Converting IMPROVE bleeding and VTE risk assessment models into a fast-and-frugal decision tree for optimal hospital VTE prophylaxis.

ABSTRACT: Current hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for medical patients is characterized by both underuse and overuse. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) has endorsed the use of risk assessment models (RAMs) as an approach to individualize VTE prophylaxis by balancing overuse (excessive risk of bleeding) and underuse (risk of avoidable VTE). ASH has endorsed IMPROVE (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism) risk assessment models, the only RAMs to assess short-term bleeding and VTE risk in acutely ill medical inpatients. ASH, however, notes that no RAMs have been thoroughly analyzed for their effect on patient outcomes. We aimed to validate the IMPROVE models and adapt them into a simple, fast-and-frugal (FFT) decision tree to evaluate the impact of VTE prevention on health outcomes and costs. We used 3 methods: the "best evidence" from ASH guidelines, a "learning health system paradigm" combining guideline and real-world data from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), and a "real-world data" approach based solely on MUSC data retrospectively extracted from electronic records. We found that the most effective VTE prevention strategy used the FFT decision tree based on an IMPROVE VTE score of ≥2 or ≥4 and a bleeding score of <7. This method could prevent 45% of unnecessary treatments, saving ∼$5 million annually for patients such as the MUSC cohort. We recommend integrating IMPROVE models into hospital electronic medical records as a point-of-care tool, thereby enhancing VTE prevention in hospitalized medical patients.

Alignment of an interprofessional student learning experience with a hospital quality improvement initiative.

Assessment of interprofessional education (IPE) frequently focuses on students' learning outcomes including changes in knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes. While a foundational education in the values and information of their chosen profession is critical, interprofessional learning follows a continuum from formal education to practice. The continuum increases in significance and complexity as learning becomes more relationship based and dependent upon the ability to navigate complex interactions with patients, families, communities, co-workers, and others. Integrating IPE into collaborative practice is critical to enhancing students' experiential learning, developing teamwork competencies, and understanding the complexity of teams. This article describes a project that linked students with a hospital-based quality-improvement effort to focus on the acquisition and practice of teamwork skills and to determine the impact of teamwork on patient and quality outcome measures. A hospital unit was identified with an opportunity for improvement related to quality care, patient satisfaction, employee engagement, and team behaviours. One hundred and thirty-seven students from six health profession colleges at the Medical University of South Carolina underwent TeamSTEPPS® training and demonstrated proficiency of their teamwork-rating skills with the TeamSTEPPS® Team Performance Observation Tool (T-TPO). Students observed real-time team behaviours of unit staff before and after staff attended formal TeamSTEPPS® training. The students collected a total of 778 observations using the T-TPO. Teamwork performance on the unit improved significantly across all T-TPO domains (team structure, communication, leadership, situation monitoring, and mutual support). Significant improvement in each domain continued post-intervention and at 15-month follow-up, improvement remained significant compared to baseline. Student engagement in TeamSTEPPS® training and demonstration of their reliability as teamwork-observers was a valuable learning experience and also yielded an opportunity to gather unique, and otherwise difficult to attain, data from a hospital unit for use by quality managers and administrators.

Aligning Education with Collaborative Practice by Using Student Observations to Teach Interprofessional Teamwork.

As a component of a curriculum redesign to link foundational academic interprofessional education (IPE) to practice-ready skills and knowledge, students (n=582) at a southeastern academic health sciences center participated in required interprofessional course offerings that included observation of clinical or nonclinical units. Students enrolled in Behind the Scenes observed nonclinical teams across the enterprise, while students enrolled in TeamWorks became proficient observers of team behaviors using the TeamSTEPPS framework and utilized the TeamSTEPPS Team Performance Observation tool to collect observation data. Other students were enrolled in interprofessional courses consisting of theoretical content, group work, and didactic teaching strategies. Courses with observations earned significantly higher course evaluation scores than courses without, though limitations to such courses relate to course size and aspects of organization. Results demonstrate that utilizing observations can be a useful strategy for teaching teamwork at the foundational level, regardless of whether observations occur in a clinical or nonclinical setting.

