Go with the flow: An experimental analysis with tubing alternative with irrigation.

Background and Aims: Literature regarding alternative tubing for fluid delivery in irrigation and debridement procedures is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare three different apparatuses with varying quantities of irrigation fluid to assess efficiency of administration and evaluate overall time for fluid administration. Methods: This model was designed to compare available methods of gravity irrigation used in practice. Fluid flow time was measured for three types of tubing: single-lumen cystoscopy tubing, Y-type double-lumen cystoscopy tubing, and nonconductive suction tubing. Irrigation times were assessed for varying volumes of 3, 6, and 9 L to investigate the relationship between bag changes and irrigation time. Bag changes were not conducted for the 3 L trial, but were for 6 and 9 L trials. Dimensions of cystoscopy tubing consisted of 4.95 mm internal diameter and 2.1 m length in both single-lumen and Y-type double-lumen apparatus. Nonconduction suction tubing dimensions were 6.0 mm internal diameter and standard 3.7 m in length. Results: The mean flow time for suction tubing was significantly faster than the cystoscopy tubing for the 3 and 9 L trials (p < 0.001). At 6 L, flow time for the suction tubing and the double lumen cystoscopy tubing were similar, 264 versus 260 s, respectively. At 9 L, the mean flow time for the suction tubing was 80 s faster (410 vs. 491 s) compared with single-lumen cystoscopy and was nearly 30 s faster compared with Y-type cystoscopy tubing. Conclusion: The results of this study provide insight into a faster, widely available, and cost-efficient alternative to commonly used cystoscopy tubing.

Pelvic Shadowing as a Diagnostic Predictor of Orthopedic Pathology in Orthopedic Trauma Patients.

Introduction The Throckmorton sign, or John Thomas sign, is a well-established orthopedic eponym, anecdotally used in orthopedic surgery to correlate the direction of male genitalia, observed on a pelvic radiograph, with the laterality of an associated orthopedic pathology. In earlier studies, the direction of pelvic shadowing on X-ray has been neither a credible nor a reliable predictor of fracture laterality. Given this small body of evidence, we sought to further investigate the relationship between peri-trochanteric hip fracture laterality and male genitalia lie. Method A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted of 397 consecutive male patients who received pelvic radiographs performed upon entry to an urban level 1 trauma center. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years or a prior history of pelvic or urological surgery. Of this cohort, 360 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent investigation. Results The study population had an average age of 42 years (range: 18-91 years). Statistical analysis yielded a 4.24 relative risk with pelvic shadowing laterality and respective peri-trochanteric hip fracture sidedness. Additionally, there was a 4.63 and 9.88 relative risk of tibial shaft fractures and distal radius fractures having a concomitant positive Throckmorton Sign, respectively. Conclusion Pelvic shadowing can be used as an additional diagnostic tool in predicting peri-trochanteric hip fracture sidedness in a trauma bay setting.

Use of 3D Navigation Versus Traditional Fluoroscopy for Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation.

Unstable pelvic ring disruption is most commonly treated with closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. Traditional methods involve screw placement under fluoroscopic imaging, but with recent technologic advances, intraoperative 3D navigation can now be used to help with the insertion of sacroiliac screws. Various cadaver studies have shown that placement of sacroiliac screws under 3D navigation is more accurate than placement under traditional fluoroscopic guidance. This retrospective review of 134 patients evaluated the clinical use of 3D navigation vs traditional fluoroscopy for sacroiliac screw insertion at an urban level I trauma center. Analysis of surgical data showed a significantly longer imaging time with the conventional method compared with the more experimental 3D navigation (204.06 seconds vs 66.90 seconds, P<.01). Further, a significantly larger radiation dose to both the patient and the staff was seen with traditional fluoroscopy (80.1 mGy for each) compared with that of 3D navigation (39.0 mGy and 25.1 mGy, respectively). No statistically significant difference was seen for outcome or follow-up variables between the 2 extrapolated groups. These variables included length of hospital stay, infection, nerve injury, and hardware breakage. The authors advocate that 3D navigated sacroiliac screws are safe and effective for pelvic ring stabilization; this method may be especially applicable in certain difficult imaging situations, such as morbid obesity, bowel gas interference, and overlapping pelvic structures that make the sacral corridor difficult to discern with traditional 2D fluoroscopy. Safe placement of transiliac-transsacral screws (P<.01) occurred with 3D navigation, and there was a statistically significant increase in adequate screw placement in multiple sacral segments compared with single-level stabilization (P<.01). [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):229-234.].

Levels of Evidence in Orthopaedic Trauma Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review and critically assess trends observed regarding the levels of evidence in published articles in orthopaedic traumatology literature. DATA SOURCES: The Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American, and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. STUDY SELECTION: All articles from the years 1998, 2003, 2008, and 2013 in The Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (JOT) and orthopaedic trauma-related articles from The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American (JBJS-A) and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR) were analyzed. Articles were categorized by type and ranked for level of evidence according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. DATA EXTRACTION: Study type and standardized level of evidence were determined for each article. Articles were subcategorized as high-level evidence (I, II), moderate-level evidence (III), and low-level evidence (IV, V). DATA SYNTHESIS: During the study period, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American reduced its low-level studies from 80% to 40% (P = 0.00015), Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research decreased its low-level studies from 70% to 27%, and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma decreased its low-level studies from 78% to 45%. Level IV and V therapeutic, prognostic, and diagnostic studies demonstrated significant decreases during the study period (P = 0.0046, P < 0.0001, P = 0.026). The percentage of high-level studies increased from 13% to 19%; however, this was not significant (P = 0.42). There was a trend showing an increase in level I and II studies for therapeutic, prognostic, and diagnostic studies (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a statistically significant decrease in lower level of evidence studies published in the orthopaedic traumatology literature over the past 15 years.