/fisiopatologia , Conchas Nasais/cirurgiaRESUMO
We have tested the influence of face-mask style and volume on rhinomanometric measurements. Using an artificial head-and-piston pump to standardize the test conditions, four types of face masks (volumes varying from 120 to 200 ml) have been tested in a series of 20 measurements per mask. No statistical difference could be found between the series using a Chi-square test. We conclude that there is no influence of form and volume of the face mask on the accuracy of the rhinomanometric measurement.