Achieving High Reliability Through Cultural Mindfulness.

Healthcare has enthusiastically embraced quality and safety improvement. Yet, more radical transformation is clearly needed to make a more significant impact on error reduction and to ensure consistent quality. This need for transformation is leading healthcare to examine how other industries, such as nuclear power and aviation, improve safety to achieve a high degree of reliability and avoid potential catastrophes. Research has shown that successful organizations in high-risk industries achieve high reliability by maintaining a cultural mindfulness that allows them to continually reinvent themselves in complex environments. Healthcare faces similar challenges and could greatly benefit from instilling high-reliability principles in its operations. The Medical University of South Carolina, an academic health system, has been on a quest to improve safety and quality by implementing a high-reliability culture.

Hospital Guidelines for Diabetes Management and the Joint Commission-American Diabetes Association Inpatient Diabetes Certification.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission Advanced Inpatient Diabetes Certification Program is founded on the American Diabetes Association's Clinical Practice Recommendations and is linked to the Joint Commission Standards. Diabetes currently affects 29.1 million people in the USA and another 86 million Americans are estimated to have pre-diabetes. On a daily basis at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Medical Center, there are approximately 130-150 inpatients with a diagnosis of diabetes. METHODS: The program encompasses all service lines at MUSC. Some important features of the program include: a program champion or champion team, written blood glucose monitoring protocols, staff education in diabetes management, medical record identification of diabetes, a plan coordinating insulin and meal delivery, plans for treatment of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, data collection for incidence of hypoglycemia, and patient education on self-management of diabetes. RESULTS: The major clinical components to develop, implement, and evaluate an inpatient diabetes care program are: I. Program management, II. Delivering or facilitating clinical care, III. Supporting self-management, IV. Clinical information management and V. performance measurement. The standards receive guidance from a Disease-Specific Care Certification Advisory Committee, and the Standards and Survey Procedures Committee of the Joint Commission Board of Commissioners. CONCLUSIONS: The Joint Commission-ADA Advanced Inpatient Diabetes Certification represents a clinical program of excellence, improved processes of care, means to enhance contract negotiations with providers, ability to create an environment of teamwork, and heightened communication within the organization.

Nutrition in the hospitalized patient.

Almost 50% of patients are malnourished on admission; many others develop malnutrition during admission. Malnutrition contributes to hospital morbidity, mortality, costs, and readmissions. The Joint Commission requires malnutrition risk screening on admission. If screening identifies malnutrition risk, a nutrition assessment is required to create a nutrition care plan. The plan should be initiated early in the hospital course, as even patients with normal nutrition become malnourished quickly when acutely ill. While the Harris-Benedict equation is the most commonly used method to estimate calories, its accuracy may not be optimal in all patients. Calculating the caloric needs of acutely ill obese patients is particularly problematic. In general, a patient's caloric intake should be slightly less than calculated needs to avoid the metabolic risks of overfeeding. However, most patients do not receive their goal calories or receive parenteral nutrition due to erroneous practices of awaiting return of bowel sounds or holding feeding for gastric residual volumes. Patients with inadequate intake over time may develop potentially fatal refeeding syndrome. The hospitalist must be able to recognize the risk factors for malnutrition, patients at risk of refeeding syndrome, and the optimal route for nutrition support. Finally, education of patients and their caregivers about nutrition support must begin before discharge, and include coordination of care with outpatient facilities. As with all other aspects of discharge, it is the hospitalist's role to assure smooth transition of the nutrition care plan to an outpatient setting.

Effect of a pharmacist intervention on clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinically important medication errors are common after hospital discharge. They include preventable or ameliorable adverse drug events (ADEs), as well as medication discrepancies or nonadherence with high potential for future harm (potential ADEs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a tailored intervention on the occurrence of clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessors. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00632021) SETTING: Two tertiary care academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Adults hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes or acute decompensated heart failure. INTERVENTION: Pharmacist-assisted medication reconciliation, inpatient pharmacist counseling, low-literacy adherence aids, and individualized telephone follow-up after discharge. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the number of clinically important medication errors per patient during the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included preventable or ameliorable ADEs, as well as potential ADEs. RESULTS: Among 851 participants, 432 (50.8%) had 1 or more clinically important medication errors; 22.9% of such errors were judged to be serious and 1.8% life-threatening. Adverse drug events occurred in 258 patients (30.3%) and potential ADEs in 253 patients (29.7%). The intervention did not significantly alter the per-patient number of clinically important medication errors (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.10]) or ADEs (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.09 [CI, 0.86 to 1.39]). Patients in the intervention group tended to have fewer potential ADEs (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.61 to 1.04]). LIMITATION: The characteristics of the study hospitals and participants may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION: Clinically important medication errors were present among one half of patients after hospital discharge and were not significantly reduced by a health-literacy-sensitive, pharmacist-delivered intervention. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

The impact of hospitalists on length of stay and costs: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hospital medicine has undergone remarkable growth since its creation. Most (but not all) of the published literature demonstrates better outcomes for patients cared for by hospitalists. PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the magnitude of the impact of hospitalists on length of stay (LOS) and cost. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed. STUDY SELECTION: Articles published through February 2011 comparing outcomes (LOS and/or cost) of hospitalists with others. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently searched for abstracted information. We also contacted individual authors to provide us with missing data. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 502 abstracts were initially identified and 17 studies of 137,561 patients were included in the final analysis. LOS was significantly shorter in the hospitalist group compared with the non-hospitalist group, with a mean difference of -0.44 days (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.68 to -0.20, P < .001). In studies that compared a (non-resident) hospitalist service with a (non-resident) non-hospitalist service, LOS was also significantly shorter in the hospitalist group (mean difference -0.69 days [95% CI -0.93 to -0.46, P < .001]). Cost was not found to be significantly different (11 studies). There was significant heterogeneity between studies and we found no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitations, our analysis supports the conclusion that hospitalists significantly reduce LOS without increasing costs. These findings can be used to define and measure expectations of performance for hospital medicine groups.

Association between different types of social support and medication adherence.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between social support and medication adherence. STUDY DESIGN: A search of articles published before November 2010 in peer-reviewed, healthcare-related journals was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, and search terms related to social support (social support OR friend OR family OR agency) and adherence (patient compliance OR medication adherence), yielding 5331 articles. METHODS: Articles were included if they directly measured the relationship between medication adherence and some form of social support. Excluded were case studies, studies with participants < 18 years of age, and non-English language studies. Four social support categories were reported: structural, practical, emotional, and combination. Medication adherence was reported in the manner in which it was described in each study. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in the final analysis. A greater degree of practical support was most consistently associated with greater adherence to medication; evidence for structural or emotional support was less compelling. However, most studies were limited in size and design, and substantial variability in designs and outcome measurement prohibited pooling of results, necessitating qualitative evaluation of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative analysis found that practical social support was most consistently associated with greater medication adherence. Interventions that use existing contacts (friends or family) to engage patients in the mundane and practical aspects of medication purchasing and administration may be an effective approach to promoting better medication adherence.

U.S. physician satisfaction: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: There is concern in the US about the burden and potential ramifications of dissatisfaction among physicians. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the literature on US physician satisfaction. METHODS: A MEDLINE search with the medical subject headings (MeSH) phrases: (physicians OR physician's role OR physician's women) AND (job satisfaction OR career satisfaction OR burnout), limited to humans and abstracts, with 1157 abstracts reviewed. After exclusions by 2 independent reviewers, 97 articles were included. Physician type sampled, sample size/response rate, satisfaction type, and satisfaction results were extracted for each study. Satisfaction trends were extracted from those studies with longitudinal or repeated cross sectional design. Variables associated with satisfaction were extracted from those studies that included multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Physician satisfaction was relatively stable, with small decreases primarily among primary care physicians (PCPs). The major pertinent mediating factors of satisfaction for hospitalists include both physician factors (age and specialty), and job factors (job demands, job control, collegial support, income, and incentives). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of factors associated with satisfaction are modifiable. Tangible recommendations for measuring and diminishing dissatisfaction are given.

Diagnostic and treatment delays in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

BACKGROUND: Because Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is primarily an inpatient issue, hospitalists are at the forefront of the timely diagnosis and treatment of patients with this disease. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective cohort of all inpatients with CDAD at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 1997 to 2004 in order to determine the time to diagnosis and treatment in initial and recurrent episodes of disease. RESULTS: The mean time to sampling, between 2.09 and 2.24 days, was not significantly different between initial and recurrent CDAD hospital episodes. The mean time to treatment (from symptoms and sampling) was shorter in recurrent episodes but was still 2.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent disease were more likely to be treated earlier but not diagnosed earlier than those with initial disease. Because both groups had significant diagnostic and treatment delays, this is an area in which hospitalists can have a major impact on patient care.

An over-the-counter omission.

Despite the widespread use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications, their utilization is rarely ascertained at hospital admission. Presented here is an interesting case of acute renal failure and hemolytic anemia attributable to a commonly utilized OTC medication. The chronic use of phenazopyridine accounted for all of these findings. Upon discontinuation, everything normalized within one month. Although the differential diagnosis for renal failure and hemolytic anemia is extensive, scleral icterus, normal bilirubin, and orange-colored urine raised the suspicion of phenazopyridine use. This case report highlights overuse of common OTC medications, as well as a lack of knowledge of potential adverse reactions. With history-taking vigilance and patient education, adverse events from OTC medications can be minimized.

Overcoming barriers to pneumococcal vaccination in patients with pneumonia.

Inpatient pneumococcal vaccination remains underutilized, and little data exist to guide hospital personnel in improving their performance. The authors report their experience with a stepwise program to improve vaccination assessment rates for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. They assessed barriers to vaccination and applied a stepwise educational and intranet-based decision support implementation program for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Preintervention vaccination rates were 0%. Primary nursing and physician barriers were assessed. An educational intervention increased vaccination assessment rates to 35%, a nursing decision-support tool to 42%, and approval of a standing order policy to 96%. For patients older than 65 years, vaccination assessment rates increased 33%, 67%, and 100%, respectively. An educational program combined with a decision support tool and a standing order policy can improve vaccination assessment rates to high levels. This study suggests that a multidimensional intervention is required to improve compliance with inpatient vaccination best clinical practices.

Hospitalists and improved cost savings in patients with bacterial pneumonia at a state level.

OBJECTIVES: In the hospitalist literature, most studies have focused on outcomes related to cost savings for individual hospital systems. This study sought to determine if hospitalists could improve cost savings at a state level. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a statewide database for inpatients in 2002 with bacterial pneumonia. The primary outcomes measured were mean length of stay (LOS) and mean charges per patient between hospitalists and nonhospitalists. The secondary outcome measured was percentage of patients by severity of illness between the groups. RESULTS: The difference of LOS in the moderate illness category was 4.9 days for hospitalists and 5.2 for nonhospitalists (P = 0.04). The major illness category was 7.4 and 8 (P = 0.03), and the extreme illness category was 10.6 and 12.9 (P = 0.02). The difference of mean charges per patient in the major category were dollars 20,950 and dollars 23,259 (P = 0.03) and dollars 42,045 and dollars 56,867, respectively (P = 0.002), in the extreme category. Patients in the major/extreme categories of illness accounted for 41% of hospitalist patients versus 32% of nonhospitalist patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists have shorter LOS, lower charges per patient, and admit a larger proportion of high acuity patients at a state level.

Rapid reversal of renal failure after initiation of HAART: a case report.

HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN), characterized by proteinuria and progressive renal failure, is a well-known complication of HIV infection. Treatment of the condition has focused on the use of corticosteroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and HAART, all of which can improve the prognosis. Although there are a few case reports of improvement of renal function after the initiation of HAART, this treatment has not been studied in a prospective fashion, and the timing of the improvement is not well documented. Presented here is a case of rapid reversal of end-stage renal failure after the initiation of HAART in a person with biopsy-proven HIVAN.